Microgravity Science and Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 5–6, pp 148–153 | Cite as

Survival of microorganisms representing the three Domains of life inside the International Space Station

  • Francesco Canganella 
  • Giovanna Bianconi 


The present work was mainly focused to study the response of representative non pathogenic microorganisms to the environment inside the space vehicle at different mission stages (10, 56, and 226 days) within the frame of the Italian ENEIDE mission, from Feb to Oct 2005. Microorganisms were chosen according to their phylogenetic position and cell structures; they were representatives of the three taxonomic domains and belonged to different ecosystems (food, soil, intestinal tract, plants, deep-sea). They were the followings: Thermococcus guaymasensis (Domain Archaea); Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Domain Eucarya); Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Rhizobium tropici (Domain Bacteria). As main environmental parameters we were interested in: a) space radiations; b) microgravity; c) temperature. The response of microorganisms was investigated in terms of survival rates, cell structure modifications, and genomic damages. The survival of cells was affected by both radiation doses and intrinsec cell features. As expected, only samples kept on the ISS for 226 days showed significant levels of mortality. Asfar as regard the effect on cell structures, these samples showed also remarkable morphological changes, particularly for Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The data collected allowed to get new insights into the biological traits of microorganisms exposed to space environment during the flight on a spacecraft. Moreover, the result obtained may be important for the improvement of human conditions aboard space vehicles (nutraceuticals for astronauts and disinfections of ISS modules) and also for the potential development of closed systems devoted to vegetable productions and organic recycling.


Archaea Enterococcus Faecium International Space Station Space Radiation Magnetospirillum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Canganella F., Vettraino A.M., Trovatelli L.D.. The extremophilic microorganisms: ecology and agro-industrial applications (engl. transl.). Annali di Microbiologia ed Enzimologia vol. 45, pp. 173–184 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Podar M., Reysenbach A.L.. New opportunities revealed by biotechnological explorations of extremophiles. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. May 13; [Epub ahead of print (2006).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Woese C.R., Kandler O., Wheelis M.L.. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sciences vol. 87, pp. 4576–4579 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wiegel J., Canganella F.. Extreme thermophiles. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, Nature Publishing Group (2000).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leys N.M., Hendrickx L., De Boever P., Baatout S., Mergeay M.. Space flight effects on bacterial physiology. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents vol. 18, pp. 193–1999 (2004).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takahashi A., Ohnishi K., Takahashi S., Masukawa M., Sekikawa K., Amano T., Nakano T., Nagaoka S., Ohnishi T.. The effects of microgravity on induced mutation inEscherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Space Res. Vol. 28, pp. 555–61 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horneck G., Bucker H., Reitz G.. Long-term survival of bacterial spores in space. Adv. Space Res. vol. 14, pp. 41–45 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hashimoto H., Koike J., Yamashita M., Oshima T.. Space Agriculture for Manned Mars Exploration and Planetary Protection. Biol. Sci. Space vol. 19, pp. 112–113 (2005).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goossens O., Vanhavere F., Leys N., De Boever P., O’sullivan D., Zhou D., Spurny F., Yukihara E.G., Gaza R., McKeever S. W.. Radiation dosimetry for microbial experiments in the International Space Station using different etched track and luminescent detectors. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. vol. 120, pp. 433–437 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urban J.E.. Adverse effects of microgravity on the magnetotactic bacteriumMagnetospirillum magnetotacticum. Acta Astronautica vol. 47, pp. 775–780 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faiardo-Cavazos P., Link L., Melosh H.J., Nicholson W.L..Bacillus subtilis spores on artificial meteorites survive hypervelocity atmospheric entry: implications for Lithopanspermia. Astrobiology vol. 5, pp. 726–736 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Canganella F, Jones JW, Gambacorta A. and Antranikian G.. Thermococcus guaymasensis sp. nov. and Thermococcus aggregans sp. nov., two novel thermophilic archaea isolated from the Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vent site. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology vol. 48, pp. 1181–1185 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Novikova N.D., Polikarpov N.A., Poddubko S.V., Deshevaya E.A.. The results of Microbiological Research of Environmental Microflora of Orbital Station MIR. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Environmental Systems. July 9–12, 2001, Orlando, Fl., CD 2001-01-2310(2001).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novikova N.D., Polikarpov N.A., Poddubko S. V., Deshevaya E.A.. Microbial Monitoring in Confined Habitat: a review. Presented at the 52nd International Astronautical Congress, Toulouse, France, October 1–5,2001, CDIAA/IAF-01-G.4.08 (2001).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Banat I. M., Makkar R. S., Cameotra S. S.. Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. vol. 53, pp. 495–508 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perfumo A., Banat I., Canganella F., Marchant R.. Rhamnolipid production by a novel thermophilic hydrocarbon-degrading Pseudomonas aeruginosa AP02-1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. vol. 72, pp. 132–138 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perfumo A., Di Mattia E., Canganella F.. Microbial nanobiotechnologies for environmental and medical applications (engl. transl.). Rivista Italiana di Compositi e Nanotecnologie vol. 1, pp. 31–44 (2005).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Z-Tec Publishing, Bremen 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Agrobiology and AgrochemistryMarine Microbiology Lab CONISMA and Research Group on ExoAgroBiology, University of TusciaViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations