Advertisement

The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 539–547 | Cite as

Cytomorphology of some uncommon tumors of childhood and adolescence

  • U. R. Singh
  • K. Gupta
  • V. K. Arora
  • S. Gupta
  • A. Bhatia
Original Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

With the advent of newer adjuvant chemotheraputic regimes resulting in dramatic improvement in survival, it is mandatory to obtain quick correct diagnosis, which is provided by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Cytology of childhood tumors was studied to find any distinguishing features, which would help in arriving at a diagnosis.

Cytomorphology of 386 childhood and adolescent (0–19 years) tumors diagnosed between 1984 and 1993 were studied. Lipoma was the commonest benign tumor in 0–14 years age group. Fibroadenoma of the breast was the common benign tumor in adolescent (10–19 yrs) girls and pleomorphic adenoma in adolescent (15–19 yrs) boys. Wilms' tumor was the most frequent solid malignant tumor in preschool children and Hodgkin lymphoma, mixed cellularity in the school going age (5–19 yrs). Malignant tumors were more frequent (199).

In addition, some rare malignancies like hepatoblastoma, meningioma, ganglioneuroblastoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, clear cell sarcoma kidney and malignant histiocytosis were diagnosed. The cytological features and the differential diagnoses are discussed. It is possible to diagnose these uncommon tumors if particular attention is paid to the distinguishing cytomorphological features in correlation with clinicoradiological findings and cytochemistry.

Key words

FNAC Childhood Tumors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bennigton JL. In: Finegold M, ed.Pathology of Neoplasia in Children and Adolescents. Philadeiphia: W B Saunders Company, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Triche TJ. Tumor Pathology In: Plowman PN, Pinkerton CR ed.Pediatric Oncology. Clinical Practice and Controversies, London: Chapman and Hall Medical, 1992: 51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dehner LP. Soft tissue sarcomas of childhood. The differential diagnostic dilemma of small blue cellsNatl Cancer Inst Monog 1981; 56: 43–59.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhatia A, Mehrotra P. Fine needle aspiration cytology in a case of hepatoblastoma.Acta Cytol 1986; 30: 439–441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stiller CA. Aetiology and epidemiology In: Plowman PN, Pinkerton CR, ed.Paediatric Oncology. Clinical Practice and Controversies. London: Chapman and Hall Medical, 1992: 5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rajwanshi A, Rao KLN, Marwaha RK, Nijhawan VS, Gupta SK. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in childhood malignancies.Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5: 378–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cagle PT, Hough AJ, Pysher Jet al. Comparison of adrenal cortical tumors in children and adults.Cancer 1986; 57: 2237–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katz RL, Patel, S, Mackey B, Zarnoza J. FNAC of the adrenal gland.Acta Cytologica 1984; 28: 269–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weinberg AC, Fingold MJ. Primary hepatic tumors in childhood. In: Finegold M, ed.Pathology of Neoplasia in Children and Adolescents, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1986: 333–334.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haas JE, Muczynski KA, Krailo M, Ablin AL, Ablin V Hammond DN. Histopathology and Prognosis in childhood hepatoblastoma and hepatocarcinoma.Cancer 1989; 64: 1082–1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adam A, Hochholzer L. Gangiloneuroblastoma of the posterior mediastinum.Cancer 1981; 47: 373–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kilton LJ, Aschenbrener C, Burns CP. Ganglioneuroblastoma in adults.Cancer 1976; 37: 974–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar VP. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of ganglioneuroblastoma.Acta Cytol 1987; 31: 583–586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Otal Salaverri C, Ganzalez CR. Hevia-Vazquez A, Lerma-Peurtas E, Galera DH. Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroblastoma. Report of a case diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology and electron micro.Acta Cytol 1989; 33: 80–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palombini L, Vetran A. Cytodiagnosis of ganglioneuroblastoma.Acta Cytol 1976; 20: 286–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosai J.Ackerman's Surgical Pathology 7th ed St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1989: 804.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akhtar M, Ashraf AM, Sackey K, Burgess A. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney.Diagn Cytopathol 1989; 5: 181–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drut R, Pomar M. Cytologic characteristics of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney in fine needle aspiration biopsy.Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7: 611–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beckwith JB. Wilms tumor and other renal tumors of childhood. In: Finegold M ed.Pathology of Neoplasia in children and Adolescents, Philadelphia; WB Saunders Co. 1986: 318–326.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beckwith JB. Palmer NF. Histopathology and prognosis of Wilms' tumor. Results from first national Wilms' tumor study.Cancer 1978; 48: 1937–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mardsen HB, Lawler W, Kumar PM. Bone metastasizing renal tumors of childhood.Cancer 1978; 42: 1922–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rappaport H. Tumors of haematopoletic systems. In:Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Washington DC: AFIP fasc, 1966: 8.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malone M. The histiocytosis of childhood.Histopathology 1991; 19: 105–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bucsky P, Favara B, Feller ACet al. Malignant histiocytosis and large cell anaplastic (Ki-1) lymphoma in childhood: Guldelines for differential diagnosis. Report of the histiocyte society.Med Pediatr Oncol. 1994; 22: 200–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barbey S, Gogusev J, Mouly Het al. DEL cell line: a malignant histiocytosis CD 30+t (5,6) (q35, p21) cell line.,Int J Cancer 1990; 45: 546–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gutierrez-Reve Pecero VM, Luque M, Arquez R, Ayerza lerchundi MA, Fernandez Jurado A. Phenytoin-induced hemocytophagic histiocytosis indistinguishable from mailgnant histiocytosis.South Med J 1991; 84: 649–650.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. R. Singh
    • 1
  • K. Gupta
    • 1
  • V. K. Arora
    • 1
  • S. Gupta
    • 1
  • A. Bhatia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathologyUniversity College of Medical Sciences and GTB HospitalDelhi

Personalised recommendations