Advertisement

Evaluation of a new filter for membrane plasma separation

Preliminary observations
  • Mauro Valbonesi
  • Sebastiano Garelli
  • Franco Montani
  • Laura Mosconi
Original Contributions
  • 31 Downloads

Summary

A new plasma filter for membrane plasma separation was used in 10 patients with the following diagnoses: relapsing Guillain-Barré syndrome (one patient), multiple sclerosis (one patient), myasthenia gravis (two patients), cryoglobulinemia (two patients), rheumatoid arthritis (one patient) and psoriasis (three patients). In all patients but one the plasma flow was from 975 to 1,370 ml/h; extremely high levels of cryoglobulins were the cause of filter plugging during a single procedure. The composition of the effluent plasma was not significantly different from the patients’ plasma as regards protein electrophoresis and the levels of immune complexes, immunoglobulins and complement. No platelet activation or blood clotting within the processed blood was observed during 20 procedures. No elevation of lysozyme levels or changes in the osmotic fragility of the red blood cells were found, confirming the excellent biocompatibility of these new filters. The clinical results were consistent with the volumes of plasma exchanged and the clinical diagnoses.

Key-words

Membrane plasma separation Plasma-exchange Plasma filtration Plasmapheresis 

References

  1. 1.
    Farrel P. C., Schindhelm K., Roberts C.G.: Membrane plasma separation. In:Sieberth H. G. (Ed.). Plasma exchange. F. K. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart-New York, 1980; p. 37.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fassbinder W., Pletzer E., Ernst W., Baldamus C. A., Koch K. M.: Immune complex elimination by plasma separation with membrane filtration. In:Sieberth H. G. (Ed.), Plasma exchange. F. K. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart-New York, 1980; p. 107.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garelli S., Valbonesi M., Codarri M., Camerone G.: Tasso sierico ed urinario del lisozima in malati ematologicit significato diagnostico e prognostico—G. ital. Chim. clin.5, 287, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manca F., Migliorini P., Bombardieri S., Celada F.: An enzymatically active antigen-antibody probe to measure circulating immune complexes by competition. Use of theEscherichia coli β-galactosidase in the probe and of bovine conglutinin as the complement-binding reagent—Clin. Immunol. Immunopath.16, 131, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McLeod B. C., Viernes A., Sassetti R.: Complement activation by plasma separator membranes—Transfusion (Philad.)23, 143, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ritchie R. F.: Theory and practice of automated nephelometry. In:Peeters H. H. (Ed.): Protides of the biological fluids. Pergamon Press, Oxford. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sieberth H. G., Glockner W. M., Hirsh H. H., Borberg H., Mahieu P.: Plasma separation in man—Artific. Organs3, 44, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valbonesi M., Garelli S., Montani F., Cefis M., Florio G.: A simple and rapid test for osmotic fragility of red blood cells—Acta haemat. (Basel)69, 106, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valbonesi M., Garelli S., Mosconi L., Zerbi D., Celano I.: Plasma exchange as a therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome with immune complexes—Vox Sang. (Basel)38, 181, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu K. K., Hoak J. C.: A new method for the quantitative detection of platelet aggregates in patients with arterial insufficiency—Lancetii, 924, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauro Valbonesi
    • 1
  • Sebastiano Garelli
    • 1
  • Franco Montani
    • 1
  • Laura Mosconi
    • 1
  1. 1.Servizio di ImmuncematologiaOspedale di SaronnoSaronno (VA)Italia

Personalised recommendations