Skip to main content
Log in

Technical and economic evaluation of different reactors for methanotrophic cultures for propylene oxide production

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-stage process for the manufacture of propylene oxide is described. The preliminary economics based on use of methanol as a regeneration factor has resulted in a production cost of $12.10/lb of propylene oxide based on propylene oxide production rate of 40 mg/g-cell/h in conventional reactor. Increasing the propylene oxide production from 40 to 500 mg/g-cell/h resulted in a cost reduction from $12.10 to 5.8/lb of propylene oxide. The granular-activated, carbon-fluidized bed reactor (GAC-FBR) absorbs the propylene oxide and when saturated is eluted with ethyl acetate, and the bed is regenerated by steam to drive off the residual solvents. The estimated manufacturing costs are approx 59% lower (from $12.10/lb in conventional reactors to $5.00/lb for GAC-FBRs) for products that are highly inhibitory such as epoxides. In the GAC-FBR reactor, enhancing the propylene oxide production rate from 120 to 1500 mg/g-cell/h has resulted in the cost reduction to $2.00/lb. Enhancing the production capacity from 1 million lb to 10 million lb/yr has further reduced the cost of production to $1.00/lb.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colby, J., Stirling, D. I., and Dalton, H. (1977),Biochem. J. 165, 395–402.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins, I. J., Hammond, R. C, Sariaslani, F. S., Best, D., Davies, M. M, Tryhorn, S. E., and Taylor, F. (1979),Biochem. Biophy. Res. Commun. 89, 671–677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hou, C. T., Patel, R. N. Laskin, A. I. (1979),FEMS Micro Letts. 9, 267–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Higgins, I. J., Best, I. J., Hammond, R. C, and Scott, D. (1981),Microorganism Microbiol. Rev. 45, 556–589.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hou, C. T., Patel, R. N., Laskin, A. I., and Barnabe, N. (1982),J. Appl. Biochem. 4, 379–383.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, J., Soni, B. K., and Kelley, R. L. (1996a),Biotechnol. Lett. 8, 897–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J., Soni, B. K., and Kelley, R. L. (1996b),Biotechnol. Lett. 8, 903–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill, A. H., Kelley, R. L., Srivastava, V. J., Akin, C., and Hayes, T. D. (1991), inGas, Oil, Coal and Environmental Biotechnology, vol. III. pp. 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Voice, T. C, Pak, D., Zhao, J. Shi, and Hickey, R. F. (1992),Water Res. 26(10), 1389–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hickey, R. F., Wagner, D., and Mazewski, G. (1991),Remediation 2, 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeris, J. S., Owens, R. W., Hickey, R. F., and Flood, F. (1977),JWPCF 49, 816–831.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hickney, R. F. (personal communication, Michigan Biotechnology Institute, 1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soni, B.K., Kelley, R.L. & Srivastava, V.J. Technical and economic evaluation of different reactors for methanotrophic cultures for propylene oxide production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 70, 651–659 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920176

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920176

Index Entries

Navigation