Skip to main content
Log in

Socializing children about television: An intergenerational study

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes a study on mothers’ views of television and children’s perceptions of their mothers’ socialization efforts regarding television. Results from the investigation involving 174 mother and child (in Grades 3–6) dyads suggest that mothers’ perceptions of their responsibilities regarding children’s television viewing vary by parental style. In addition, children’s perceptions of mothers’ verbal interactions about TV and coviewing together with opinions, monitoring, and controlling of television similarly vary across parental styles. These findings support previous research that parental styles play a role in determining the manner in which mothers socialize their offspring about television.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, Bill. 1984. “TV Ads, Shows Struggle to Replace Bygone Images of Today’s Mothers.”Wall Street Journal, October 5, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acock, Alan and Vern L. Bengston. 1980. “Socialization and Attribution Processes: Actual Versus Perceived Similarity Among Parents and Youth.”Journal of Marriage and the Family 42 (August): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, Joan. 1974. “Commentaries on Ward, ‘Consumer Socialization.’”Journal of Consumer Research 1: 15–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, Ronald. 1988. “Mom Leaves Her Mark in Loyalty to Products.”Wall Street Journal January 19, p. 1.

  • Armentrout, James A. and Gary K. Burger. 1972. “Factor Analysis of College Students’ Recall of Parental Child-Rearing Behaviors.”Journal of Genetic Psychology 121 (September): 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. and R. H. Walters. 1963.Social Learning and Personality Development. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Thomas E. 1978. “Children’s Television Advertising: The Attitudes and Opinions of Elementary School Guidance Counselors.”Journal of Advertising 7 (Fall): 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, Diana 1968. “Authoritarian vs. Authoritative Parental Control.”Adolescence 3 (Fall): 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1971. “Current Patterns of Parental Authority.”Developmental Psychology Monagraph 4 (January): 1–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. “New Directions in Socialization Research.”American Psychologist 35: 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. “Parenting Styles and Adolescent Development.” InThe Encyclopedia on Adolescence. Eds. R. Lerner, A. C. Peterson, and J. Brooks-Gunn. New York: Garland, 746–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. “The Discipline Controversy Revisited.”Family Relations 45: 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Wesley C. 1964. “Consequences of Different Kinds of Parental Discipline.” InReview of Child Development Research, Vol. 1. Eds. Martin L. Hoffman and Lois W. Hoffman. New York: Russell Sage, 169–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belch, George E., Michael A. Belch, and Gayle Ceresino. 1985. “Parental and Teenage Child Influences in Family Decision Making.”Journal of Business Research 13: 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, Merrie, Gary M. Armstrong, and Marvin E. Goldberg. 1988. “Children’s Use of Cognitive Defenses Against Television Advertising: A Cognitive Response Approach.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (March): 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Les and Sanford Grossbart. 1988. “Parental Style and Consumer Socialization of Children.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (June): 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Sanford Grossbart, and J. Kathleen Stuenkel. 1992. “The Role of Parental Socialization Types on Differential Family Communication Patterns Regarding Consumption.”Journal of Consumer Psychology 1 (1): 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Russell N. Laczniak, and Darrel D. Muehling. 1994. “Understanding Parental Concern About Toy-Based Programming: New Insights From Socialization Theory.”Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 16 (2): 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, F. Scott, Richard A. Fabes, and Patricia M. Wilson. 1989. “Family Television Viewing: Implications for Family Life Education.”Family Relations 38 (April): 210–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Lawrence A. and Sanford L. Grossbart. 1984. “Parental Style Tendencies and Concern About Children’s Advertising.”Current Issues in Research in Advertising 1: 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, Douglas and David Marlowe. 1964.The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Independence. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabes, Richard A., Patricia M. Wilson, and F. Scott Christopher. 1989. “A Time to Re-Examine the Role of Television in Family Life.”Family Relations 38 (July): 210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxman, Ellen R., Patriya S. Tansuhaj, and Karin M. Ekstrom. 1989. “Family Members’ Perceptions of Adolescents’ Influence in Family Decision Making.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (March): 484–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Howard. 1982.Developmental Psychology: An Introduction. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, Kristan L., Sanford M. Dornbusch, Lisa Troyer, Laurence Steinberg, and Philip L. Ritter. 1997. “Parenting Styles, Adolescents’ Attributions, and Educational Outcomes in Nine Heterogeneous High Schools.”Child Development 68 (June): 507–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossbart, Sanford L. and Lawrence A. Crosby. 1984. “Understanding the Bases of Parental Concern and Reactions to Children’s Food Advertising.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer): 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, Deborah Roedder. 1999a. “Consumer Socialization: A Retrospective Look at Twenty-Five Years of Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 26 (December): 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999b. “Through the Eyes of a Child: Children’s Knowledge and Understanding of Advertising.” InAdvertising to Children: Concepts and Controversies. Eds. M. Carole Macklin and Les Carlson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, Geoffrey. 1982.Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Won Yong, Stanley J. Baran, and Kimberly K. Massey. 1988. “Impact of the VCR on Control of Television Viewing.”Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 32 (Summer): 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamborn, Susie D., Nina S. Mounts, Laurence Steinberg, and Sanford M. Dornbusch. 1991. “Patterns of Competence and Adjustment Among Adolescents From Authoritative, Authoritarian, Indulgent, and Neglectful Families.”Child Development 62: 1049–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, Eleanor E. and John A. Martin. 1983. “Socialization in the Context of Family: Parent-Child Interaction.” InHandbook of Child Psychology. 4th ed. Ed. Paul H. Mussen. New York: John Wiley, 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, Sunil and Dandra Torges. 1977. “Determinants of Children’s Influences on Mothers’ Buying Behavior.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4. Ed. William D Perreault, Jr. Atlanta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, George. 1985. “The Role of Family Communication in Consumer Socialization of Children and Adolescents.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (March): 898–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Elizabeth S. and Richard J. Lutz. 1988. “Intergenerational Influences in the Formation of Attitudes and Beliefs About the Marketplace: Mothers and Daughters.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 15. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 461–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore-Shay, Elizabeth S. and Britto M. Berchmans. 1996. “The Role of Family Environment in the Development of Shared Consumption Values: An Integrated Study.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 23. Eds. Kim P. Corfman and John G. Lynch, Jr. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehling, Darrel D., Les Carlson, and Russell N. Laczniak. 1992. “Parental Perceptions of Toy-Based Programs: An Exploratory Analysis.”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 11: 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. 1977.Research on Effects of Television Advertising on Children: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research. Washington, DC: NSF Rann Program, Division of Advanced Productivity Research and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, Kay M. and Robert E. Wilkes. 1997. “Adolescent-Parent Interaction in Family Decision Making.”Journal of Consumer Research 24 (2): 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Gary W. and Geoffrey K. Leigh. 1986. “Adolescents in Family Relationships.” InAdolescents. Eds. G. W. Peterson and G. K. Leigh. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Reading, Writing, and … Buying?” 1998.Consumer Reports 63 (September): 45–48.

  • Rickel, Annette and Lawrence L. Biasatti. 1982. “Modification of the Block Child Rearing Practices Report.”Journal of Clinical Psychology 38 (January): 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas S. 1979. “Parental Mediation of Television Advertising Effects.”Journal of Communication 29 (Winter): 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John R. and Thomas Robertson. 1974. “Children’s TV Commercials: Testing the Defenses.”Journal of Communication 24 (Autumn): 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1975. “Children’s Television Viewing: An Examination of Parent-Child Consensus.”Sociometry 38 (2): 308–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, Earl S. and Richard Q. Bell. 1958. “Development of a Parental Attitude Research Instrument.”Child Development 29 (3): 339–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorce, Patricia, Lynette Loomis, and Philip R. Tyler. 1989. “Intergenerational Influence on Consumer Decision Making.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 16. Ed. Thomas E. Scrull. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Ann D., Russell N. Laczniak, and Les Carlson. 1998. “Mothers’ Preferences for Regulating Children’s Television.”Journal of Advertising 27 (Fall): 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Scott. 1974.Consumer Socialization.” Working Paper, Preliminary Research Report. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. “Consumer Socialization.” InPerspectives in Consumer Behavior. Eds. Harold H. Kassarjian and Thomas Robertson. Glenville, IL: Scott, Foresman, 380–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Daniel B. Wackman. 1972. “Children’s Purchase Influence Attempts and Parental Yielding.”Journal of Marketing Research 9 (August): 316–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Ellen A. Wartella. 1977.How Children Learn to Buy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, Les B. and Viktor Gecas. 1988. “Value Attributions and Value Transmission Between Parents and Children.”Journal of Marriage and the Family 50 (August): 829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, James. 1980.Parents and Peers in Social Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Jacqueline Smollar. 1985.Adolescent Relations With Mothers, Fathers, and Friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Les Carlson (Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is a professor of marketing at Clemson University. His research interests center on consumer socialization and environmental advertising. His work has appeared inInternational Marketing Review, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Advertising, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Journal of General Psychology, Journal of Macromarketing, Journal of Marketing Education, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, and various conference proceedings. He is a past editor of theJournal of Advertising.

Russell N. Laczniak (Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is a professor of marketing and chair, Departments of Management and Marketing, at Iowa State University. His primary research interests deal with marketing communication. His research has been published in theJournal of Consumer Psychology, Journal of Advertising, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Journal of Business Research, Psychology and Marketing, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Journal of Marketing Communications, Marketing Letters, and various conference proceedings.

Ann Walsh (Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is an assistant professor of marketing at Western Illinois University. She has published in theJournal of Advertising, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Consumer Affairs, and American Marketing Association Educators’ Proceedings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, L., Laczniak, R.N. & Walsh, A. Socializing children about television: An intergenerational study. JAMS 29, 276–288 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890785

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890785

Keywords

Navigation