Skip to main content
Log in

Continuum shell model calculations and the resonances below the GDR in12C

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

The excitation functions in the11B(p, n0),11B(p, p1) and11B(p, γ) reaction channels predicted by a continuum shell model calculation are compared to facilitate isospin assignments forJ− resonances in the (19÷22) MeV region of excitation in12C. Model predictions are also tested against differential cross-section data in the particle channels. It is shown that definitive spin, isospin and parity assignments can be made for several dominant resonances reported in the literature. Comparison with recent (e, e′) data analysis not only confirms our model predictions but also demonstrates that level energies are well reproduced within the multiconfiguration shell model only if continuum effects are included.

Riassunto

Si confrontano le funzioni di eceitazione nei canali di reazione11B(p, n0),11B(p, p1) e11B(p, γ) previste da un calcolo del modello a strati nel continuo per facilitare l'assegnazione di isospin per le risonanzeJ− nella regione da 19 a 22 MeV di eccitazione in12C. Si verificano anche le previsioni del modello rispetto ai dati delle sezioni d'urto differenziali nei canali delle particelle. Si mostra che si possono fare assegnazioni definitive di spin, isospin e parità per parecchie risonanze dominanti riportate nella letteratura. Il confronto con l'analisi di dati recenti (e, e′) non solo confronta le nostre previsioni del modello ma dimostra che le energie dei livelli sono riprodotte abbastanza bene nell'ambito del modello a strati a molte configurazioni solo se si includono effetti nel continuo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Ramavataram, K. Ramavataram andG. Do Dang:Prog. Theor. Phys.,65, 1928 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Ramavataram, R. Larue, V. Turcotte, C. St. Pierre andS. Ramavataram:Nuovo Cimento A,58, 342 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Ramavataram:J. Phys. G,8, 949 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ramavataram:Z. Phys. A,310, 87 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Ajzenberg-Selove andC. L. Busch:Nucl. Phys. A,336, 1 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Kurath:Phys. Rev.,101, 216 (1956);106, 975 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hague andS. Maripu:Phys. Rev. C,8, 1609 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Buck andA. D. Hill:Nucl. Phys. A,95, 271 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. White, R. O. Lane, H. D. Knox andJ. M. Cox:Nucl. Phys. A,340, 13 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. P. E. Koehler, H. D. Knox, D. A. Rester, R. O. Lane andD. J. Millener:Nucl. Phys. A,394, 221 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. H. Neuschafer, M. M. Stephens, S. L. Tabor andK. W. Kemper:Phys. Rev. C,28, 1594 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. W. Jones, C. Glashausser, S. Nanda, R. de Swiniarski, T. A. Carey, W. Cornelius, J. M. Moss, J. B. McClelland, S. J. Seestrom-Morris, J. R. Comfort, J.-L. Escudie, M. Gazzaly, N. Hintz, G. Igo, M. Haji-Saeid andC. A. Whitten:Phys. Lett. B,128, 281 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. R. Comfort, G. L. Moake, C. C. Foster, P. Schwandt andW. G. Love:Phys. Rev. C,26, 1800 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Borchers, H. De Jong, J. Krug andE. Kuhlmann:Nucl. Phys. A,405, 141 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Anghinolfi, P. Corvisiero, G. Ricco, M. Taiuti andA. Zucchiatti:Nucl. Phys. A,339, 66 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. S. Hanna, W. Feldman, M. Suffert andD. Kurath:Phys. Rev. C,25, 1179 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Torizuka, A. Yamayuchi, T. Teresawa, Y. Kojima, K. Nakahara, M. Oyamada, K. Itoh, A. Nakada, S. Mitunobu andM. Kimura:Phys. Rev. Lett.,25, 874 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. F. C. Baker:Aust. J. Phys.,36, 649 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Overley andR. R. Borchers:Nucl. Phys.,65, 156 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Salzborn andG. Claustritzer:Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions, edited byH. H. Barschall andW. Haeberli (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wis., 1971), p. 703.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. S. Hicks, J. B. Flanz, R. A. Lindgren, G. A. Peterson, L. W. Fagg andD. J. Millener:Phys. Rev. C,30, 1 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

To speed up publication, the author of this paper has agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.

Traduzione a cura della Redazione.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramavataram, S. Continuum shell model calculations and the resonances below the GDR in12C. Nuov Cim A 85, 280–291 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02902454

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02902454

PACS. 25.10.

Navigation