Biologia Plantarum

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 35–41 | Cite as

Autoradiographic detection of the uptake of the label from bacterial3H-DNA in relation to the kinetics of the mitotic cycle in barley embryos

  • P. Tichý
  • M. Ondřej
  • Květuše Schwammenhöferová
Original Papers


Extirped barley embryos were pre-cultivated in aerated liquid nutrient solution for 24 h and then cultivated for 6 h in nutrient solution containing either3H-DNA fromBacillus subtilis or3H-thymidine. After this treatment the embryos were thoroughly washed and transferred to the fresh nutrient medium. Samples were fixed at different intervals up to 24 h. Feulgen squashes were made and covered with autoradiographic emulsion. Microautodiagrams of different parts of the embryos (root meristem, shoot apex plus meristem of the third leaf, second leaf meristem, coleoptile, scutelum) were observed. Labelling of the nuclei after the application of both3H-DNA and3H-thymidine was found in the proliferating parts of the embryos but no label was found in the scutelum. The labelling index values were almost similar in different embryo organs after the treatment with3H-DNA and3H-thymidine. Labelling index and the fraction of labelled mitoses at different intervals after the application of the labelled substances were almost similar after treatment with3H-DNA and3H-thymidine, except some variations due to irrelevant differences in the kinetics of the mitotic cycle. No disappearance of the activity of3H-DNA was observed at different intervals after removal from the labelled solutions during cultivation for other 24 h in non-labelled nutrient medium either containing DNA fromBacillus subtilis or without it. The embryos which were immersed into 0.2% NaCl solution with either one of the labelled compounds did not show any initiation of the S phase nor uptake of3H-DNA. All these results demonstrate that the label from3H-DNA is localized in those cell nuclei which were in the S phase during treatment but they do not yet distinguish unambiguously between the adsorbtion of polymerous DNA or its degradation and reutilization of low-molecular weight products.


Root Meristem Mitotic Cycle Barley Embryo Label Mitosis Fresh Nutrient Medium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gahan, P. B., Anker, P., Stroun, M.: An autoradiographio study of bacterial DNA inLycopersicum esculentum. - Ann. Bot.37: 681–685, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Gichner, T., Ondřej, M., Limen, Se, Velemínský, J.: The effect of methyl methanesulphonate on mitosis and chromosomes of excised barley embryos. - Biol. Plant.18: 397–400, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hotta, Y., Stern, N. H.: Uptake and distribution of heterologous DNA in living cells. - In:Ledoux, L. (ed.): Information Macromolecules in Biological Systems. Pp. 176–186, Academic Press, New York -London 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Kleinhofs, A., Eden, F. C., Chilton, M., Bendich, A. J.: On the question of the integration of exogenous bacterial DNA into plant nuclei. - Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. USA72: 2748 to 2752, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kleinhofs, A., Ulrich, T. H.: Uptake and fate of exogenous DNA in plants. - In:Gaul, H. P. K. (ed.): Barley Genetics Vol. III. Pp. 11–19. Verlag K. Thiemig, München 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Ledoux, L.: Uptake of DNA by living cells. - In:Davidson, J. N., Cohn, W. E. (ed.): Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology. Vol. 4. Pp. 231–267. Academic Press, New York-London 1965.Google Scholar
  7. Ledoux, L.: Fate of exogenous DNA in plants. - In:Ledoux, L. (ed.): Genetic Manipulation with Plant Material. Pp. 479–496. Academic Press, New York-London 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ledoux, L., Huart, R.: Fate of exogenous bacterial deoxyribonucleic acids in plant seedlings. - J. mol. Biol.43: 243–262, 1969.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Marmur, J.: A procedure for the isolation of DNA from microorganisms. - J. mol. Biol.3: 208 to 218, 1961.Google Scholar
  10. Miflin, B. J.: A technique for the sterile culture of germinating barley embryos. - J. exp. Bot.20: 805–809, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ondřej, M., Tichý, P.: Autoradiographic detection of uptake of bacterial3H-DNA label by barley seeds and isolated barley embryos. - Biol. Plant.20: 67–69, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sohwammenhöferová, K., Ondřej, M.: Mitotic cycle kinetics of root meristems of isolated barley embryos and intact seedlings. Labelling of nuclei by3H-thymidine and its cytogenetic consequences. - Biol. Plant.20: 351–358, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schwammenhöferová, K., Ondřej, M.: Mitotic cycle kinetics of root meristems of isolated barley embryos and intact seedlings. Labelling of nuclei by tetraploidy. - Biol. Plant.20: 409–417, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academia 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Tichý
    • 1
  • M. Ondřej
    • 2
  • Květuše Schwammenhöferová
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of MicrobiologyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPraha-KrčCzechoslovakia
  2. 2.Institute of Experimental BotanyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPraha 6Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations