Advertisement

Geosciences Journal

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 117–127 | Cite as

Eustatic versus tectonic control on the development of Neoproterozoic and Cambrian stratigraphic sequences of the Lublin-Podlasie Basin (SW margin of Baltica)

  • Jolanta Pacześna
  • Paweł Poprawa
Article

Abstract

A sequence stratigraphy is applied for the Neoproterozoic to Cambrian sedimentary fill of the Lublin-Podlasie Basin (LPB). The main goal of the study is to discriminate between eustatic and tectonic control on the development of sedimentary sequences. The Neoproterozoic and Cambrian sedimentary succession is subdivided into two second-order depositional sequences, separated by a major regional unconformity. The lower sequence A is poorly recognised. It is presumably of the early Neoproterozoic age and is characterized by continental to coastal shallow marine deposition. Sequence B comprises a time span of the (?late Neoproterozoic) to Middle Cambrian. The lowermost part of the sequence B is composed of a lowstand system tract (LST). A low relative sea-level (RSL), associated to the LST development, was controlled by regional thermal doming, followed by a rapid clastic and volcanogenic deposition, exceeding rate of subsidence of extensional grabens. The terminal Ediacaran was a time of a transgressive system tract I (TST I) development. Increase of the RSL was induced by a transition from syn-rift to post-rift subsidence. During the development of a following highstand system tract I (HST I) the RSL remained high. Significant local supply of sediments, exceeding in rate the basement subsidence, caused progradation of shoreline. The higher up-section TST II is characterized by gradual increase of the RSL and represents continuing thermal sag phase of the LPB. It was coeval with a global transgression and controlled mainly by eustatic sea level rise. The beginning of the Middle Cambrian corresponds to development of a HST II, controlled by decelerating rate of RSL rise, even though it coincides with the Hawke Bay regression. The HST II is therefore interpreted as controlled by local tectonic processes, superimposed on continued post-rift thermal subsidence of the passive margin.

Key words

Lublin-Podlasie Basin Neoproterozoic Cambrian sequence stratigraphy tectonics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Areń, B., 1982, Lithological and facies development of the upper Vendian in the eastern Poland. Pizeglad Geologiczny, 5, 225–230. (in Polish with English abstract)Google Scholar
  2. Bogdanova, S.V., Pashkevich, I.K., Gorbatschev, R. and Orlyuk, M.I., 1997, Riphean rifting and major Palaeoproterozoic crustal boundaries in the basement of the East European Craton geology and geophysics. Tectonophysics, 268, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, G.C., Nickeson, P.A. and Kominz, M.A., 1984. Breakup of a supercontinent between 625 Ma and 555 Ma: new evidence and implications for continental histories. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 70, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brasier, M., 1980, The Lower Cambrian transgression and glauconite-phosphate facies in western Europe. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 137, 695–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calver, C.R. and Walter, M.R., 2000, The Late Neoproterozoic Grassy Group of King Island, Tasmania: correlation and palaeogeographic significance. Precambrian Research, 100, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Compston, W., Sambridge, M.S., Reinfrank, R.F., Moczydlowska, M., Vidal, G. and Claesson, S., 1995, Numerical ages of volcanic rocks and the earlies faunal zone within the Late Precambrian of east Poland. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 152, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford, A.J., Stevens, B.P.J. and Fanning, M., 1997, Geochemistry and tectonic setting of some Neoproterozoic and Early Cambrian volcanics in western New South Wales. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 26, 353–361.Google Scholar
  8. Eriksson, P.G., Condie, K.C., Tirsgaard, H., Mueller, W.U., Altermann, W., Miall, A.D., Aspler, L.B., Catuneanu, O. and Chiarenzelli, J.R. 1998. Precambrian clastic sedimentation systems. Sedimentary Geology, 120, 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fedo, C.M. and Cooper, J.D., 1990, Braided fluvial to marine transition the basal Lower Cambrian Wood Campon Formation. Southern Marble Mountains, Majave Desert, California. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 60, 220–234.Google Scholar
  10. Fedo, C.M. and Cooper, J.D., 2001, Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of Neoproterozoic and Cambrian units across a craton-margin hinge zone, southeastern California, and implications for the early evolution of the Cordilleran margin. Sedimentary Geology, 141–142, 466–501.Google Scholar
  11. Garetsky, R.G., ed., 1981, Geology of the western part of the East-European Platform Publishing Nauka i Tehnika, Minsk, 188 p.Google Scholar
  12. Garetsky, R.G., Zinovienko, G.V., Visnjakov, I.B., Glusko, V.V., Pomjanovskaja, G.M. and Lvov, G.M., 1987, Die perikratone Baltik-Dnestr-Senkungszone. Zeitschrift für angewandte Geologie, 33, 207–213. (in German)Google Scholar
  13. Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J. and Smith, A.G., eds. 2004, A Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 589 p.Google Scholar
  14. Jaworowski, K., 2000, Facies variability in the Cambrian deposits from the Koscierzyna and Gdansk sections (Pomeranian Caledonides foreland, northern Poland): a comparative study. Geological Quarterly, 44, 249–260.Google Scholar
  15. Lendzion, K., 1983, Biostratigraphy of the Cambrian deposits from the Polish part of the East European Craton. Kwartalnik Geologiczny, 27, 669–694. (in Polish with English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Mahnatsch, A.S., Weretennikov, N.W., Shkuratov, W.I. and Bordon, W.E., 1976, Riphean and Vendian of Belarus Minsk, 358 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. Mens, K.A., 1987, Early Cambrian-Lontova Stage. In: Rozanov, A.Y.U. and Łydka, K. (eds.), Palaeogeography and Lithology of the Vendian and Cambrian of the western East-European Platform. Wydawnictwa Geologiczne, Warszawa, p. 32–37.Google Scholar
  18. Moczydłowska, M., 1991, Acritarch biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian and the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary in southeastern Poland. Fossils and Strata, 29, 97 p.Google Scholar
  19. Moczydłowska, M., 1998, Cambrian acritarchs from Upper Silesia, Poland-biochronology and tectonic implications. Fossils and Strata, 46, 121 p.Google Scholar
  20. Myrow, P.M., 1995, Neoproterozoic rocks of the Newfoundland Avalon Zone. Precambrian Research, 73, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nikishin, A.M., Ziegler, P.A., Stephenson, R.A., Cloethingh, S.A.P.L., Furne, A.V., Foki, P.A., Ershov, A.V., Bolotov, S.N., Korotaev, M.V., Aleekseev, A.S., Gorbachev, V.I., Shipilov, E.V., Lankreijer, A., Bembinova, E.Y.U. and Shalimov, I.V., 1996, Late Permian to Triassic history of the East European Craton: dynamics of sedimentary basin evolution. Tectonophysics, 268, 23–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paczesna, J., 1996, Upper Vendian and Cambrian ichnocoenose from the Polish part of the East European Craton Prace Panstwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, 152, 77 p.Google Scholar
  23. Paczesna, J. 2001, An application of trace fossils in the facies analysis and high-resolution sequence stratigraphy—an example from the Cambrian of the Polish part of the East European Craton. Pizeglad Geologiczny, 49, 1137–1146 (in Polish with English abstract)Google Scholar
  24. Palmer, A.R. and James, N.P., 1980, The Hawke Bay event a circum Iapetus regression near the Lower-Middle Cambrian boundary. In: Wones, D.R. (ed.), The Caledonides in the USA. Virginia Polytechnic Institute State University Department of Geological Sciences Memoir, 2, p. 15–18.Google Scholar
  25. Poprawa, P. and Paczesna, J., 2002, Late Neoproterozoic to Early Paleozoic development of a rift at the Lublin-Podlasie slope of the East European Craton—analysis of subsidence and facies record. Pizeglad Geologiczny, 50, 49–61. (in Polish with English abstract)Google Scholar
  26. Poprawa, P., Šliaupa, S., Stephenson, R.A. and Lazauskiene, J., 1999, Late Vendian-Early Palaeozoic tectonic evolution of the Baltic basin regional implications from subsidence analysis. Tectonophysics, 314, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pożarski, W. and Kotañski, Z., 1979, Tectonic development of the Baikalian and Caledonian-Variscan foreland of the East European Platform in Poland. Geological Quarterly, 23, 7–19. (in Polish)Google Scholar
  28. Rozanov, A.Y.U. and Łydka, K., 1987, Palaeogeography and lithology of the Vendian and Cambrian of the western East European Platform Wydawnictwa Geologiczne, Warsaw, 114 p.Google Scholar
  29. Ryka, W., 1984, Precambrian evolution of the East-European Platform in Poland Biuletyn Instytutu Geologicznego, 347, 17–28.Google Scholar
  30. Semenenko, N.P., ed., 1968, Riphean volcanism and metallization of the western part of the Ukrainian Shield. Publishing Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 172 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  31. Simpson, E.L. and Eriksson, K.A., 1989, Sedimentology of the Unicoi Formation in southern and central Virginia: evidence for late Proterozoic to early Cambrian rift-to-passive margin transition. Journal of Geological Society of America, 101, 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simpson, E.L. and Eriksson, K.A., 1990, Early Cambrian progradational and transgressive sedimentation in Virginia: an example of the early history of a passive margin. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 60, 84–100.Google Scholar
  33. Velikanov, V.A. and Korenchuk, L.V., 1997, Phases of magmatism and their relation to the sediment deposition in the Late Precambrian (Riphean-Vendian) of the Volhyn-Podolia. Geologichny Journal, 1–2, 124–131. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  34. Vidal, G. and Moczydłowska, M., 1995, The Neoproterozoic of Baltica—stratigraphy, palaeobiology and general geological evolution. Precambrian Research, 73, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vidal, G. and Moczydłowska, M., 1996, Vendian-Lower Cambrian acritarch biostratigraphy of the central Caledonian fold belt in Scandinavia and the palaeogeography of the Iapetus-Tornquist seaway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 76, 147–168.Google Scholar
  36. Walter, M.R., Veevers, J.J., Calver, C.R. and Grey, K., 1995, Neoproterozoic stratigraphy of the Centralian Superbasin, Australia. Precambrian Research, 73, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wichrowska, M., 1992, Riphean on cratonic area of Poland. Pizeglad Geologiczny, 2, 94–99 (in Polish with English summary)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Regional and Petroleum GeologyPolish Geological InstituteWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations