Biologia Plantarum

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 405–410 | Cite as

Alleviation of salinity stress in chickpea byRhizobium inoculation or nitrate supply

  • D. L. N. Rao
  • P. C. Sharma
Original Papers


Influence of inoculation with efficient rhizobia or nitrate fertilization in alleviating salinity (NaCl, CaCl2 and Na2SO4) stress was investigated in sand culture experiments. Shoot dry mass declined beyond salinity level corresponding to electrical conductivity (EC) 5.6 dS m−1 in control or in inoculated plants and after EC 7.4 dS m−1 in nitrate fed ones. Root growth was more sensitive and decreased at EC 3.3 dS m−1. Nitrate reductase activity in leaves reduced at EC 3.3 dS m−1 but in inoculated and nitrate fed plants it reduced at EC 5.6 dS m−1. Na+ accumulation increased at EC 5.6 and 7.4 dS m−1 in roots and, shoots, respectively. In inoculated and nitrate fed plants Na+ content in roots increased at EC 7.4 dS m−1. Content of Ca2+ increased slightly only in shoots and content of K+ was unaffected. Besides inoculation, application of small doses of nitrogen should prove beneficial for legume cultivation in saline soils.

Key words

Cicer arietinum ion accumulation nitrate reductase activity 



days after seeding


electrical conductivity


nitrate reductase


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernstein, L., Ogata, G.: Effects of salinity on nodulation, nitrogen fixation and growth of soybeans and alfalfa.—Agron. J.58: 201–203, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. Bhardwaj, K.K.R.: Survival and symbiotic characteristics ofRhizobium in saline-alkali soils.—Plant Soil43: 377–385, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jaworski, E.G.: Nitrate reductase in intact plant tissues.—Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.43: 1274–1279, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lauter, D.J., Munns, D.N., Clarkin, K.L.: Salt response of chickpea as influenced by N supply.— Agron. J.73: 961–966, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. Pillai, R.N., Sen, A.: Salt tolerance ofRhizobium trifolii.—Indian J. agr. Sci.36: 80–83, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. Rao, D.L.N., Sharma, P.C., Gill, K.S.: Response of pigeonpea to alkalinity stress andRhizobium inoculation.—J. indian Soc. Soil Sci.42: 381–384, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. Rao, D.L.N., Sharma, P.C.: Effectiveness of rhizobial strains for chickpea under salinity stress and the recovery of nodulation on desalinization.—Indian J. exp. Biol.33: (in press), 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Saxena, A.K., Rewari, R.B.: Differential responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)—Rhizobium combinations to saline soil conditions.—Biol. Fertil. Soils13: 31–34, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sharma, P.C., Mali, P.C., Garg, B.K., Vyas, S.P., Kathju, S., Lahiri, A.N.: Interactive effects of soil fertility and salt stress on the activities of certain enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in mustard.— Curr. Sci.58: 390–392, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Sharma, S.K.: Effect of salinity on internal distribution of Na+, K+ and Cl and the mechanism of salt injury in chickpea.—Plant Physiol. Biochem.17: 41–47, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. Subbarao, G.V., Johansen, C., Jana, M.K., Kumar Rao, J.V.D.K.: Comparative salinity tolerance of symbiotically dependent and nitrogen-fed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and its wild relativeAtylosia platycarpa.—Biol. Fertil. Soils.10: 11–16, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Velagaletti, R.R., Marsh, S.: Influence of host cultivars andBradyrhizobium strains on the growth and symbiotic performance of soybean under salt stress.—Plant Soil119: 133–138, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilson, J.R.: Response to salinity in Glycine: VI. Some effects of a range of short term salt stress on the growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation ofGlycine wightii—Aust. J. agr. Res.21: 571–582, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Experimental Botany, ASCR 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. L. N. Rao
    • 1
  • P. C. Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Soil Salinity Research InstituteKarnalIndia

Personalised recommendations