Advertisement

Journal of instructional development

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 33–37 | Cite as

A management framework for program development techniques

Symposium on ID models—4
  • Castelle G. Gentry
Articles Symposium On ID Models: Introduction
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Believing that most ID system approach models merely describewhat should be done, but recognizing that ID techniques do provide operational directions for accomplishing tasks implied by those models, the author describes an ID approach model for organizing ID techniques. He categorizes a sampling of techniques according to the defined functions of the model, then identifies the techniques by name, purpose, and literature references.

Keywords

Instructional Development Document Reproduction Fault Tree Analysis Instructional Developer Educational Tech 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. B. Dick.Creative use of invisible printing. (A. B. Dick, 5700 W. Touhy Ave., Chicago, 60648) 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Ahauja, H. N.Constructor performance control by network. New York: John Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, D. W., & Pyan, K. A.Microteaching. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F.Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. DeCecco, J.The psychology of learning and instruction: Educational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H.Group techniques for program planning. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Dessler, G.Management fundamentals: A framework. Reston, Va.: Reston Publishing, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. Doohes, M. J., & Marquis, V.Rating employee and supervising performance. New York: American Management Association, 1950.Google Scholar
  9. Duperrin, J. C., & Godet, M. SMIC 74: A method for constructing and ranking scenarios.Futures, 1975, 7(4), 30–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellul, J.The technological society. New York: Vintage Books, 1967.Google Scholar
  11. Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R., & Russel, H. M.Communicating and organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. Fisch, A. L. The trigger film techniques.Improving College and University Teaching, 1970, 20(4), 286–289.Google Scholar
  13. Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., & Morris, L. L.How to design a program evaluation. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. Gagne, R. M.Task analysis—Its relationship to context analysis. Paper presented at AERA, Chicago, April 1974. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 092 588).Google Scholar
  15. Gentry, C.Criteria for rejecting clients. Unpublished paper, January 1979.Google Scholar
  16. Gentry, C. G.Outline for sequencing and clustering of objectives. Unpublished paper used in ID classes, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. Goldman, R. M. Uses for the conference telephone in classroom instruction.Educational Technology, 1978,18, 42–43.Google Scholar
  18. Goldman, T. A.Cost-effectiveness. New York: Praeger, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. Greenblat, C. S., & Duke, R.Gaming—Simulation: Rationale, design and application. New York: Halsted Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  20. Gunn, J., & Guy, C. Easy ways to help children think about the future.The Futurist, 1974,8(4), 186–188.Google Scholar
  21. Haddock, T. Individualized instruction through student contracts.Arizona Teacher, 1967,55, 10–11.Google Scholar
  22. Helmer, O.The use of the Delphi technique in problems of educational innovation. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1966.Google Scholar
  23. Holmes, T. F., & Gentry, C. G. A foolproof personal filing system.Audiovisual Instruction, 1979,24(5), 40–42.Google Scholar
  24. Horn, R. E.How to write information mapping. Lexington, Mass.: Information Resources, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. Hussain, K. M.Development of information systems for education. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, J. C.Design methods: Seeds of human future. London: Wiley Interscience, 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Judson, A. J.A manager’s guide to making changes. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  28. Kaufman, R. A.Educational system planning. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  29. Kemp, J. E.Planning and producing audiovisual materials. San Francisco: Chandler, 1963.Google Scholar
  30. Klaus, D. J.Patterns of peer tutoring: Final report. Washington, D. C.: American Institute for Research in Behavioral Sciences, 1975. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 117 695)Google Scholar
  31. Klausmeirer, H. Research and development toward the improvement of education.Journal of Experimental Education, 37(1), 1968, 1–163.Google Scholar
  32. Koontz, H., & O’Donnel, C.Management: A book of readings. New York: McGraw Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
  33. Magaro, J. D. PPBS: A means towards accountability.Audiovisual Instruction, 1975,20(10), 10–12.Google Scholar
  34. Mundal, M. E.Motion and time study: Principles and practices. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1960.Google Scholar
  35. Osborn, A. F.Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York: Scribner’s, 1963.Google Scholar
  36. Pfeiffer, W. J., & Jones, J. E.A handbook of structured experiences for human relations training (Vol. 1). Iowa City: University Associated Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  37. Pool, I. de Sola.Trends in content analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  38. Posner, G. J., & Strike, K. A. A categorization scheme for principles of sequencing content.Review of Educational Research, 1976,46(9), 665–689.Google Scholar
  39. Priluch, H. M., & Hourihan, P. M.Practical CPM for construction. Duxbury, Mass.: Means Company, 1968.Google Scholar
  40. Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. L.Field research. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  41. Schriber, T. J.Fundamentals of flowcharting. New York: John Wiley, 1969.Google Scholar
  42. Shaplin, J. T., & Olds, H. F.Team Teaching. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.Google Scholar
  43. Stake, R. E.Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus: Charles Merrill, 1975.Google Scholar
  44. Stolovitch, H. D. The intermediate technology of learner verification and revision.Educational Technology, 1978,28(2), 13–17.Google Scholar
  45. Taba, H. Learning by discovery.Elementary School Journal, 1963,63(6), 308–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Witkin, B. R. Needs assessment kits, models and tools.Educational Technology, 1977,17(11), 5–18.Google Scholar
  47. Witkin, B. R., & Stephens, K. G. Faulttree analysis: A research tool for educational planning.Technical Report 1. Hayward, Calif.: Alameda County PACE Center, October 1968. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 029 379)Google Scholar
  48. Wittson, C. L., & Benschoter, R. Two-way television: Helping the medical center reach out.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1972,129(5), 624–677.Google Scholar
  49. Yates, J. R., & Henchey, S. P.Futurism in education. New York: Macmillan, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Castelle G. Gentry
    • 1
  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityEast Lansing

Personalised recommendations