Advertisement

Socioeconomic status and cancer screening in Japanese males: Large inequlaity in middle-aged and urban residents

  • Yoshiharu Fukuda
  • Keiko Nakamura
  • Takehito Takano
  • Hiroyuki Nakao
  • Hirohisa Imai
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Cancer screening has become common in Japan. However, little is known about the socioeconomic factors affecting cancer screening participation. This study was performed to examine the association between socioeconomic status and cancer screening participation in Japanese males.

Methods

Using the data of 23,394 males sampled from across Japan, the associations between self-reported participation in screenings for three types of cancer (i.e., stomach, lung and colon) and socioeconomic variables, including marital status, types of residential area (metropolitan/nonmetropolitan), household income, and employment status, were examined using multilevel logistic regression by age group (40 to 64 and ≥65 years).

Results

The cancer screening participation rates were 34.5% (stomach), 21.3% (lung), and 24.8% (colon) for the total population studied. Being married, living in a nonmetropolitan area, having a higher income and being employed in a large-scale company showed independent associations with a higher rate of cancer screening participation for all three types of cancer. Income-related differences in cancer screening were more pronounced in the middle-aged population than in the elderly population, and in metropolitan areas than in nonmetropolitan areas.

Conclusions

There are notable socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation in Japan. To promote cancer screening, socioeconomic factors should be considered, particularly for middle-aged and urban residents.

Key words

cancer screening health inequality socioeconomic factor urban health 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Acheson D. Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health. London: Stationary Office; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Kogenvinas M, Pearce N, Susser M, Boffetta P. Social Inequalities and Cancer. Oxford: IARC; 1997.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Davey Smith G. Health Inequalities. Bristol: Policy Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C, Zapka J, Sofaer S, Pettinger M, et al. The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women’s Health Initiative. Prev Med. 2003; 31: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Wu ZH, Black SA, Markides KS. Prevalence and associated factors of cancer screening: why are so many older Mexican American women never screened? Prev Med. 2003; 33: 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Klassen AC, Smith ALM, Meissner HI, Zabora J, Curbow B, Mandelblatt J. If we gave away mammograms, who would get them? A neighborhood evaluation of a no-cost breast cancer screening programme. Prev Med. 2002; 34: 13–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Banks E, Beral V, Cameron R, Hogg A, Langley N, Barnes I, et al. Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening. Breast Can Res. 2002; 4: R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Lorant V, Boland B, Humblet P, Deliege D. Equity in prevention and health care. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56: 510–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Baker D, Middleton E. Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57: 417–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Suarez L, Ramirez AG, Villarreal R, Marti J, McAlister A, Talavera GA, et al. Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic groups. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 19: 47–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Hisamichi S. Community screening programmes of cancer and cardiovascular diseases in Japan. J Epidemiol. 1996; 6: S159-S163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Yamaguchi K. Overview of cancer control programmes in Japan. Jpn J Oncol. 2002; 32: S22-S31. (Article in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Report of Community and Elderly Health. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2003. (Article in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Yoshimura T. Occupational health. J Epidemiol. 1996; 6: S115-S120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Hamashima C, Yoshida K. What is important for the introduction of cancer screening in the workplace? Asia Pac J Can Prev. 2003; 4: 39–43.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2001 Comprehensive Survey of the Living Conditions of People on Health and Welfare. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2003. (Article in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Mejer L, Siermann C. Income Poverty in the European Union: Children, Gender and Poverty Gaps. Luxembourg: Eurostat; 2000.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Hirata M, Kumagai S, Tabuchi T, Tainaka H, Ando T, Orita H. Actual conditions of occupational health activities in small-scale enterprises in Japan: system for occupational health, health management and demands by small-scale enterprises. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1999; 41: 190–201. (Article in Japanese)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Okubo T. The present state of occupational health in Japan. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997; 70: 148–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Leyland AH, Goldstein H. Multilevel Modelling of Health Statistics. West Sussex: Wiley; 2001.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Siahpush M, Singh GK. Sociodemographic predictors of pap test receipt, currency and knowledge among Australian women. Prev Med. 2002; 35: 362–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Chamot E, Perneger TV. Men’s and women’s knowledge and perceptions of breast cancer and mammography screening. Prev Med. 1999; 34: 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Nijis HGT, Essink-Bot ML, DeKoning HJ, Kirkels WJ, Schroder FH. Why do men refuse or attend population-based screening for prostate cancer? J Public Health Med. 2000; 22: 312–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Tanaka T, Tsushima S, Morio S, Okamoto N, Sato T, Kakigawa Y, et al. Analysis of cancer screening participation in regional inhabitants. Kosei no Shihyo. 1990; 37: 21–28. (Article in Japanese)Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Morio S, Okamoto N, Tanaka T, Tsushima S, Sato T, Takigawa Y, et al. Participation of regional inhabitants in cancer screening. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1990; 37: 559–568. (Article in Japanese)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Hirano Y, Ojima T. Analysis of factors influencing participation in the cervical cancer screening programme in the community in Japan. J Epidemiol. 1997; 7: 125–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Survey on Demands of Health and Welfare Services. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2000. (Article in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979. 32: 51–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Delgado-Rodriguez M, Llorca J. Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58: 635–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Tsubono Y, Fukao A, Hisamichi S, Hosokawa T, Sugawara N. Accuracy of self-report for stomach cancer screening. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47: 977–981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Caplan LS, Mandelson MT, Anderson LA. Health Maintenance Organization: Validity of self-reported mammography: examining recall and covariates among older women in a Health Maintenance Organization. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 57: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Armstrong K, Long JA, Shea JA. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women. Prev Med. 2004; 38: 754–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Watanabe Y, Morita M. Screening for gastric and colorectal cancer in Japan. Journal of Kyoko Prefectural University of Medicine. 2003; 112: 371–378. (Article in Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. (34).
    Ozasa K. Lung cancer screening, today. Journal of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. 2003; 112: 395–402. (Article in Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. (35).
    Nakaya N, Ohmori K, Suzuki Y, Hozawa A, Kuriyama S, Tsubono Y, et al. A survey regarding the implementation of cancer screening among municipalities in Japan. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2004; 51: 530–539. (Article in Japanese)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60: 7–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Kunst A, Mackenbach J. Measuring socioeconomic inequalities in health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1997.Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Ohtake F. Inequalities in Japan. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha; 2005. (Article in Japanese)Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Diez-Roux AV. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000; 21: 171–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Subramanian SV, Jone K, Duncan C. Multilevel Methods for Public Health Research. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF editors. Neighborhoods and Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 65–111.Google Scholar
  41. (41).
    Fukuda Y, Nakamura K, Takano T. Increased excess deaths in urban areas: quantification of geographical variation in mortality in Japan, 1973 to 1998. Health Policy. 2004; 68: 233–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Fukuda Y, Nakamura K, Takano T. Cause-specific mortality differences across socioeconomic position of municipalities in Japan, 1973–77 and 1993–98: increased importance of injury and suicide in inequality for ages under 75. Int J Epidemiol. 2005; 34: 100–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Fukuda Y, Nakamura K, Takano T. Accumulation of health risk behaviors is associated with lower socioeconomic status and women’s urban residence: a multilevel analysis in Japan. BMC Public Health. 2005; 5: 53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Christenfeld N, Glynn LM, Phillips DP, Shrira I. Exposure to New York City as a risk factor for heart attack mortality. Psychosom Med. 1999; 61: 740–743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Latha E, Monaharan M, Vijay VI. Impacts of urbanization on the lifestyle and on the prevalence of diabetes in native Asian Indian population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999; 44: S207-S213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Hygiene 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshiharu Fukuda
    • 1
  • Keiko Nakamura
    • 1
  • Takehito Takano
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Nakao
    • 2
  • Hirohisa Imai
    • 2
  1. 1.Health Promotion/International Health, Division of Public HealthGraduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyNational Institute of Public HealthWako, SaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations