Strontium hydrogeochemistry of thermal groundwaters from Baikal and Xinzhou

  • Wang Yanxin 
  • Shen Zhaoli 
  • Moisevich Shpeyzer Grigorii 


This paper reports our work on the strontium hydrogeochemistry of thermal groundwaters in the Baikal Rift System (BRS) in Russia and Mongolia and the Xinzhou basin of the Shanxi Rift System (SRS) in northern China. Though similar in geological background, groundwaters from the BRS and the Xinzhou basin have different strontium isotope compositions. Both the strontium contents and the87Sr/86Sr ratios of thermal water samples from Xinzhou are higher than those of most samples from Baikal. The major reason is the difference in hostrock geochemistry. The hostrocks of the Xinzhou waters are Archaean metamorphic rocks, while those of the Baikal waters except the Kejielikov spring are Proterozoic or younger rocks. In the study areas, cold groundwaters usually show lower87Sr/86Sr ratio due to shorter water-rock interaction history and lower equilibration degree. Strontium hydrogeochemistry often provides important information about mixing processes. Ca/Sr ratio can be used as an important hydrogeochemical parameter. Case studies at Xinzhou show that thermal waters with lowest Ca/Sr ratios are most weakly affected by mixing with shallow groundwaters, as supported by our hydrochemical and sulfur isotope studies.


strontium isotope groundwater hydrogeology water-rock interactions Baikal Shanxi 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Plusnin, G. C., Genesis of hydrothermal fluids of the Baikal Rift Zone using isotopic data, (in Russian with English abstract), Geochemistry, 1978, 9: 481–487.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaudhuri, S., Clauer, N., Strontium isotope compositions and potassium and rubidium contents of formation water in sedimentary basins: Clues to the origin of the solutes, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1993, 57: 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lyons, W. B., The use of strontium isotopes in determining groundwater mixing and brine fingering in a playa spring zone, Lake Terrell, Australia, Journal of Hydrology, 1995, 167: 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson, T. M., DePaolo, D. J., Rapid exchange effects in isotope ratios in groundwater systems, Water Resources Research, 1997, 33: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pampura, V. D., Sandimirova, G. P., Geochemistry and strontium isotope composition in hydrothermal systems, Novosiberiask: Nauka (in Russian), 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elderfield, H., Greaves, M., Strontium isotope geochemistry of Icelandic geothermal systems and implications for sea-water chemistry. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1981, 45: 2201–2212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, Y., Shpeyzer, G. M., Hydrogeochemistry of mineral waters from rift systems on the east Asia continent: case studies in Shanxi and Baikal (in Chinese with English abstract), China Environmental Science Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mazor E., Drever, J. I., Finley, J., et al., Hydrochemical implications of groundwater mixing: an example from the southern Laramie Basin, Wyomin, Water Resources Research, 1993, 29: 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wang Yanxin 
    • 1
  • Shen Zhaoli 
    • 2
  • Moisevich Shpeyzer Grigorii 
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Hydrogeology and Environmental EngineeringChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Water Resource and Environmental EngineeringChina University of GeosciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Laboratory of Hydrochemistry and Ecology StudiesIrkutsk State UniversityIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations