Geosciences Journal

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 75–81 | Cite as

Removal of ringing noise in GPR data by signal processing

  • Jung-Ho Kim
  • Seong-Jun Cho
  • Myeong-Jong Yi


Ringing is a common type of coherent noise in ground penetrating radar (GPR) data. When this kind of coherent noise is strong and is not properly removed, deeper structure may be completely masked. Ringing appears as nearly horizontal and periodic events, which are the most important features enabling us to remove the noise by signal processing. In this study, we have reviewed basic principles of various signal processing techniques to remove the ringing noise and compared their performances using field GPR data contaminated by severe ringing noise. The reviewed methods include background removal. f-k filtering, predictive deconvolution with filtering in wavenumber domain, and filtering by radon transform. Furthermore, it is shown that ringing can be successfully removed by the eigenimage filtering method, where GPR image is decomposed into eigenimages by singular value decomposition. This comparative analysis shows that the refined techniques are definitely more effective than the simple methods for the ringing noise removal with less distortion of GPR signals and each method has its own advantage as well as limitations. Moreover, preservation of the horizontally linear events from geological targets can be possible only through a kind of selective or local filtering such as the eigenimage filtering method.

Key words

GPR ringing signal processing f-k filtering deconvolution eigenimage filtering 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cagnoli, B., and Ulrych, T.J., 2001, Singular value decomposition and wavy reflections in ground-penetrating radar images of base surge deposits. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 48, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freire, S.L.M., and Ulrych, T.J., 1988, Application of singular value decomposition to vertical seismic profiling. Geophysics, 53, 778–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerlitz, K., Knoll, D., Cross, G.M., Luzitano, R.D., and Knight, R., 1993, Processing ground penetrating radar data to improve resolution of near-surface targets. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, edited by R.S. Bell, and C.M. Lepper, 2, 561–574, San Diego, USA, Apr. 1993.Google Scholar
  4. Kim, J.-H., Yi, M.-J., Son, J.-S., Cho, S.-J., and Park, S.-G., 2005, Effective 3-D GPR survey and its application to the exploration of old remains. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sending Symposium Proceedings, 2005 IEEE IGARSS, Seoul, Korea, Jul. 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Nobes, D. C., 1999, Geophysical surveys of burial sites: A case study of Oaro urupa. Geophysics, 64, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nuzzo, L. and Quarta, T., 2004, Improvement in GPR coherent noise attenuation using t-p and wavelet transforms. Geophysics, 69, 789–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Xia, J., Franseen, E. K., Miller, R. D., Weis, T. V., and Byrnes, A. P., 2003, Improving ground-penetrating radar data in sedimentary rocks using deterministic deconvolution, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 54, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Young, R. A. and Sun, J., 1999, Revealing stratigraphy in ground-penetrating radar using domain filtering. Geophysics, 64, 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Geophysics GroupKorea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral ResourcesDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations