Advertisement

Biologia Plantarum

, 23:58 | Cite as

Photosynthetic capacity, irradiance and sequential senescence of sugar beet leaves

  • Danuše Hodáňová
Original Papers

Abstract

In field-grown sugar beet plants (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Dobrovická A), each of66 successive leaves produoed in the course of the vegetation period was different with respect to its photosynthetic capaoity (Pc), life span, duration of leaf area expansion, and longevity after its maximum leaf area (Amax) has developed. The proportionality between the seasonal changes in these characteristics was not the same if the sequential senescence of leaves was taken into account. With aging of individual leaves, Pc increased with the leaf area expansion having attained the peak value between 75% to 100% of Amax The rate of ontogenetic changes in Pc of each leaf was specified by the rate of its growth and development so that even at comparable ages the successive leaves constituted a series of different physiological units.

The seasonal changes in quantum irradiance (PAR) were found to be responsible for differences in the growth characteristics between the successive leaves: Leaf expansion period was related with daily integrals of the incoming PAR (Io), while leaf longevity, after the Amax had been attained, was closely linked with PAR intercepted by the canopy (I). Pc expressed per the total leaf area of the plant was significantly correlated withI, while Pc calculated per unit leaf area of the plant was related toI o Leaf potential to adapt Pc correspondingly to changes in PAR was greatest during leaf blade expansion; after the leaf had ceased to expand, changes in Pc were independent of differences in leaf irradiance.

The results stress, at least for field conditions, the inadmissibility of the extrapolation of attributes from one leaf to the other ones sequentially senescing on the plant.

Keywords

Leaf Area Sugar Beet Photosynthetic Capacity Total Leaf Area Unit Leaf Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acock, B., Charles-Edwards, D. A., Fitter, D. J., Hand, D. W., Ludwig, L. J., Warren Wilson, J., Withers, A. C.: The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop to canopy net photosynthesis: An experimental examination of two canopy models. - J. exp. Bot.29: 815–827, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bunce, J. A., Patterson, D. T., Peet, M. M.: Light acclimation during and after leaf expansion in soybean. -Plant Physiol.60: 255–258, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chabot, B. F., Jtjrik, T. W., Chabot, J. F.: Influence of instantaneous and integrated light-flux density on leaf anatomy and photosynthesis. -Amer. J. Bot.66: 940–945, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clough, J. M., Alberts, R. S., Terri, J. A.: Photosynthetic adaptation ofSolatium dulcamara L. to sun and shade environments II. Physiological characterization of phenotypic response to environment. -Plant. Physiol.64: 25–30, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennett, M. D., Elston, J., Milford, J. R.: The effect of temperature on the growth of individual leaves ofVicia faba L. in the field. -Ann. Bot.43: 197–208, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Fick, G. W., Loomis, R. S., Williams, W. A.: Sugar beet. -In:Evans, L. T. (ed.): Crop Physiology. Some Case Histories. Pp. 259–295. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Hackett, C., Rawson, H. M.: An exploration of the carbon economy of the tobacco plant. II. Patterns of leaf growth and dry matter partitioning. -Aust. J. Plant Physiol.1: 271–281, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. Hodáňová, D.: Structure and development of sugar beet canopy I. Leaf area-leaf angle relations.- Photosynthetica6: 401–409, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. Hodáňová, D.: Sugar beet canopy photosynthesis as limited by leaf age and irradiance. Estimation by models.-Photosynthetica13: 376–385, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Jurik, T. W., Chabot, J. F., Ohabot, B. F.: Ontogeny of photosynthetic performance inFragaria virginiana under changing light regimes. -Plant Physiol.63: 542–547, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kubín, Š., Hládek, L.: An integrating recorder for photosynthetioally active radiant energy with improved resolution. -Plant Cell Physiol.4: 153–168, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. Littleton, E. J., Dennett, M. D., Elston, J., Monteith, J. L.: The growth and development of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) under tropical field conditions. 1. Leaf area. -J. agr. Sci.93: 291–307, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. Milford, G. F. J., Lenton, J. R.: Effect of photoperiod on growth of sugar beet. -Ann. Bot.40: 1309–1315, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. Patterson, T. G., Moss, D. N.: Senescence in field-grown wheat. -Crop Sci.19: 635–640, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. Rawson, H. M., Hackett, C.: An exploration of the carbon economy of the tobacco plant. III. Gas exchange of leaves in relation to position on the stem, ontogeny and nitrogen content. - Aust. J. Plant Physiol.1: 551–560, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Robson, M. J.: A comparison of British and North African varieties of tall fescue, (Festuca arundinacea). I. Leaf growth during winter and the effects on it of temperature and day length. - J. appl. Ecol.4: 475–484, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Robson, M. J.: The growth and development of simulated swards of perennial ryegrass I. Leaf growth and dry weight change as related to the ceiling yield of a seedling sward. -Ann. Bot.37: 487–500, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Šetlík, I., Šesták, Z.: Use of leaf tissue samples in ventilated chambers for long term measurements of photosynthesis. -In:Šesták, Z., Čatský, J., Jarvis, P. G. (ed.): Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. Pp. 316–342. Dr. W. Junk N. V. -Publ., The Hague 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, T. H., Cooper, J. P., Treharne, K. J.: Growth response of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) to different light and temperature environments. I. Leaf development and senescence. -Crop Sci.8: 437–440, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Terry, N., Ulrich, A.: Effects of phosphorus deficiency on the photosynthesis and respiration of leaves of sugar beet. -Plant Physiol.51: 43–47, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Trbharne, K. J., Cooper, J. P., Taylor, T. H.: Growth response of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) to different light and temperature environments. H. Leaf age and photo,- synthetio activity. -Crop Sci.8: 441–445, 1968.Google Scholar
  22. Vietor, D. M., Ariyanayagam, R. P., Mttsgrave, R.B.: Photosynthetic selection ofZea mays L. I. Plant age and leaf position effeots and a relationship between leaf and canopy rates. - - Crop Sci.17: 567–573, 1977.Google Scholar
  23. Vos de, N. M.: Cultivar differences in plant and crop photosynthesis.-In: Crop Physiology and Cereal Breeding. Proc. Eucarpia Workshop, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 14–16 November 1978. Pp. 71–74. Wageningen 1979.Google Scholar
  24. Wada, Y.: Changes of photosynthetic and respiratory activities and of chlorophyll content in growing leaves of some tobacco varieties. -Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)81: 25–32, 1968.Google Scholar
  25. Wilhelm, W. W., Nelson, C. J.: Leaf growth, leaf aging, and photosynthetic rate of tall fescue genotypes. -Crop Sci.18: 769–772, 1978.Google Scholar
  26. Woledge, J., Leafe, E. L.: Single leaf and canopy photosynthesis in a ryegrass sward. -Ann. Bot.40: 773–783, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academia 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danuše Hodáňová
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Experimental BotanyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPraha 6Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations