Advertisement

Virchows Archiv B

, 47:211 | Cite as

Monocytes and radiation-induced atheromatosis in rabbits

  • M. W. Aarnoudse
  • H. B. Lamberts
  • F. Dijk
  • J. Vos
  • A. J. de Vries
Article

Summary

Previous experiments have shown that local irradiation of the carotid arteries of hypercholesterolemic rabbits results in the development of atheromatosis in the irradiated areas of the arteries. The process starts with the adherence of monocytes to the endothelial layer, their entrance into the subendothelial space, and their subsequent transformation into lipophages (foam cells). Prevention of this type of plaque formation can be achieved by prednisolone (in a lower concentration than previously used) (Vos et al. 1981) and by VP16-213 (Vepesid).

Differential blood cell counts demonstrated that the animals subjected to treatment with prednisolone developed a moderate relative lymphocytopenia, whereas treatment with Vepesid resulted in a severe monocytopenia.

Since prednisolone treatment only partially prevented plaque formation, whereas Vepesid seemed to fully inhibit the development of plaques, we conclude that although a role of the lymphocyte in the process of plaque formation cannot be excluded, the monocyte seems to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of radiation-induced atheromatosis.

Key words

Irradiation Atheromatosis Prevention Monocytopenia 

References

  1. Aarnoudse MW (1979) Vessel wall damage by X-rays and 15 MeV neutrons. An experimental study. Thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  2. Gerrity RG (1981) The role of the monocyte in atherogenesis. I. Transition of blood-borne monocytes into foam cells in fatty lesions. Am J Pathol 103:181–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerrity RG, Naito HK, Richardson M, Schwartz CJ (1979) Dietary induced atherogenesis in swine: Morphology of the intima in prelesion stages. Am J Pathol 95:775–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansson GK, Björnheden T, Bylock A, Bondjers G (1981) Fc-dependent binding of monocytes to areas with endothelial injury in the rabbit aorta. Exp Mol Pathol 34:264–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Parrillo JE, Fauci AS (1979) Mechanisms of glucocorticoid action on immune processes. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 19:179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Smit Sibinga CTh (1973) Prevention of vessel damage in experimental irradiation. Bibl Anat 12:242–248Google Scholar
  7. Thörig L, Thompson J, Eulderink F, Emeis JJ, Van Furth R (1980) Effects of monocytopenia and anticoagulation in experimental streptococcus sanguis endocarditis. Br J Exp Pathol 61:108–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vos J, Dijk F, Aarnoudse MW, Lamberts HB (1981) Prevention of radiation-induced atheromatous plaque formation by prednisolone. A morphologic exploration. Cell Biol Int Rep 5:466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vos J, Aarnoudse MW, Dijk F, Lamberts HB (1983) On the cellular origin and development of atheromatous plaques. A light and electron microscopic study of combined X-ray and hypercholesterolemia-induced atheromatosis in the carotid artery of the rabbit. Virchows Arch [Cell Pathol] 43:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. W. Aarnoudse
    • 1
  • H. B. Lamberts
    • 1
  • F. Dijk
    • 2
  • J. Vos
    • 2
  • A. J. de Vries
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory for Radiopathology, Bloemsingel 1GroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Medical Electron MicroscopyUniversity of GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations