Abstract
While focus groups enjoy wide popularity in marketing practice, the methodological complexities of this form of qualitative research are largely ignored. One such issue concerns how different moderators interact with alternative approaches to focus group research to affect group processes and reporting. This study applies a philosophy of science perspective to understanding the theoretical and practical importance of interactions between moderator research philosophies and qualitative information-gathering objectives. The findings from an analysis of 66 moderators show that the conceptual framework used here describes important aspects of focus group work. However, they also show that the distinctions in the framework are not being practiced by marketing researchers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boice, Robert. 1983. “Observational Skills.”Psychological Bulletin 93 (January): 3–29.
Calder, Bobby J. 1977. “Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 353–364.
Carmines, Edward G. and Richard A. Zeller. 1979.Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fern, Edward F. 1982. “The Use of Focus Groups for Idea Generation: The Effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceship, and Moderator on Response Quantity and Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (February): 1–13.
Fowler, J. Floyd and Thomas M. Mangione. 1990.Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Goldman, Alfred E. 1962. “The Group Depth Interview.”Journal of Marketing 26 (July): 61–68.
Goldman, Alfred E. and Susan S. McDonald. 1987.The Group Depth Interview: Principles and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gordon, Wendy and Robert T. Langmaid. 1988.Qualitative Marketing Research: A Practitioner’s and Buyer’s Guide. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.
Greenbaum, Thomas. 1988.The Practical Handbook and Guide to Focus Group Research. Boston: D. C. Health and Company.
Krueger, Richard A. 1991.Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
McDaniel, Carl. 1979. “Focus Groups—Their Role in the Marketing Research Process.”Akron Business and Economic Review 10 (June): 14–19.
McDonald, William J. 1980. ‘Group Research: Applications and Philosophies.” Unpublished working paper. University of Illinois at Chicago Circle.
Morgan, David L. 1991.Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Stewart, David W. and Prem N. Shamdasani. 1991.Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Templeton, Jane. 1988.Focus Groups: A Guide for Marketing and Advertising Professionals. Chicago: Probus.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Prior to joining Hofstra, Dr. McDonald spent 12 years working for various companies and advertising agencies. He also taught marketing courses for several years at the University of Illinois. Dr. McDonald earned his Ph.D. in Behavioral Science from the University of Chicago. He has presented numerous marketing topics before professional associations. Dr. McDonald’s articles have appeared in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Direct Marketing, The Gerontologist, and others.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonald, W.J. Focus group research dynamics and reporting: An examination of research objectives and moderator influences. JAMS 21, 161–168 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894427
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894427