Advertisement

American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 167–197 | Cite as

Ivy league delinquency: A self-report analysis

  • Alexis M. Durham
Articles

Abstract

Since the 1940s, self-report technology has been utilized to improve our understanding of the frequency and distribution of crime and delinquency. Findings based upon self-reports have called into question the traditional class-based view of criminality. It is now apparent that middle- and upper-class young people are involved in delinquent activity, although the precise extent and nature of such involvement remains unclear. The research detailed in this report attempts to add to our understanding of class and illegal activities by examining a sample of Ivy League undergraduates for evidence of participation in serious forms of delinquency. It can be argued that such a sample is especially interesting both because these respondents represent the “best and the brightest,” and because they possess relatively advantaged positions regarding access to conventional kinds of power and success. The findings indicate that serious delinquency is by no means rare among these youth. Involvement in violence, however, appears to be relatively infrequent and weighted toward the less serious end of the continuum of violent delinquency. In addition, the delinquent activity of this sample was highly diverse. Even for the most serious offenders the results provide little evidence of offense specialization.

Keywords

Delinquent Behavior American Sociological Review Violent Offender Uniform Crime Report Delinquent Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akers, Ronald L., James Massey, William Clarke, and Ronald M. Lauer, M.D. (1983) “Are Self-Reports of Adolescent Deviance Valid? Biochemical Measures, Randomized Response, and the Bogus Pipeline in Smoking Behavior,”Social Forces 62:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braithwaite, John (1981) “The Myth of Social Class and Criminality Reconsidered,”American Sociological Review 46:36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canter, Rachelle (1982) “Sex Differences in Self-Report Delinquency,”Criminology 20(3–4):373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cernkovich, Stephen A. and Peggy C. Giordano (1987) “Family Relationships and Delinquency,”Criminology 25(2):295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, John and Larry L. Tifft (1966) “Polygraph and Interview Validation of Self-Reported Deviant Behavior,”American Sociological Review 31:516–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, Albert K. (1955)Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chilton, Roland J. (1967) “Middle Class Delinquency and Specific Offense Analysis” inMiddle-Class Juvenile Delinquency, ed. Edmund W. Vaz (1967).Google Scholar
  8. Cloward, Richard and Lloyd Ohlin (1960)Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. College Board (1986) Personal Communication: Atlanta office.Google Scholar
  10. Elliot, Delbert S. and Harwin L. Voss (1974)Delinquency and Dropout. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  11. Elliot, D.S. and Susanne S. Ageton (1980) “Reconciling Race and Class Differences in Self-Reported and Official Rates of Delinquency,”American Sociological Review 45:95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, D.S. and David Huizinga (1983) “Social Class and Delinquent Behavior in a National Youth Panel: 1976–1980,”Criminology 21:149–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliot, D.S., S.S. Ageton, D. Huizinga, B.A. Knowles, and R.J. Canter (1983)The Prevalence and Incidence of Delinquent Behavior: 1976–1980 National Youth Survey Project Report 26. Behavioral Research Institute: Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  14. Elliot, D. S., D. Huizinga, S. S. Ageton (1985)Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, The National Youth Survey, Project Report No. 21. Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Elliot, D. S., David Huizinga, and Susanne Ageton (1985)Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Pub.Google Scholar
  16. Erickson, Maynard L. and Lamar T. Empey (1963) “Court Records, Undetected Delinquency, and Decision-Making,”Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science,54.Google Scholar
  17. Fagan, Jeffrey, Elizabeth Piper, and Melinda Moore (1986) “Violent Delinquents and Urban Youths,”Criminology 24(3):439–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrington, David P. (1973) “Self-reports of Deviant Behavior: Predictive and Stable?”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 69:99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farrington, David (1982) “Longitudinal Analyses of Criminal Violence” inCriminal Violence, eds. M.E. Wolfgang and N.A. Weiner, Beverly Hills: Sage Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  20. Gold, M. (1966) “Undetected Delinquent Behavior,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 13:27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gottfredson, Michael R. and Michael J. Hindelang (1979) “A Study of the Behavior of Law,”American Sociological Review 44(Feb):3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenberg, Bernard G., James R. Abernathy, and Daniel G. Horovitz (1970) “A New Survey Technique and its Application in the Field of Public Health,”Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 68:39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamparian, D., R. Schuster, S. Dinitz, and J. Conrad (1978)The Violent Few. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  24. Hindelang, Michael J., Travis Hirschi, and Joseph Weis (1979) “Correlates of Delinquency: The Illusion of Discrepancy Between Self-Report and Official Measures,”American Sociological Review 44:995–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirschi, Travis (1969)Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hirschi, Travis, Michael J. Hindelang, and Joseph Weis (1982) “Reply to ‘On the Use of Self-Report Data to Determine the Class Distribution of Criminal and Delinquent Behavior”,American Sociological Review 47(3): 433–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ignatieff, Michael (1978)A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kempf, Kimberly (1987) “Specialization and the Criminal Career”,Criminology 25(2): 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kleck, Gary (1982) “On the Use of Self-Report Data to Determine the Class Distribution of Criminal and Delinquent Behavior”,American Sociological Review 47(3): 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matza, David (1964)Delinquency and Drift. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, Walter B. (1958) “Lower Class Culture as a Generating Mileau of Gang Delinquency”,Journal of Social Issues 14: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Myerhoff, Howard L. and Barbara G. Myerhoff (1964) “Field Observations of Middle-Class Gangs”,Social Forces 42(March): 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nye, F. Ivan and James F. Short (1957) “Scaling Delinquent Behavior”,American Sociological Review 22: 326–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nye, F. Ivan, James F. Short, and Virgil J. Olson (1958) “Socioeconomic Status and Delinquent Behavior”,American Journal of Sociology 63(4): 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petersilia, J., P. Greenwood, Lavin, M. (1978)Criminal Careers of Habitual Felons. Washington, D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.Google Scholar
  36. Porterfield, Austin (1943) “Delinquency and its Outcome in Court and College”,American Journal of Sociology 44: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porterfield, Austin (1946)Youth in Trouble. Austin, Texas: Leo Potishman Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Rothman, David (1971)The Discovery of the Asylum. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  39. Schreiber, E.M. (1976) “Dirty Data in Britain and the USA: The Reliability of ‘Invariant’ Characteristics Reported in Surveys”,Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sykes, G. and D. Matza (1958) “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency”,American Sociological Review 22: 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaw, Clifford R. and Henry D. McKay (1942)Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Simcha-Fagan, Ora and Joseph E. Schwartz (1986) “Neighborhood and Delinquency: An Assessment of Contextual Effects”,Criminology 24(4): 667–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tittle, Charles R., Wayne J. Villamez, and Douglas A. Smith (1978) “The Myth of Social Class and Criminality: An Empirical Assessment of the Empirical Evidence”,American Sociological Review 43: 643–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tittle, Charles R. (1983) “Social Class and Criminal Behavior: A Critique of the Theoretical Foundation”,Social Forces 62: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tracy, Paul E. and James A. Fox (1981) “The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements”,American Sociological Review 46: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Voss, H.C. (1963) “Ethnic Differentials in Delinquency in Honolulu”,Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 54: 322–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wallerstein, James S. and Clement Wyle (1947) “Our Law-Abiding Law-Breakers”,Federal Probation 25: 107–112.Google Scholar
  48. Weaver, C.N. and C.L. Swanson (1974) “Validity of Reported Date of Birth, Salary, and Seniority”,Public Opinion Quarterly 38: 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiss, D.J. and R.V. Davis (1960) “An Objective Validation of Factual Interview Data”,Journal of Applied Psychology 44: 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolfgang, Marvin E. (1963) “Uniform Crime Reports: A Critical Appraisal”,University of Pennsylvania Law Review 111: 708–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolfgang, Marvin E., Robert M. Figlio, and Thorsten Sellin (1972)Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wolfgang, Marvin E., Robert M. Figlio, Paul E. Tracy, and Simon E. Singer (1985)The National Survey of Crime Severity. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  53. Zeisel, Hans (1973) “FBI Statistics: A Detective Story”,American Bar Association Journal, 59(May): 510.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexis M. Durham
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FloridaUSA

Personalised recommendations