The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 105–118 | Cite as

Nerological status of the newborn in relation to prenatal and perinatal factors

  • T. V. Deshpande
  • P. G. R. Harding
Original Articles


Assessment of 180 high risk newborns revealed significant impairment of the neurological status compared to the control group; the degree of impairment was related to the number and severity of the adverse factors. In addition to the perinatal factors, prenatal factors were also related to the low neurological score. In the high risk group, the chief neurologic pathology evidenced as poor muscle tone in the term infants and poor vigilance in the preterm infants. The neurological score showed better correlation to the arterial pH and base status as compared to the oxygen content. The adverse effect of hypoxia was more persistent in the term infants than in the preterm infants. The bilirubin level of 8 to 15 mg/dl did not significantly influence the neurological status of the newborns. Some high risk infants with normal Apgar score had significantly low neurological score even on the fourth day after birth, compared to the control group.

Key words

High risk neurological status Perinatal Pestinatal factors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adamsons K, Myers RE: Perinatal asphyxia causes detection and neurologic sequelae. PCNA 20:465, 1973Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amiel Tison C: Neurologic disorders in neonates associated with abnormalities of pregnancy and birth.In, Current Medical Publishers Inc. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banker B: The neuropathological effects of anoxia and hypoglycemia in the newborn. Develop Med Child Neurol 9: 544, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berendes HW: Fetal distress: Its significance in neurological and mental impairment of childhood. Perinatal factors affecting human development. Proc. of 8th Meeting of the P.A.H.O. (W.H.O.) 1969. p 228Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Myers RE: Two patterns of perinatal brain damage and their conditions of occurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 112: 246, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jilek L: The relation and adaptation of the central nervous system to stagnant hypoxia during cytogeny.In, Developmental Neurology, 1970. Chapter II, p. 358, ed. by WA Himwich, Thomas Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malnud N: Sequelae of perinatal trauma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 13: 141, 1959Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Priestley BL: Neurological assessment of infants of diabetic mothers in the first week of life. Pediatrics 20:578, 1972Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schulte FJ, Schremf G. Hinz G: Maternal toxemia, fetal malnutrition and motor behaviour of the newborn. Pediatrics 48: 871, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amiel Tison C: Cerebral damage of full term newborn. Aetiological factors, neonatal states and long term followup. Biol Neonate 14: 234, 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berendes HW, James LS, Myers RE, Gaull GE: (Eds) Brain Damage in Fetus and Newborn from Hypoxia. Columbia Ohio Rose Laboratories, 1967Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saint Anne Dargassies S: The full term newborn neurological assessment. Bio Neonat 4: 174, 1962Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nesbitt R: Perinatal asphyxia.In, Human Development (Philadelphia) W.B. Saunders Company, 1966 p 144Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keith HM, Mildred AN, Hunt HB: Neurologic lesions in relation to the sequelae of birth injury. Neurology 3:139, 1953PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brash AA: The effect of toxemia of pregnancy upon the foetus and newborn child. Arch Dis Child 24:107, 1949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mundo-Vallavta JD, Robb JP: A followup study of newborn infants with perinatal complications, Neurology, Minneap. 14: 413, 1964Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saint Anne Dargassies S: Neurological examination of the neonate section of pediatrics. Proc Royal Soc Med 58: 5, 1955Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prechtl HFR, Beintema D: The neurological examination of the full term newborn infant. Little Club Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 12, 1964Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dubowitz LM, Dubowitz V, Goldberg C Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr 77: 1, 1970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prechtl HFR: Prognostic value of neurological signs in the newborn infant. Proc Royal Society Med 58: 3, 1965Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Windle WF. Asphyxial brain damage at birth, with reference of the minimally affected child. Perinatal factors affecting human development. Proc. of 8th Meeting of the P.A.H.O. (W.H.O.) 1969. p 215Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Birch HG: The perinatal factors in mental subnormality. Perinatal factors affecting human development. Proc. of 8th Meeting of the P.A.H.O. (W.H.O.), 1969 p 45Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Little WJ: The influence of abnormal partuion difficult labours, premature birth and asphyxia neonaturism on the mental and physical condition of the child especially in relation to deformities. Trans Obstet Soc London 3: 293, 1961Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saint Anne Dargassies S: Neuro developmental symptoms during first year of life, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 14: 235, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donovon DE, Cones P, Paine RJ: The prognostic implications of neurologic abnormalities in the neonatal period. Neurology (Minneap) 12: 910, 1962Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. V. Deshpande
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. G. R. Harding
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations