Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 94–100 | Cite as

Results of a volunteer program to conduct dietary intervention research for women

  • Deborah J. Bowen
  • Alan Kuniyuki
  • Ann Shattuck
  • Daniel W. Nixon
  • Robert W. Sponzo
Brief Report


The American Cancer Society (ACS) initiated the Breast Cancer Dietary Intervention Project (BCDIP) to involve community volunteers in cancer-related intervention research activities focused on dietary fat reduction in women with breast cancer. This article presents data on the volunteer aspects of the project, with two aims: (a) to describe the volunteer recruitment and intervention designed for the BCDIP, conducted jointly by the American Cancer Society and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and (b) to present baseline characteristics and predictors of retention of the BCDIP volunteers. There were five types of volunteers, called volunteer adjunct researchers or VARs, in the BCDIP. VARs were recruited using a variety of approaches, including electronic media alerts, flyers in oncology clinics, and notices in the newsletters of state nursing and nutritional professional organizations. Over half of all VARs came from two main sources: the media (television, radio, newspapers) and from work-related sources. Over half (58%) of the VARs had professional licenses in nursing or dietetics, and 46% were employed full-time. Several types of motivations for participating in the BCDIP, including altruistic reasons (want to help others, help people with cancer), health concerns (family/friend with breast cancer, have had cancer), and work-related reasons (gain professional skills) were important. Sixty-eight percent of VARs remained with the project for its entirety. Predictors of retention in the VAR program included previous ACS volunteer experience with initial motivations to volunteer and the interaction of employment status and professional nursing training. In future research and community-based projects, better recruitment and volunteer coordination procedures should be used to reduce dropout rates and maintain volunteer commitment and participation.


Acquire Immune Deficiency Syndrome American Cancer Society Site Coordinator Altruistic Motivation Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Hertert S, Bailey G, Cottingham V, et al: Community volunteers as recruitment staff in a clinical trial: The SHEP experience.Controlled Clinical Trials. 1996,17(1):23–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Wilson M: The role of a manager. InThe Effective Management of Volunteer Programs. Boulder, CO: Volunteer Management Associates, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Cnann A, Goldberg-Glen S: Measuring motivation to volunteer in human services.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1991,27(3):269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Chambre S: The volunteer response to the AIDS epidemic in New York City: Implications for research on voluntarism.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 1991,20:267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    National Research Council:What is America Eating? Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    National Research Council:Diet and Health: Implications for Chronic Disease. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Garfinkel L: Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the American Cancer Society prospective studies.Monographs of the National Cancer Institute. 1985,67:49–52.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Rothman J: Three models of community organization practice. In Cox F, Erlich J, Rothman J, Tropman H (eds),Strategies of Community Organization. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, 1979, 3.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Elder J, McKenna C, Lazieh M, et al: The use of volunteers in mass screening for high blood pressure.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1986,2:268–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Abrams DB, Boutwell WB, Grizzle J, et al: Cancer control at the workplace: The Working Well Trial.Preventive Medicine. 1994,25:15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Kristal AR, Shattuck AL, Bowen DJ, Sponzo RW, Nixon DW: Feasibility of using volunteer research staff to deliver and evaluate a low-fat dietary intervention: The American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Dietary Intervention Project.Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 1997,6:459–467.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Bowen DJ, Henderson MM, Iverson D, et al: Reducing dietary fat: Understanding the success of the Women’s Health Trial.Cancer Prevention International. 1995,1:21–30.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Omoto A, Snyder M: Volunteering to work with people with cancer or AIDS: Differences between me and you. Midwestern Psychological Association. Chicago: May 1989.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge R: Volunteers’ motivations: A functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers.Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 1992,3(4):333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Medvene L: Self-help groups, peer helping, and social comparison. InHelping and Being Helped. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1992, 49–81.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Insull W, Henderson MM, Prentice RL, et al: Results of a randomized feasibility study of a low-fat diet.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1990,150:421–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah J. Bowen
    • 1
  • Alan Kuniyuki
    • 1
  • Ann Shattuck
    • 1
  • Daniel W. Nixon
  • Robert W. Sponzo
    • 2
  1. 1.Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattle
  2. 2.Glens Falls HospitalGlens FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations