The Botanical Review

, Volume 6, Issue 11, pp 575–598 | Cite as


  • J. M. Webber


Botanical Review Multiple Embryo Adventitious Embryo Morphic Embryo Polyembryonic Seed 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Åkerberg, Erik. Apomictic and sexual seed formation inPoa pratensis. Hereditas25: 359–370. 1939.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, Alice M. Development of the female gametophyte and caryopsis ofPoa pratensis andPoa compressa. Jour. Agr. Res.34: 1001–1018. 1927.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong, J. M. A cytological study of the genusPoa. Canad. Jour. Res.15: 281–297. 1937.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arndt, C. H. Notes on polyembryony and multiple shoots from the seeds inMangifera indica. Amer. Jour. Bot.22: 26–30. 1935.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ayyangar, G. N. R., andKrishnaswami, N. Polyembryony inElusine coracana (Gaertn.), Ragi. Madras Agr. Jour.18: 593–595. 1930.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayliss, R. On the cytology and embryology ofSolanum citrullifolium A. Br. andSolanum Balbsisii Hort. Jour. Inst. Bot. Acad. Sci. Ukraine25: 113–117. 1938. [Original not seen. Abstract in Pl. Breed. Abs.9: 216. 1939.]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beasley, J. O. The production of polyploids inGossypium. Jour. Hered:31: 39–48. 1940.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergström, Ingrid. Tetraploid apple seedlings obtained from the progeny of triploid varieties. Hereditas24: 210–215. 1938.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchholz, John T. Embryo development and polyembryony in relation to the phylogeny of conifers. Amer. Jour. Bot.7: 125–145. 1920.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    — Origin of cleavage polyembryony in conifers. Bot. Gaz.81: 55–71. 1926.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    — The embryogeny of conifers. Proc. Int. Cong. Pl. Sci.1: 359–392. 1929.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    — The suspensor ofSciadopitys. Bot. Gaz.92: 243–262. 1931.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    — The embryogeny ofChamaecyparis obtusa. Amer. Jour. Bot.19: 230–238. 1932.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    — The suspensor ofCryptomeria japonica. Bot. Gaz.93: 221–226. 1932.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    — Determinate cleavage polyembryony, with special reference toDacrydium. Bot. Gaz.94: 579–588. 1933.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    — The morphology and embryogeny ofSequoia gigantea. Amer. Jour. Bot.26: 93–101. 1939.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    — The embryogeny ofSequoia sempervirens with a comparison of the sequoias. Amer. Jour. Bot.26: 248–257. 1939.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chakravarthy, R. S. Nucellar polyembryony in the Rutaceae. Current Sci. (Bangalore)5: 202–203. 1936.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chapman, Marjorie. The ovule and embryo sac inSaxifraga virginiensis. Amer. Jour. Bot.20: 151–158. 1933.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clare, Tema Shults, andJohnstone, George R. Polyembryony and germination of polyembryonic coniferous seeds. Amer. Jour. Bot.18: 674–683. 1931.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cook, Phyllis L. A new type of embryogeny in the conifers. Amer. Jour. Bot.26: 138–143. 1939.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cook, R. C. A haploid marglobe tomato. Practical application of a “short cut” for making pure lines. Jour. Hered.27: 433–435. 1936.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coulter, John M., and Chamberlain, Charles J. Morphology of the angiosperms. 1909.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Créte, Pierre La polyembryonie chez leLobelia syphilitica L. Bull. Soc. Bot. France85: 580–583. 1938.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Darlington, C. D. Recent advances in cytology. 2nd Ed. 1937.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dermen, H. Aposporic parthenogenesis in a triploid apple,Malus hypehenis. Jour. Arn. Arb.17: 90–105. 1936.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Doak, Clifton C. Morphology ofCupressus arizonica: gametophytes and embryogeny. Bot. Gaz.98: 808–815. 1937.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Doyle, J., andLooby, W. J. Embryogeny inSaxegothaea and its relation to other podocarps. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc.22: 127–147. 1939.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dutt, N. L., andKrishnaswami, M. K. Observations on male nuclei in the sugarcane. Ind. Jour. Agr. Sci.2: 47–50. 1932.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    —, andSubba Rao, K. S. Observations on the cytology of the sugarcane. Ind. Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 37–56. 1933.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ernst, Alfred. Bastardierung als Ursache der Apogamie im Pflanzenreich. 1918.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frost, H. B. Polyembryony, heterozygosis and chimera inCitrus. Hilgardia1: 365–402. 1926.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frost, H. B. Four newCitrus varieties, the Kara, Kinnow and Wilking mandarins and the Trovita orange. Bull. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta. No. 597. 1935.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frost, H. B. The genetics and cytology ofCitrus. Current Sci. (Bangalore), Special Number-Genetics 24–27. 1938.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    — Nuclllar embryony and juvenile characters in clonal varieties ofCitrus. Jour. Hered.29: 423–432. 1938.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Frost, H. B. In: Webber, H. J.,et al. The Citrus industry. Vol. 1, Ch. 8 and 9. 1940 (In press).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gandhi, S. R. Recent changes in horticultural practices. Madras Agr. Jour.23: 280–282. 1935.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gentscheff, G. Über die pseudogame fortpflanzung beiPotentilla. Genetica20: 398–408. 1938.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gustafsson, Åke. The interrelation of meiosis and mitosis. I. The mechanism of agamospermy. Hereditas25: 289–322. 1939.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Harland, S. C. Haploids in polyembryonic seeds of Sea Island cotton. Jour. Hered.27: 229–231. 1936.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hodgson, R. W., andCameron, S. H. Effects of reproduction by nucellar embryony on clonal characteristics inCitrus. Jour. Hered.29: 417–419. 1938.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Howard, H. W. The size of seeds in diploid and autotetraploidBrassica oleracea L. Jour. Genet.38: 325–340. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hurst, C. C. Embryo sac formation in diploid and polyploid species ofRosa. Pro. Roy. Soc (London)109: 126–148. 1931.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Johnson Arthur M. Polyembryony inEugenia hookeri. Amer. Jour. Bot.23: 83–88. 1936.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    — Seedlings from polyembryonic seeds ofEugenia hookeri. Madroño4: 115–118. 1937.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jeffrey, Edward C. andHaertl, Edwin J. Apomixis inTrillium. La Cellule48: 77–88. 1939.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Juliano, José B. Studies on the morphology of the Meliaceae: I.Sandoricum koetjape (Burm. F.) Merrill. Phil. Agr.23: 11–35. 1934–35.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    — Origin of embryos in the strawberry mango. Phil. Jour. Sci.54: 553–556. 1934.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    — Studies on the morphology of the Meliaceae: II. Sterility in Santol,Sandoricum koetjape (Burm. F.) Merrill. Phil. Agr.23: 253–262. 1934–35.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    — Embryos ofCarabao Mango (Manifera indica L.). Phil. Agr.25: 749–760. 1937.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    —, andOcala, Proceso, E. Floral morphology ofMusa errans (Blanco) Teodoro. var. botoan Teodoro. Phil. Agr.22: 91–116. 1933.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    —, andCuevas, Numeriano L. Floral morphology of the mango (Mangifera indica L.) with special reference to the pico variety from the Philippines. Phil. Agr.21: 449–472. 1932.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kajale, L. B. A case of polyembryony in the Nyctaginaceae,Boerhaavia repanda, Willd. Current Sci. (Bangalor)5: 429. 1937.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    — Embryo and seed development in Nyctaginaceae. I. Studies in the genusBoerhaavia. Jour. Ind. Bot. Soc.17: 243–255. 1938.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kappert, H. Erbliche Polyembryonie beiLinum usitatissimum. Biol. Zentralbl.53: 276–307. 1933.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Karper, R. E., andStephens, J. C. Floral abnormalities in sorghum. Jour. Hered.27: 183–194. 1936.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kasparyan, A. S. Haploids and haplo-diploids among hybrid twin seedling in wheat. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Doklady) U.R.S.S.20: 53–56. 1938.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kausche, G. A. Über einige Anomalien in der Kartoffelblüte. Zeits. Pflanzenk.47: 113–139. 1937.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kihara, H. A diplo-haploid twin plant inTriticum durum. Agr. & Hort., Japan11: 1425–1434. 1936.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kondō, M., andIsshiki, I. Vorkommen von abnormen Reiskörnern die entweder keimlos sind oder zwei Keime besitzen. Ber. Ohara Inst.6: 515–524. 1935.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kostoff, Dontcho. Frequency of polyembryony and chlorophyll deficiency in rye. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Doklady) U.R.S.S.24: 479–482. 1939.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Krishnaswamy, N. Cytological studies in a haploid plant ofTriticum vulgare. Hereditas25: 77–86. 1939.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Krug, C. A., andMendes, J. E. T. A chamada “Polyembryonia” em Coffea. Rev. Agr. S. Paulo10: 43–48. 1935.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Laibach, F. Wuchsstoffversuche mit lebenden Orchideenpollinien. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.51: 336–340. 1933.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    — andMaschmann, E. Über den Wuchsstoff der Orchideenpollinien. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.78: 399–430. 1933.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lamm, R. A contribution to the embryology of the potato. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.31: 217–220. 1937.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    — Notes on a haploid potato hybrid. Hereditas24: 391–396. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lapin, V. K. Concerning the gemotypic homogenous stock for theCitrus trees. Soviet subtropics2: 24–27. 1937. [Russian with brief English summary.]Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    — Voprosu ogibridizatsii tsitrusovykh. Soviet Subtropics4: 34–37. 1938. [Original not seen. Abstract in P1. Breed. Abs.9: 114. 1939.]Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Maheshwari, P. Contributions to the morphology ofEphedra foliata Boiss. I. The development of the male and female gametophytes. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci.1: 586–606. 1935.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Martin, John N., andWatt, John R. Irregular sporogenesis and polyembryony in some Leguminosae. Iowa State Coll. Jour. Sci.8: 303–307. 1934.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mathews, Andrew Clark. The morphological and cytological development of the sporophylls and seed ofJuniperus virginiana L. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.55 7–62. 1939.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Müntzing, Arne. Polyploidy from twin seedlings. Cytologia, Jubilee Vol. 211–227. 1937.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    —. Resultat och erfarenheter från verksamheten vid Sveriges Utsädesförenings kromosomavdelning. Sverig. utsädesfören. Tidskr.48: 299–308. 1938.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    — Note on heteroploid twin plants from eleven genera. Hereditas24: 487–491. 1938.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Namikawa, S., andKawakami, J. On the occurrence of the haploid, triploid and tetraploid plants in twin seedlings of common wheat. Proc. Imp. Acad (Tokyo)10: 668–671. 1934.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nissen, O. Spalteåpringenes störrelse has tvillingplanter med ulike kromosomtall. Bot. Notiser1937: 28–34.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Oppenheimer, Chanan. On citrus fertilization, with special reference to seediness and seedlessness of the Jaffa orange. Hadar (Jaffa)8: 261–267, 291–296. 1935.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Patel, J. S., andNarayama, G.V. A rare instance of polyembryony inArachis hypogoea Willd. Current Sci. (Bangalore)4: 32–33. 1935.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Pijl, Leendert von der. Über die Polyembryonie beiEugenia. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neèr.31: 113–187. 1934.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pratassenja, G. D. Production of polyploid plants, haploid and triploids inPrunus persica. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Doklady) U.R.S.S.22: 348–351. 1939.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ramiah, K., Parthasarthi, N., andRamanujam, S. Haploid plant in rice (Oryza sativa). Current Sci. (Mysore)1: 277–278. 1933.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    ——— Polyembryony in rice (Oryza sativa). Ind. Jour. Agr. Sci.5: 119–124. 1935.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Reeves, R. C. Development of the ovule and embryo sac of alfalfa. Amer. Jour. Bot.17: 239–246. 1930.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Saxton, W. T. Notes on Conifers. VIII. The morphology ofAustrotaxus spicata. Ann. Bot.48: 411–427. 1934.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    — Notes on Conifers. IX. The ovule and embryogeny ofWiddringtonia. Ann. Bot.48: 429–431. 1934.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    — Notes on conifers. X. Some normal and abnormal structures inTaxus baccata. Ann. Bot.50: 519–522. 1936.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Schnarf, Karl. Vergeichende Embryologie der Angiospermen. VIII. [in Linsbauer, Handbuch der pflanzenanatomie. X (2). 1929.]Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sharma, Y. M. L. Gametogenesis and embryogeny ofTamarix ericoides Rottl. Ann. Bot.3: 861–870. 1939.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Skovsted, A. Cytological studies in twin plants. Comp. Rend. Lab. Carlsberg (Copenhague). Ser. Phys.22: 427–446. 1939.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sokol’skaja, B. P. Omnogozarodshevosti simian tsitrusovykh. Soviet Subtropics.4: 66–67. 1938. [Original not seen. Abstract in Pl. Breed. Abs.9: 115. 1939.]Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Soueges, René. Polyembryonie chez lePotentilla reptans L. Bull. Soc. Bot. France82: 381–384. 1935.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Srinivasa, Iyengar G. Life history ofSantalum album. Jour. Ind. Bot. Soc.16: 175–196. 1937.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Stebbins, G. Ledyard, Jr. The significance of polyploidy in plant evolution. Amer. Nat.74: 54–66. 1940.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    — andBabcock, E. B. The effect of polyploidy and apomixis on the evolution of species inCrepis. Jour. Hered.30: 519–530. 1939.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Subba Rao, A. M. A note on the development of the female gametophytes of some Malpighiaceae and polyembryony inHiptage madablota. Current Sci. (Bangalore)6: 280–282. 1937.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Swingle, Walter T. Seed production in sterile Citrus hybrids—Its scientific explanation and practical significance. Mem. Hort. Soc. New York3: 19–21. 1927.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    — Recapitulation of seedling characters by nucellar buds developing in the embryo sac ofCitrus. VI. Int. Cong. Genet. Proc.2: 196–197. 1932.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Torres, Juan P. Polyembryony inCitrus and study of hybrid seedlings. Phil. Jour. Agr.7: 37–58. 1936.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    — Progress report onCitrus hybridization. Propagation. Phil. Jour. Agr.10: 95–119. 1939.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Toxopeus, H. J. De polyembryonie vanCitrus en haar beteekenis voor de culture. Korte meded. Algem. Proefst. Landb. Buitenz8: 1–15. 1930.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Toxopeus, H. J. Ervaringen en resultaten van het in 1928, 1929 en 1930 uitgevoerde kruisingswerk inCitrus. Korte meded. Algem. Proefst. Landb. Breitenz.9: 13 pp. 1931.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Traub, Hamilton P. Artificial control of nucellar embryony inCitrus. Science83: 165–166. 1936.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    — Polyembryony inMyrciaria cauliflora. Bot. Gaz.101: 233–234. 1939.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Traub, Hamilton P., and Robinson, T. Ralph. Improvement of subtropical fruit crops:Citrus. U. S. Dept. Agr. yearbook 749–826. 1937.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Webber, H. J. Effect of selection within apogamic and clonal progenies. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.28: 53–56. 1931.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    — The economic importance of apogamy inCitrus andMangifera. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.28: 57–61. 1931.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    — Variations inCitrus seedlings and their relations to rootstock selection. Hilgardia7: 1–79. 1932.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Webber, J. M. Cytology of twin cotton plants. Jour. Agr. Res.57: 155–160. 1938.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wong, Cheong-Yin. The influence of pollination on seed development in certain varieties ofCitrus. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.37. 1940.In Press.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Woodworth, Robert H. Cytological studies in the Betulaceae. III. Parthenogenesis and polyembryony inAlnus rugosa. Bot. Gaz.89: 402–409. 1930.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wright, N. Pollination and the seediness of marsh grapefruit. Proc. Agr. Soc. Trind. & Tobago37: 51–60. 1937.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Yamazaki, Y. Some notes on twin plants of common wheats. Jap. Jour. Gen.13: 193. 1937.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Yamamoto, Yukio. Ein haplo-diploides Zwillingspaar beiTriticum vulgare Vill. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)50: 573–581. 1936.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    — Über das Vorkommen von triploiden Pflanzen bei Mehrlingskeimlingen vonTriticum vulgare Vill. Cytologia7: 431–436. 1936.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    — (Twin and triple seeded plants and chromosome changes.) Kagaku (Science) Tokyo7: 147–151. 1937. [In Japanese. Pl. Br. Abs.9: 288. 1939.]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1940

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Webber
    • 1
  1. 1.United State Department of AgricultureUSA

Personalised recommendations