Advertisement

Benchmark results on the linearized equations of motion of an uncontrolled bicycle

  • A. L. Schwab
  • J. P. Meijaard
  • J. M. Papadopoulos
Article

Abstract

In this paper we present the linearized equations of motion for a bicycle as, a benchmark The results obtained by pencil-and-paper and two programs are compaied The bicycle model we consider here consists of four rigid bodies, viz a rear frame, a front frame being the front fork and handlebar assembly, a rear wheel and a fiont wheel, which are connected by revolute joints The contact between the knife-edge wheels and the flat level surface is modelled by holonomic constiaints in the normal direction and by non-holonomic constraints in the longitudinal and lateral direction The rider is rigidly attached to the rear frame with hands free from the handlebar This system has three degrees of freedom, the roll, the steer, and the forward speed For the benchmark we consider the linearized equations for small perturbations of the upright steady forward motion The entries of the matrices of these equations form the basis for comparison Three diffrent kinds of methods to obtain the results are compared pencil-and-paper, the numeric multibody dynamics program SPACAR, and the symbolic software system AutoSim Because the results of the three methods are the same within the machine round-off error, we assume that the results are correct and can be used as a bicycle dynamics benchmark

Key Words

Vehicle Dynamics Non-Holonomic Constraints Dynamic Stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Besscling, J F, 1964, “The Complete Analogy Between the Matrix Equations and the Continuous Field Equations of Stiuctural Analysis,” inInternational Symposium on Analogue and Digital Techniques Applied to Aeronautics Proceedings, Presses Académiques E.uropéennes, Bruxelles, pp 223–242Google Scholar
  2. Caivallo, M E, 1901, “Théorie du mouvement du Monocycle et de la Bicyclette,”Journal de L’Ecole Polytechnique, Series 2, Part 1, Volume 5, “Cerceau et Monocyle,” 1900 pp 119–188, Part 2, Volume 6, “Théorie de la Bicyclette,” pp 1–118Google Scholar
  3. Den Hartog, J P, 1948,Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York and LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Dohring, E, 1955, “Stability of Single-Track Vehicles,” (Translated by J Lotsof, March 1957) Technical leport, Institut für Fahrzeugtechnik, Technische Hochschule Biaunschweig, Forschung Ing-Wes 21(2), pp 50–62Google Scholar
  5. Hand, R S, 1988,Comparisons and Stability Analysis of Linearized Equations of Motion for a Basic Bicycle Model, MSc Thesis, Cornell Univ ersityGoogle Scholar
  6. Jonker, J B, 1988, A Finite Element Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Spatial Mechanisms and Manipulators, PhD Thesis, Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  7. Jonker, J B and Meijaard, J P, 1990, “SPACAR — Computer Program for Dynamic Anaysis of Flexible Spatial Mechanisms and Manipulator,” inMultibody Systems Handbook, W Schiehlen (ed), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 123–143Google Scholar
  8. Kane, T R, 1968,Dynamics, Holt, Rmehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Kane, T R, 1975, “Fundamental Kinematic Relationships for Single-Track Vehicles,”International Journal for Mechanical Sciences 17, pp 499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein, F, and Sommerfeld, A, 1897,Über die Theorie des Kreisels, (Chapter IX, Section 8, “Stabilitat des Fahrrads,” 1910, pp 863–884), Teubner, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  11. Meijaaid, J P, 1991, “Direct Determination of Periodic Solutions of the Dynamical Equations of Flexible Mechanisms and Manipulators,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 32, pp 1691–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neimaik, Ju I and Fufaev, N A, 1972,Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems, (Translated from the Russian edition, Nauka, Moscow, 1967), A M S, Providence RIGoogle Scholar
  13. Papadopoulos, J M, 1987, “Bicycle Steering Dynamics and Self-Stability. a Summary Report on Work in Progress,”Technical report, Cornell Bicycle Research Project, pp 1–23 (availabe at http //tam Cornell edu/ruina/hplab/bicycles html)Google Scholar
  14. Rankine, W J M, 1869, “On the Dynamical Principles of the Motion of Velocipedes,”The Engineer, 28, pp 79, 129, 153, 175Google Scholar
  15. Society of Automotive Engineers, 2001, “Vehicle Dynamics Terminology-SAE J670e,” 2007SAE Handbook, SAE international, Wanendale, PAGoogle Scholar
  16. Sayers, M W, 1991, “Symbolic Computer Language for Multibody Systems,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, pp 1153–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sayers, M W, 1991, “Symbolic Vector/Dyadic Multibody Formalism for Tree-Topology Systems,”Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 14, pp 1240–1250MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwab, A L and Meijaard, J P, 2003, “Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems with Non-Holonomic Constraints A Finite Element Approach,”Multibody System Dynamics 10, pp 107–123MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwab, A L, 2002,Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems, Ph D Thesis, Delft University of Technology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwab, A L and Merjaard, J P, 1999, “The Belt, Gear, Bearing and Hinge as Special Finite Elements for Kinematic and Dynamic Analysis of Mechanisms and Machines,” in Lemonen, T (ed),Proceedings of the Tenth World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, IFToMM, June 20–24, 1999, Oulu, Finland, Oulu University Press, Vol 4, pp 1375–1386Google Scholar
  21. Schwab, A L and Meijaard, J P, 1999, “Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems having Rolling Contact Application of the Wheel Element to the Dynamics of Road Vehicles,”Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 33, pp 338–349Google Scholar
  22. Sharp, R S, 1971, “The Stability and Control of Motorcycles,”Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 13(5), pp 316–329CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Steele, G L, Jr, 1990 Common Lisp, The Language, 2nd ed, Digital Press, USA.MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Timoshenko, S and Young, D H, 1948, Advanced Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Der Werff, K., 1977,Kinematic and Dynamic Analysis of Mechanisms, a Finite Element Approach. Ph D Thesis, Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  26. Weir, D H, 1972,Motorcycle Handling Dynamics and Rider Control and the Effect of Design Configuration on Response and Performance, Ph D Thesis, University of California, LAGoogle Scholar
  27. Weir, D H and Zellner, J W, 1978, “Lateral-Dnectional Motorcycle Dynamics and Rider Control,” Technical report 780304, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PAGoogle Scholar
  28. Whipple, F J W, 1899, “The Stability of the Motion of a Bicycle,”The Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 30, pp 312–348MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (KSME) 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. Schwab
    • 1
  • J. P. Meijaard
    • 2
  • J. M. Papadopoulos
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory for Engineering MechanicsDelft University of TechnologyCD DelftNetherlands
  2. 2.School of MMMEThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  3. 3.The Paper Converting Machine CompanyWisconsinUSA

Personalised recommendations