Skip to main content
Log in

Fine structure of somatotrophs and mammotrophs in the pituitary pars distalis of the little (lit) mutant mouse

  • Published:
Virchows Archiv B

Summary

The cellular pathology and postnatal differentiation of somatotrophs and mammotrophs in the pars distalis oflittle (lit/lit) and normal (+ /+;lit/+) mice were studied by means of electron microscopy. The results indicate that inlittle the pituitary at birth contains recognizable somatotrophs and mammotrophs; however, between 14 and 24 days of age a contrast betweenlittle and normal becomes conspicuous with respect to the somatotrophs.Little somatotrophs are less heavily populated with granules, have granules of smaller size, and show less developed organelles than do normal somatotrophs at comparable stages. Beyond 24 days thelittle somatotrophs become more difficult to locate, and those that do occur show a minimal increase in complexity from that present at 14 days. In contrast, the mammotrophs inlittle are similar in appearance to normal mammotrophs and show increasing complexity as development proceeds, often sending forth cellular processes between neighboring cells, as do normal mammotrophs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes BG (1963) The fine sturcture of the mouse adenohypophysis in various physiological states. In: Benoit J, DaLage C (eds) Cytologie de l’adénohypophyse. CNRS, Paris, pp 91–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamer WG, Eicher EM (1976) Stimulation of growth in the little mouse. J Endocrinol 71: 37–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eicher EM, Beamer WG (1976) Inherited ateliotic dwarfism in mice. Heredity 67: 87–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furth J, Chlifton KH (1966) Experimental pituitary tumors. In: Harris GW, Donovan BT (eds) The pituitary gland, vol 2. Univ Calif. Press, Berkeley, pp 460–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth J, Ueda G, Clifton KH (1973) The pathophysiology of pituitaries and their tumors: methological advances. In: Busch H (ed) Methods of cancer research, vol X, chapt VIII. Academic Press, New York, pp 301–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Dumm LA, Echave-Llanos JM (1972) Further studies on the ultrastructure of the pars distalis of the male mouse hypophysis. Acta Anat 82: 254–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herlant M (1963) Apport de la microscopie électronique à l’étude du lobe antérieur de l’hypophyse. In: Benoit J, DaLage C (eds) Cytologie de l’adénohypophyse. CNRS, Paris, pp 73–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath E, Kovacs K, Killinger DW, Smythe HS, Platts ME, Weiss MS, Ezrin C (1980) Mammosomatotroph cell adenoma of the human pituitary. Proc Elect Mic Soc Am 38: 726–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough EM, Wood BG (1979) Mammary gland development during pregnancy in the dwarf mouse mutant, little. Tissue Cell 11: 773–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons JA, Erlandsen SL, DeBault LE (1974) Identification of prolactin cells in a mammosomatotropic tumor by the unlabeled-antibody peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 145: 524–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons JA, Erlandsen SL, Carpenter AM, DeBault LE (1978) Heterogeneity of the MtTW15 mammosomatotropic tumor. I. Light microscopic evaluation of cell types by means of immunocytochemistry, morphometric quantitation, fluorescence cytophotometry, and radioimmunoassay. Anat Rec 190: 719–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons JA, Baskin DG, Erlandsen SL (1980) Heterogeneity of the MtTW15 mammosomatotropic tumor. II. Characterization of parenchymal cells by superimposition immunocytochemistry and electron microscopy. Anat Rec 196: 301–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rimoin DL, Schimke RN (1971) Anterior pituitary. Genetic disorders of the endocrine glands. LV Mosby Co, St. Louis, pp 11–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano M (1962) Further studies on the theta cell of the mouse anterior pituitary as revealed by electron microscopy, with special reference to the mode of secretion. J Cell Biol 15: 85–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DB, Christensen E (1980) Postnatal development of somatotrophs and mammotrophs in the pars distalis of the C57BL mouse. Cell Tiss Res 211: 411–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DB Christensen E (1981) The fine structure of somatotrophs and mammotrophs during development of the dwarf (dw) mutant mouse. J Anat (in press)

  • Yamada K, Sano M (1960) Electron microscopic observations of the anterior pituitary of the mouse. Okajimas Folia Anat Jap 34: 449–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita K (1969) Electron microscopic observations on the postnatal development of the anterior pituitary of the mouse. Gunma Symp Endocrinol 6: 177–196

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by NIH grant no. HD12308 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, USPHS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, E., Wilson, D.B. Fine structure of somatotrophs and mammotrophs in the pituitary pars distalis of the little (lit) mutant mouse. Virchows Archiv B Cell Pathol 37, 89–96 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02892558

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02892558

Key words

Navigation