Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of bidder competition in corporate takeovers

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of bidder competition in the corporate takeover process has long been recognized in theoretical models. This paper provides empirical tests of those models. The results indicate that resistance by target management to an initial bid encourages multiple bidders. Competing bidders are less likely to enter in cases where the target is large, but more likely to arise when the initial bidder is highly levered. High initial bids (preemptive bids) are found to discourage entry by additional firms. Surprisingly, targets with high levels of free cash flow tend not to be the recipients of multiple bids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, David P. “Tender Offers and Management Resistance.”Journal of Finance 38 (May 1983): 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, Elazar and Naveen Khanna. “How Target Shareholders Benefit from Value-Reducing Defensive Strategies in Takeovers.”Journal of Finance 45 (March 1990): 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, Elazar and M. P. Narayanan. “Competition and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers.”Review of Financial Studies 3 (Spring 1991): 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Michael. “Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate Control.”Journal of Business 53, (October 1980): 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Michael, Anand Desai and E. Han Kim. “The Rationale behind Interfirm Tender Offers: Information or Synergy?”Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April 1983): 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Michael, Anand Desai and E. Han Kim. “Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and their Division between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms.”Journal of Financial Economics 21 (May 1988): 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, Willard T., David K. Guilkey, Robert S. Harris, and John F. Stewart. “An Empirical Analysis of the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Mergers.”Journal of Finance 38 (June 1983): 813–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosslett, Stephen R. “Efficient Estimation of Discrete Choice Models.”In Charles F. Manski andDaniel McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Michael J. “A Theory of Preemptive Takeover Bidding.”Rand Journal of Economics 19 (Spring 1988): 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Michael J. “Preemptive Bidding and the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Acquisitions.”Journal of Finance 44 (March 1989): 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Robert G. “A Theory for the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions.”Journal of Business 60 (January 1987): 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, Gregg A. “The Wealth Effects of Litigation by Targets: Do Interest Diverge in a Merge?”Journal of Law and Economics 28 (April 1988): 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.”American Economic Review 76 (May 1986): 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, Naveen. “Optimal Bidding for Tender Offers”Northwestern University Working Paper (1985).

  • Lehn, Kenneth, and Annette Poulsen. “Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions.”Journal of Finance 44 (July 1989): 771–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles F., and S. R. Lerman. “The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples.”Econometrica (January 1977): 45–58.

  • Manski, Charles F., and Daniel McFadden. “Alternative Estimators and Sample Designs for Discrete Choice Analysis.”In Charles F. Manski andDaniel McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noronha, Gregory, Nilanjan Sen, and David Smith. “Determinants of the Medium of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions.”Journal of Applied Business Research 11 (Winter 1994–95) 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palepu, Krishna G. “Predicting Takeover Targets: A Methodological and Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Accounting and Economics 8 (March 1986): 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P'ng, I. P. L. “The Information Conveyed by a Tender Offer and the Takeover Price of a Target Firm.”UCLA Working Paper (1985).

  • Sen, Nilanjan. “An Investigation of the Acquisition Process in the Market for Corporate Control.”Virginia Tech Doctoral Dissertation (1990).

  • Walkling, Ralph A., and Michael S. Long. “Agency Theory, Managerial Welfare, and Takeover Bid Resistance.”Rand Journal of Economics 15 (Spring 1984): 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noronha, G.M., Sen, N. & Smith, D.M. Determinants of bidder competition in corporate takeovers. J Econ Finan 20, 39–47 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920605

Keywords

Navigation