Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, 18:229 | Cite as

Epinephrine and cortisol responses to work: A test of the models of Frankenhaeuser and Karasek

  • Tessa M. Pollard
  • Giles Ungpakorn
  • Geoffrey Ainsworth Harrison
  • Katharine R. Parkes
  • T. M. Pollard
Empirical Research


Both Frankenhaeuser and Karasek have put forward models describing how job demand and control influence epinephrine and cortisol levels. These models were tested in a sample of 53 women and 51 men in a variety of occupations. They were studied over one rest day and two working days. Subjects reported their perceived demand and control and their mood on each day, as well as providing urine for assessment of urinary excretion rates of epinephrine and cortisol. In men, but not women, epinephrine levels were higher on the working days than on the rest day, and demand was found to covary positively with epinephrine, supporting Frankenhaeuser's model with respect to epinephrine variation in men. However, cortisol levels were not elevated on working days compared to the rest day, and no relationship between job control and cortisol was seen which is in contradiction of Frankenhaeuser's model with respect to cortisol variation. There was some suggestion that demand was most strongly associated with elevated epinephrine in men when job control was low in accordance with Karasek's model, but there was no evidence for such an effect with respect to cortisol.


Cortisol Cortisol Level Excretion Rate Behavioral Medicine Urine Flow Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. (1).
    House J, McMichael A, Wells J, Kaplan B, Landerman L: Occupational stress and health among factory workers.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1979,20:139–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Johnson J, Hall E: Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population.American Journal of Public Health. 1988,78:1336–1342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Pieper C, LaCroix A, Karasek RA: The relation of psychosocial dimensions of work with coronary heart disease risk factors: A meta-analysis of five United States data bases.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1989,129:483–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Sauter S, Hurrell J, Cooper C (eds):Job Control and Worker Health. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Karasek RA, Theorell T:Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Frankenhaeuser M, Lundberg U, Fredrikson M, et al: Stress on and off the job as related to sex and occupational status in white-collar workers.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1989,10: 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Krantz DS, Contrada RJ, Hill DR, Friedler E: Environmental stress and biobehavioral antecedents of coronary heart disease.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988,56:333–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Frankenhaeuser M, Lundberg U, Forsman L: Dissociation between sympathetic-adrenal and pituitary-adrenal responses to an achievement situation characterized by high controllability: Comparison between Type A and Type B males and females.Biological Psychology. 1980,10:79–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Lundberg U: Catecholamine and cortisol excretion under psychologically different laboratory conditions. In Usdin E, Kvetnansky R, Kopin I (eds),Catecholamines and Stress: Recent Advances. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 1980, 455–476.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Lundberg U, Frankenhaeuser M: Pituitary-adrenal and sympathetic-adrenal correlates of distress and effort.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1980,24:125–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Frankenhaeuser M: A biopsychosocial approach to work life issues.International Journal of Health Services. 1989,19:747–758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Frankenhaeuser M: The psychophysiology of workload, stress, and health: Comparison between the sexes.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1991,13:197–204.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Frankenhaeuser M, Rauste von Wright M, Collins A, et al: Sex differences in psychoneuroendocrine reactions to examination stress.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1978,40:334–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Stoney CM, Davis M, Matthews KA: Sex differences in physiological responses to stress and in coronary heart disease.Psychophysiology. 1987,4:127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Karasek RA: Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979,24:285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Landsbergis PA: Occupational stress among health care workers: A test of the job demands-control model.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1988,9:217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Perrewe P, Ganster D: The impact of job demands and behavioral control on experienced job stress.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1989,10:213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Kushnir T, Melamed S: Workload, perceived vontrol, and psychological distress in Type A/B industrial workers.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1991,12:155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Karasek RA: Control in the workplace and its health-related impacts. In Sauter S, Hurrell J, Cooper C (eds),Job Control and Worker Health. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1989, 129–159.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Karasek RA, Baker D, Marxer F, Ahlbom A, Theorell T: Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men.American Journal of Public Health. 1981,71:694–705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Karasek RA, Theorell T, Schwartz J, et al: Job characteristics in relation to the prevalence of myocardial infarction in the U.S. Health Examination Survey (HES) and the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES).American Journal of Public Health. 1988,78:910–918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Schnall PL, Landsbergis PA, Baker D: Job strain and cardiovascular disease.Annual Review of Public Health. 1994,15:381–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Karasek RA, Russell R, Theorell T: Physiology of stress and regeneration in job-related cardiovascular illness.Journal of Human Stress. 1982,8:29–42.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Brantley P, Dietz L, McKnight G, Tulley R: Convergence between the Daily Stress Inventory and endocrine measures of stress.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988,56:549–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Jenner D, Reynolds V, Harrison GA: Catecholamine excretion rates and occupation.Ergonomics. 1980,23:237–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Harrison GA, Palmer C, Jenner D, Reynolds V: Associations between rates of urinary catecholamine excretion and aspects of lifestyle among adult women in some Oxfordshire villages.Human Biology. 1981,53:617–633.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Johansson G, Aronsson G: Stress reactions in computerized administrative work.Journal of Occupational Behavior. 1984,5: 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Pollard T, Ungpakorn G, Harrison GA: Some determinants of population variation in cortisol levels in a British urban community.Journal of Biosocial Science. 1992,24:477–485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Johansson G, Aronsson G, Lindstrom B: Social, psychological, and neuroendocrine stress reactions in highly mechanized work.Ergonomics. 1978,21:583–599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Timio M, Gentili S, Pede S: Free adrenaline and noradrenaline excretion related to occupational stress.British Heart Journal. 1979,42:471–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Fibiger W, Christensen F, Singer G, Kaufmann H: Mental and physical components of sawmill operatives' workload.Ergonomics. 1986,29:363–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Levi L: The stress of everyday work as reflected in productiveness, subjective feelings, and urinary output of adrenaline and noradrenaline under salaried and piecework conditions.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1964,8:199–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Rissler A: Stress reactions at work and after work during a period of quantitative overload.Ergonomics. 1977,20:577–580.Google Scholar
  34. (34).
    Cox S, Cox T, Thirlaway M, Mackay C: Effects of simulated repetitive work on urinary catecholamine excretion.Ergonomics. 1982,25:1129–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Lundberg U, Granqvist M, Hansson T, Magnusson M, Wallin L: Psychological and physiological stress responses during repetitive work at an assembly line.Work and Stress. 1989,3:143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Office of Population Censuses and Surveys:Classification of Occupations and Coding Index. London: HMSO, 1980.Google Scholar
  37. (37).
    Warr P: Decision latitude, job demands, and employee well-being.Work and Stress. 1990,4:285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Cronbach L: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika. 1951,16:297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Mackay C, Cox T, Burrows G, Lazzerini T: An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1978,17:283–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    King M, Burrows G, Stanley G: Measurement of stress and arousal: Validation of the stress/arousal adjective checklist.British Journal of Psychology. 1983,74:473–479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Cruickshank P: A stress and arousal mood scale for low vocabulary subjects: A reworking of Mackayet al. (1978).British Journal of Psychology. 1984,75:89–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Warr P: The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health.Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1990,63:193–210.Google Scholar
  43. (43).
    Sevastos P, Smith L, Cordery J: Evidence on the reliability and construct validity of Warr's (1990) well-being and mental health measures.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 1992,65:33–49.Google Scholar
  44. (44).
    Jenner D, Brown M, Lhoste F: Determination of alpha-methyl-dopa, alpha-methylnoradrenaline, noradrenaline, and adrenaline in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection.Journal of Chromatography. 1981,224:507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Jenner D, Richards J: Determination of cortisol and cortisone in urine using high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection.Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 1985,3:251–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Fredrikson M: Psychophysiological and biochemical indices in ‘stress’ research: Applications to psychopathology and pathophysiology. In Turpin G (ed),Handbook of Clinical Psychophysiology. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1989, 241–279.Google Scholar
  47. (47).
    Akerstedt T, Gillberg M, Hjemdahl P, et al: Comparison of urinary and plasma catecholamine responses to mental stress.Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1983,117:19–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. (48).
    Pollard TM: Use of cortisol as a stress marker: Practical and theoretical problems.American Journal of Human Biology. 1995,7: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    Jenner D: Population studies of variation in catecholamine and corticosteroid variation. DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
  50. (50).
    James GD, Jenner DA, Harrison GA, Baker PT: Differences in catecholamine excretion rates, blood pressure, and lifestyle among young Western Samoan men.Human Biology. 1985,57:635–647.Google Scholar
  51. (51).
    Ward M, Mefford I: Methodology of studying catecholamine response to stress. In Steptoe A, Rueddel H, Neus H (eds),Clinical and Methodological Issues in Cardiovascular Psychophysiology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1985, 131–143.Google Scholar
  52. (52).
    James GD, Crews D, Pearson J: Catecholamines and stress. In Little M, Haas J (eds),Human Population Biology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1989, 280–295.Google Scholar
  53. (53).
    Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer D: Salivary cortisol in psychobiological research: An overview.Neuropsychobiology. 1989,22:150–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Russell D: The analysis of psychophysiological data: Multivariate approaches. In Cacioppo J, Tassinary L (eds),Principles of Psychophysiology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1990, 775–801.Google Scholar
  55. (55).
    Gallucci WT, Baum A, Laue L, et al: Sex differences in sensitivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.Health Psychology. 1993,12:420–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. (56).
    van Eck M, Nicolson NA: Perceived stress and salivary cortisol in daily life.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,16:221–227.Google Scholar
  57. (57).
    Frankenhaeuser M, Johansson G: Stress at work: Psychobiological and psychosocial aspects.International Review of Applied Psychology. 1986,35:287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. (58).
    Baum, A, Grunberg N: Gender, stress, and health.Health Psychology. 1991,10:80–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. (59).
    Frankenhaeuser M: The psychophysiology of sex differences as related to occupational status. In Frankenhaeuser M, Lundberg U, Chesney M (eds),Women, Work and Health: Stress and Opportunities. New York: Plenum Press, 1991, 39–61.Google Scholar
  60. (60).
    Saab PG, Matthews KA, Stoney CM, McDonald RH: Premenopausal and postmenopausal women differ in their cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses to behavioral stressors.Psychophysiology. 1989,26:270–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. (61).
    Spector P: Interactive effects of perceived control and job stressors on affective reactions and health outcomes for clerical workers.Work and Stress. 1987,1:155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. (62).
    Fletcher B, Jones F: A refutation of Karasek's demand-discretion model of occupational stress with a range of dependent measures.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1993,14:319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. (63).
    Theorell T, Perski A, Akerstedt T, et al: Changes in job strain in relation to changes in physiological state.Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health. 1988,14:189–196.Google Scholar
  64. (64).
    Doncevic S, Theorell T, Scalia-Tomba G: The psychosocial work environment of district nurses in Sweden.Work and Stress. 1988,2:341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. (65).
    Harenstam A, Theorell T: Cortisol elevation and serum gammaglutamyl transpeptidase in response to adverse job conditions: How are they interrelated.Biological Psychology. 1990,31:157–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. (66).
    Theorell T, Ahlberg-Hulten G, Jodko M, Sigala F, de la Torre B: Influence of job strain and emotion on blood pressure in female hospital personnel during work hours.Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health. 1993,19:313–318.Google Scholar
  67. (67).
    Theorell T, Ahlberg-Hulten G, Sigala F, Perski A, Soderholm M: A psychosocial and biomedical comparison between men in six contrasting service occupations.Work and Stress. 1990,4:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. (68).
    Fibiger W, Singer G, Miller A, Armstrong S, Datar M: Cortisol and catecholamine changes as functions of time-of-day and self-reported mood.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review. 1984,8: 523–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. (69).
    Brown WA, Sirota AD, Niaura R, Engebretson TO: Endocrine correlates of sadness and elation.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993,55:458–467.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tessa M. Pollard
    • 1
  • Giles Ungpakorn
    • 1
  • Geoffrey Ainsworth Harrison
    • 1
  • Katharine R. Parkes
    • 1
  • T. M. Pollard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations