American Potato Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 8, pp 291–299 | Cite as

Comparative effectiveness of certain knife disinfectants and the use of the double-edged knife for the control of ring rot of potatoes

  • W. A. Kreutzer
  • Geo H. Lane
  • J. L. Paschal


Tests using presumably ring-rot-free Red McClure seed potatoes in the San Luis Valley of Colorado in 1945 showed that boiling water and mercuric chloride solution (0.2 per cent) gave complete control of ring rot when used as rotary knife disinfectants. Solutions of Roccal (a mixture of alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chlorides) in concentrations of 2, 1, and 0.5 per cent and Hyamine 1622 25 per cent (di-isobutyl phenoxy ethoxy ethyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride) in concentrations of 0.2, 0.1, and 0.05 per cent failed to give adequate control of ring rot when used as rotary knife disinfectants. Cresol (Phenol coeff. 5) in 2-per cent solution, although giving control, affected stand adversely. The stand was also markedly reduced following the use of a 1-per cent Cresol solution which, in addition, failed to give complete control of ring rot. Both 1-and 2-per cent Cresol solutions, when used without knife contamination, also resulted in highly significant stand reductions.

A newly designed stationary and automatically disinfected cutting knife gave control of ring rot which compared favorably with that obtained by the use of the power-driven rotary knife when both knives were disinfected with 0.2-per cent mercuric chloride solution.

When mercuric chloride solution (0.2 per cent) was used as a cutting-knife disinfectant, only a relatively small amount of infection was obtained by exposing the cut surfaces of seed pieces to contaminated platform boards at the base of the knife.


Seed Piece Mercuric Chloride Hyamine Mercuric Chloride Solution Corynebacterium Sepedonicum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    Glick, D.P. 1943. The deterioration of disinfectants in agricultural use. Abstract in Jour. Bact. 45:42–43.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    —, P. A. Ark., and H. N. Racicot. 1944. Outline of procedure for diagnosis of bacterial ring rot of potatoes. — Report of the Committee of the Potato Association of America. Amer. Potato Jour. 21:311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henderson, W. J. 1944. The Colorado rotary potato cutter. Colo. State Coll. Ext. Service Bull. 381A.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knorr, L. Carl. 1945. Reliability of the stem-ooze test for field identification of potato ring rot. Amer. Potato Jour. 22:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kreutzer, William A., Dudley P. Glick, and John G. McLean. 1941. Bacterial ring rot of potato. Colo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Press Bull. 94:1–12.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    —, and John G. McLean. 1943. Location and movement of the causal agent of ring rot in the potato plant. Colo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 30:1–28.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    —, W. J. Henderson, and George H. Lane. 1945. The comparative effectiveness of certain cutting knife treatments in the control of ring rot of potatoes. Amer. Potato Jour. 22:127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leonard, Warren H., and Andrew G. Clark. 1939. Field plot technique. 271 pp. Burgess Pub. Co., Minneapolis, MinaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paschal, J. L., Geo. H. Lane, and W. A. Kreutzer. 1946. The double-edged stationary potato cutting knife. Colo. Exp. Sta. Bull. 493. (In press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Starr, G. H. 1944. Hot water for the control of potato ring rot bacteria on the cutting knife. Amer. Potato Jour. 21:161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1946

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. A. Kreutzer
    • 1
  • Geo H. Lane
    • 1
  • J. L. Paschal
    • 1
  1. 1.Colorado Agricultural Experiment StationFort Collins

Personalised recommendations