Advertisement

Chesapeake Science

, 16:115 | Cite as

The floristic composition and structure of foredune plant communities of cape hatteras national seashore

  • A. G. van der Valk
Article

Abstract

Plant communities on the front, top, and back of the foredunes were examined at 22 randomly chosen sites. One or more species of grass (Uniola paniculata, Ammophila breviligulata, Panicum amarum) dominate most of the communities, except a few on the top and back of the foredune at Ocracoke Island which are dominated byHydrocotyle bonariensis. Principal component factor analyses and cluster analyses revealed that different community types have developed on the front, top, and back of the dune system. On the average, communities on the front and top of the foredune are significantly different structurally from communities on the back in the number of species per stand (10.2, 11.4, and 19.0 respectively) and in their Shannon-Wiener diversities (1.18, 1.25, and 1.44), but are not significantly different in their Simpson dominance indices (0.41, 0.41 and 0.37). An analysis of the communities which have developed on a series of experimental dune sections on Ocracoke Island revealed that the method used to build a dune has a lasting influence on the type of plant community which is subsequently formed. This appears to be the result of differences in the amount of cover and distribution of the dominant grasses which determine the pattern of accumulation and shifting of sand. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A00BY058 00004

Keywords

Salt Spray General Survey Principal Component Factor Analysis Sand Movement Outer Bank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Au, Shu Fun. 1969. Vegetation and ecological process on Schakleford Bank, North Carolina. Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 188 p.Google Scholar
  2. Auclair, A. N., andF. G. Goff. 1971. Diversity relations of upland forests in the western Great Lakes area.Amer. Nat. 105:499–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyce, S. G. 1951. Source of atmospheric salts.Science 113:620–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. — 1951. The salt spay community.Ecol. Monogr. 24:29–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1932. Plant sociology. (Trans. G. D. Fuller and H. S. Conard.) Reprinted in 1965 by Hafner Publishing Company; New York. 439 p.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, J. R., andJ. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin.Ecol. Monogr. 27:325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, C. A. 1959. Vegetation of the Outer Banks of North Carolina. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, La 179 p.Google Scholar
  8. Burk, C. J. 1961. A floristic study of the Outer Banks of North Carolina. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 129 p.Google Scholar
  9. — 1962. The North Carolina Outer Banks: a floristic interpretation.J. Elisha Mitchell Soc. 78:21–28.Google Scholar
  10. Carmichael, J. W., J. A. George, andR. S. Julius. 1968. Finding natural clusters.Systematic Zool. 17:144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carney, C. B. 1955. Weather and climate in North Carolina. North Carolina State College Agriculatural Experiment Station Bulletin 396, Raleigh, N.C. 47 p.Google Scholar
  12. Engels, W. L. 1942. Vertebrate fauna of North Carolina coastal islands: a study in the dynamics of animal distribution. I. Ocracoke Island.Am. Midl. Nat. 28:273–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorham, E. 1958. Soluble salts in dune sands from Blakeney Point, Norfolk.J. Ecol. 46:373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hewett, D. G. 1970. The colonization of sand dunes after stabilization with marram grass (Ammophila areneria).J. Ecol. 58:653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hnatiuk, R. J. 1969. ThePinus contorta vegetation of Banff and Jasper National Parks. M. Sc. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 317 p.Google Scholar
  16. Kearney, T. H. 1900. The plant covering of Ocracoke Island.Contr. Nat. Herb. 5:261–319.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, I. F. 1917. The vegetation of Schakleford Banks, Carteret County, N. C..North Carolina Geol. Surv. Econ. Paper 46:1–36.Google Scholar
  18. Lloyd, M., andR. T. Ghelardi. 1964. A table for calculating the “equitability” component of species diversity.J. Anim. Ecol. 33:217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lucas, L. T., T. B. Warren, W. W. Woodhouse, andE. E. Seneca. 1971. Marasmius blight, a new disease of American beachgrass.Plant Disease Reporter 55:582–585.Google Scholar
  20. McNaughton, S. J. 1968. Structure and functoon in California grasslands.Ecology 49:962–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin, W. E. 1959. The vegetation of Island Beach State Park, New Jersey.Ecol. Monogr. 29:1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monk, C. D. 1967. Tree species diversity in the eastern deciduous forest with particular reference to north central Florida.Amer. Nat. 101:173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nie, N., D. H. Bent, andC. H. Hull. 1970. Statistical package for the social sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, N. Y. 343 p.Google Scholar
  24. Oosting, H. J. 1945. Tolerance to salt spray of plants of coastal dunes.Ecology 26:85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. —. 1942. Factors affecting vegetational zonation on coastal dunes.Ecology 23:131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, andC. R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 183 p.Google Scholar
  27. Ranwell, D. S. 1958. Movement of vegetated sand dunes at Newborough Warren, Anglesey.J. Ecol. 46:83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ream, R. R. 1962. A standard computer program for determining the index of similarity among vegetation stands.Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 43:98.Google Scholar
  29. Salisbury, E. J. 1934. On the day temperatures of sand dunes in relation to the vegetation at Blakeney Point, Norfolk.Trans. Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society 13:333–355.Google Scholar
  30. Sanders, H. L. 1968. Benthic diversity: a comparative study.Amer. Nat. 102:243–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Savage, R. P., andW. W. Woodhouse. 1968. Creation and stabilization of coastal barrier dunes. Proc. Eleventh Conference on Coastal Engineering, London, p. 671–700. American Society of Civil Engineers, 1969.Google Scholar
  32. Service, J. 1972. A user’s guide to the stastical analysis system. Student Supply Store, North Carolina State University, Raleight, North Carolina. 260 p.Google Scholar
  33. Slobodkin, L. B., and H. L. Sanders. 1969. On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity, p. 82–95.In Woodwell, G. M. and H. H. Smith (eds.). Diversity and stability in ecological systems. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology.Google Scholar
  34. Stratton, A. C. 1943. Reclaiming North Carolina Banks.Shore and Beach 11:25–27.Google Scholar
  35. van der Valk, A. G. 1973. Ecological investigations of the foredune vegetation of Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Ph.D. thesis, N.C. State U. Raleigh, N. C. 141 p.Google Scholar
  36. — 1974. Environmental factors controlling the distribution of forbs on foredunes in Cape Hatteras National Seashore.Can. J. Bot. 52:1057–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —. 1971. Hydrarch succession and net primary production of oxbow lakes in central Alberta.Can. J. Bot. 49:1177–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wagner, R. H. 1964. Ecology ofUniola paniculata in the dune-strand habitat of North Carolina.Ecol. Monogr. 34:79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Waughman, G. T. 1972. Acetylene reduction method assay for nitrogen fixation in sand dunes.Oikos 23:206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wells, B. W. 1939. A new forest climax: the salt spray climas of Smith Island, North Carolina.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 66:629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitaker, R. H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities.Science 147:250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. — 1972. Evolution and measurements of species diversity.Taxon 21:213–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willis, A. J. 1963. Braunton Burrows: the effects on the vegetation of the addition of mineral nutrients to the dune soils.J. Ecol. 51:353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. —. 1959. Brauton Burrows: the dune system and its vegetation I and II.J. Ecol. 47:1–24; 249–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. —. 1961. Braunton Burrows: mineral nutrient status of the dune soils.J. Ecol. 49:377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Woodhouse, W. W., andR. E. Hanes. 1966. Dune stabilization with vegetation on the Outer Banks of North Carolina. Soils Information Series 8, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. 50 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. van der Valk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleigh

Personalised recommendations