Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 137–147 | Cite as

The association of default risk factors with the systematic risk of corporate bonds

  • Richard M. Duvall
  • R. S. Rathinasamy


This study examines the association between bond betas and default risk factors. We find that both long-term debt and the relative ratio of long-term debt to short-term debt increase the bond beta; two measures of profitability, net income/total assets and EBIT/total assets and a cash flow measure of cash flow from operations/total assets decrease the bond beta. A proxy measure of standard deviation of returns is also significantly negatively related to bond betas, confirming the prediction from the option pricing model. In addition, by using new cash flow measures in the discriminant analysis, we improve on the successful prediction rate of bond ratings.


Cash Flow Total Asset Percent Level Systematic Risk Default Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Belkaoui, Ahmed. “Industrial Bond Ratings: A New Look.”Financial Management 9 (Autumn 1980): 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duvall, Richard M., andJohn M. Cheney. “Bond Beta and Default Risk.”Journal of Financial Research 7, no. 3 (Fall 1984): 243–254.Google Scholar
  3. Galai, Dan, andRonald W. Masulis. “The Option Pricing Model and the Risk Factor of Stock.”Journal of Financial Economics 3 (January/March 1976): 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Geske, Robert. “The Valuation of Corporate Liabilities as Compound Options.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 12 (November 1977): 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horrigan, James O. “The Determinants of Long Term Credit Standing with Financial Ratios.”Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies, Supplement to Journal of Accounting Research (1966): 44–62.Google Scholar
  6. Kaufman, George G. “Duration, Planning Period and Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model.”The Journal of Financial Research 3 (Spring 1980): 1–9.Google Scholar
  7. Livingston, Miles. “Duration and Risk Assessment for Bonds and Common Stocks: A Note.”Journal of Finance 33 (March 1978): 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Loviscek, Anthony L., andFrederick D. Crowley. “What Is in a Municipal Bond Rating?”Financial Review 25, no. 1 (February 1990): 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McEnally, Richard W. “Risk Premium Curves for Different Classes of Long-Term Securities, 1950–66: Comment.”The Journal of Finance 27 (September 1972): 933–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pinches, George E., andKent A. Mingo. “The Role of Subordination and Industrial Bond Ratings.”Journal of Finance 30 (March 1975): 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reilly, Frank K., andMichael D. Joehnk. “The Association Between Market-Determined Risk Measures for Bonds and Bond Ratings.”Journal of Finance 31 (December 1976): 1387–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Soldofsky, Robert M., andRoger L. Miller. “Risk-Premium Curves for Different Classes of Long-Term Securities, 1950–66.”Journal of Finance 24 (June 1969): 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Weinstein, Mark I. “The Systematic Risk of Corporate Bonds.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16 (September 1981): 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. — “Bond Systematic Risk and the Option Pricing Model.”Journal of Finance 38, no. 5 (December 1983): 1415–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. West, Richard R. “An Alternative Approach to Predicting Corporate Bond Ratings.”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1970): 118–127.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard M. Duvall
    • 1
  • R. S. Rathinasamy
    • 2
  1. 1.Belmont CollegeNashville
  2. 2.Ball State UniversityMuncie

Personalised recommendations