Abstract
The need to contain the rising costs associated with the production of goods and services has posed challenges for instructional design professionals. This problem is particularly acute within the U.S. Navy’s training commands. The outcome of this challenge has been Navy-sponsored research and development in computeraided instructional design. This article describes some of these efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boucher, B. G., & Goldman, R. J. (1986). An “expert system” approach to developing training and publications data.Proceedings of the Society of Logistics Engineers Twenty-First Annual Symposium.
Briggs, L. J. (Ed.). (1976).Instructional design: Principles and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Cantor, J. (1985). The Strategic Weapon System Training Program.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 14(3), 22–26.
Cantor, J. (1987). A systems approach to instructional development in technical education.Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 9(2), 155–166.
Kearsley, G. (1986). Automated instructional development using personal computers: Research issues.Journal of Instructional Development, 9(1), 9–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cantor, J.A. An automated curriculum development process for navy technical training. Journal of Instructional Development 11, 3–11 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905299
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905299