Skip to main content
Log in

Utility and self-sufficiency in the selection of educational alternatives

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

Abstract

Methods of deciding among educational programs usually have taken too narrow a focus or have been unsystematic. A set of guidelines for selecting among alternative programs would be helpful to the decision-maker who must design new programs, continue existing ones, or modify and synthesize the old and the new. This paper provides a possible set of decision rules for identifying and choosing among educational programs based on the underlying requirement that each learner reach at least self-sufficiency. It proposes a two-level decision model that is intended to accommodate people in society who are self-sufficient or who are “on target” for reaching that state and those in society who are neither self-sufficient nor moving toward that state. Both a rational and mathematical model are presented; both require empirical validation and continued thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, K. Melcher, T., & Nickens, J. A computerized system for benefit-cost analysis in vocational education. Final report, Project No. DVE 9-1C11. Gainesville, Fla.: Institute for Educational Finance, College of Education, University of Florida, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., & Quandt, R. E.Microeconomics theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. A.Educational system planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. A.Identifying and solving problems: A system approach. (2nd ed.) La Jolla, Calif.: University Associates Publishers, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. A., & English, F. W.Needs assessment: Concept and application. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Educational Technology Publication, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R. A., & Thomas, S.Evaluation without fear. New York: New Dimensions, Franklin Watts, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, W.Microeconomic Theory. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press, Indiana, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman, J. A. (Ed.)Setting national priorities: Agenda for the 80’s. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, J. W.Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, I. Human capital revolution in economics development: Current status, expectations and realities,Comparative Education Review, 25th Anniversary Issue. November, 1978.

  • Witkin, B. R. “Needs assessment kits, models and tools”,Educational Technology, 8(11), November, 1977.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Authors’ Note. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Florida State Department of Education, Division of Vocational Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, R., Carron, A.S. Utility and self-sufficiency in the selection of educational alternatives. Journal of Instructional Development 4, 17–18 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908818

Keywords

Navigation