Large-scale fuel ethanol from lignocellulose

Potential, economics, and research priorities
  • Lee R. Lynd
Session 4 Bioprocessing Research


Ethanol produced from lignocellulose is considered as a largescale transportation fuel in the United States. Five key issues are identified and considered in relation to the status of current and foreseeable technology. These are: conversion and production energy balances, suitability of ethanol as a transportation fuel, air quality impacts, raw material supply, and cost. Energy balances and fuel characteristics appear to be consistent with large-scale transportation fuel use of ethanol produced from lignocellulose. Local and global air-quality benefits are expected to accompany use of lignocellulose ethanol. Raw material availability is examined for wastes and for trees and grasses grown as energy crops. Ethanol production levels appear unlikely to be limited by raw material availability as long as economic and other factors are sufficiently favorable to justify allocation of land for this use. Projected ethanol production costs based on current directions of research would allow neat ethanol to become competitive with gasoline by the year 2000 according to current oil price predictions. Biological process steps have the largest contribution to overall costs, are among the least developed aspects of the technology, and appear to have the greatest potential for improvement. Research priorities are discussed.

Index Entries

Fuel ethanol lignocellulose economics biomass 


  1. 1.
    Cowling, E. G., and Kirk, T. K. (1976),Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 6, 95.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murtagh, J. E. (1986),Proc. Biochem. 21(2), 61.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Venkatasurbramanian, K. and Keim, C. (1985),Starch Conversion Technology, van Beynum, G. M. A. and Roels, J. A., eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, p. 143.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Advisory Panel on Cost-Effectiveness of Fuel Ethanol Production (November, 1987), “Fuel Ethanol Cost Effectiveness Study”.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rothman, H., Greenshields, R., and Calle, F. R. (1983),The Alcohol Economy: Fuel Ethanol and the Brazilian Experience, Francis Pinter, London.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ng, T. K., Busche, R. M., McDonald, C. C, and Hardy, R. W. F. (1983),Science 219, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palsson, B. O., Fathi-Afshar, S., Rudd, D. F., and Lightfoot, E. N. (1981),Science 213, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, E. (1988),Chem. Eng. News 65(43), 11.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greek, B. F. (1987),Chem. Eng. News 65(6), 9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Office of Technology, Assessment, (1980),Energy from Biological Processes, vol II, Technical and Environmental Analysis, Congress of the United States, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernhardt, W. (1977),Proceedings of the International Symposium on Alcohol Fuel Technology—Methanol and Ethanol, Nov. 21–23, Wolfsburg, FRG.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kampen, W. H. (1980),Hydrocarb. Proc. 59(2), 72.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy “MonthlyEnergy Review, (1988), DOE/EIA-0035(88/12).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biofuels and Municipal Waste Technology Program, US Department of Energy (1988), “Five Year Research Plan,” DOE/CH10093-25 DE88001181.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moorer, R. Program Manager, Alcohol Fuels Program, DOE, personal communication.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Office of Mobile Sources (1987),Air Quality Benefits of Alternative Fuels” US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Statement of the conference on The Changing Atmosphere: Implications for Global Security (1988).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hileman, B. (1989),Chen. Eng. News 67(11), 25.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kerr, R. A. (1989),Science 243, 865.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kerr, R. A. (1989),Science 243, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marshall, E. (1989),Science 243, 1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schneider, S. H. (1989),Science 243, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zurer, P. (1989),Chem. Eng. News 67(13), 23.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Economic Indicators, January 1989, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    US Geological Survey (1988), National Assessment of Undiscovered Conventional Oil and Gas Resources, working paper open file report 88–373.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grathwohl, M. (1982),World Energy Supply, de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    US Department of Energy (1988), Assessment of Costs and Benefits of Flexible and Alternative Fuel Use in the U.S. Transportation Sector, Progress Report One: Context and Analytical Framework, DOP/PE 0080 DE88 006893.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Petroleum Institute (1989), Basic Petroleum Data Book, Petroleum Industry Statistics,9 (1).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chevron Corporation, (1987), Corporate Planning and Analysis, World Energy Outlook, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferchak, J. D. and Pye, E. K. (1981),Solar Energy. 26, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ranney, J. W., Wright, L. L., and Layton, P. A. (1987),J. Forestry 85(9), 17.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith, N. and Corcoran, T. J. (1981),Biomass as a Nonfossil Fuel Source, Klass, D. L., ed.,ACS Symposium Series 144, 433.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lynd, L. R. (1989),Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Fiechter, A. ed., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, FRG,38, 1.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hinman, N. D., Wright, J. D., Hoagland, W., and Wyman, C. E. (1989),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Browning, L. H., Pefley, R. K., and Suga, T. P. (1981), Paper 1361,Proceedings of the 16th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, August 9—14, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Risch, C. (1988), Presentation to the California Air Resources Board Public Meeting on Clean Fuels, Sept. 9, Sacramento, California, Ford Motor Company, available from Ford Motor Co.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    US Department of Energy (1978), Comparative Automotive Engine Operation when Fueled with Ethanol and Methanol, HCP/W1737-01 UC-96.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wilson, R. D., EPA (Nov. 12, 1987), Statement before the Consumer Subcommittee of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, US Senate.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brinkman, N. D. (1980), Paper 1005,Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Alcohol Fueld Technology, Oct. 5—8, Guaruja, Brazil.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Menrad, H. K. and Loeck, H. (1980), Paper 557,Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Alcohol Fuels Technology, Oct. 5—8, Guaruja, Brazil.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Parker, H. W. (1982),Mech. Eng. 104(5), 54.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gray, C. L. (1987), Presented at the Alcohol Week Conference on Cleaner Air, July 16 (Available from EPA).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Koenig, A., Menrad, H. and Bernhardt, W. (1978),Alcohol Fuels, Sydney, August 9–11, 2–1.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Characterization and research investigation of alcohol fuels in automobile engines (1982), DE82 009350, available from NTIS.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Frederick, S. J. J., Morrison, J. L., and Small, K. A. (1987),Transportation Res. Record 1155, 12.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Obel, M. (1987),Oil Gas J. 85(6), 13.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stone & Webster (1985), Economic Feasibility of a Wood Gasification Based Methanol Plant. Report for SERI subcontract No. ZX-3-03095-1.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ranney, J. W. (1986),Advances in Solar Energy: An Annual Review of Research and Development, vol. 3, Boer, K. W., ed., Plenum, New York, p. 387.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Soil Conversation Service (1982), Basic statistics 1982 national resources inventory US Department of Agriculture, Statistical Bulletin No. 756.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    US Department of Agriculture (1988), “Agricultural Resources—Cropland, Water, and Conservation,” Situation and Outlook Report, Economic Research Service AR-12.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Klass, D. L. and Sen, C. T. (1988),Chapter One 2(1), 19.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grethlein, H. E., Allen, D. C, Converse, A. O. (1984),Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26, 1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Anthony Turhollow, Oak Ridge National Labs, personal communication.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Office of Planning and Analysis (1985), National Energy Policy Plan Projections, DOE/PE-0029/3.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wright, J. D. (1988),Chem. Eng. Prog. 84(8), 62.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wright, J. D., Milne, T., Karpuk, M., and Isaacs, S. (1986), Summary Report: Economic Feasibility Study of Alcohol Fuel Production Processes, available from NTIS.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    SERI, (1984), “Economic Feasibility Study of an Enzymatic Hydrolysis-Based Ethanol Plant with Prehydrolysis Pretreatment, “ XX-3-03097-2.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wright, J. D., Power, A. J., and Douglas, L. J. (1986),Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 17, 285.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wyman, C. E., SERI, personal communication.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Busche, R. M. (1984),Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. Ser. 13, 597.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Katzen, R., Ackley, W. R., Moon, G. D., Messick, J. R., Brush, B. F., Kaupsich, K. F. (1981),Fuels and Chemicals from Biomass and Wastes, Klass, D. L. and Emert G. H. ed., Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lynd, L. R. and Grethlein, H. E. (1984),Chem. Eng. Prog. 81, 59.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schluter, L. and Schmidt, R. (1983),Int. Chem. Eng. 23(3), 427.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Davison, B. H. and Scott, C. D. (1983),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 18 (1), 19.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wilke, C. R., Maiorella, B., Sciamanna, A., Tangu, K., Wiley, D. and Wong, H. (1983),Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose—Theory and Applications, Noyes Data Corp., Park Ridge.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lynd, L. R., Wolkin, R. W., and Grethlein, H. E. (1989), Fermentation of cellulosic substrates in batch and continuous culture byClostridium thermocellum. App. Environ. Microbiol., in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee R. Lynd
    • 1
  1. 1.Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanover

Personalised recommendations