Skip to main content
Log in

The value of in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The value of the combined in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) T1-weighted (T1-W) breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging, especially for fat content, was evaluated. Non-contrast-enhanced IP and OP T1-W GRE breath-hold images were obtained in 76 patients refereed for abdominal MRI at 1. 5T. 76 patients were divided into three groups for analysis: (1) liver without mass (n=8); (2) liver with hepatoma (n=34); (3) liver with haemangioma or cyst (n=34). Liver/spleen and liver/lesion signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed for lesion detection. Images between IP and OP sequences were compared quantitatively. The results showed that there was not statistically significant difference in liver/spleen and liver/lesion SNR between IP and OP sequences. In the patients with fatty infiltration, the OP sequences yielded substantially lower values for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SNR than those of the IP sequences. Furthermore, OP imaging showed fatty infiltration in 14 cases and demonstrated hyperintense peritumor rim in 4 cases. In 14 cases of fatty infiltration, many lesions were identified using IP images. The use of IP and OP GRE sequences provides complementary diagnostic information for hepatic lesions and fat content. Focal hepatic lesions may be obscured in the setting of fatty infiltration if only OP sequences are employed. A complete assessment of the liver with MR should include both IP and OP imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin J, Sentis M, Puig Jet al. Comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase GRE and conventional SE MR pulse sequences in T1-weighted imaging of liver lesions. JCAT, 1996, 20(6): 890

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin J, Catasus X, Puig J. Chemical-shift gradient-echo MR imaging: an accurate method to characterize liver nodules for fat content. Magnetom, 1999, 6(1): 6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Takashima Tet al. Fatty metamorphisis in hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic feature in 10 cases. AJR, 1988, 151: 717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeny P C, Baron R L, Teefey S A. Hepatocellular carcinoma: reduced frequency of typical findings with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in non-Asian population Radiology, 1992, 182: 143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevens W R, Johson C D, Stephens D Het al. CT findings in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of tumor characteristics with causative factors, tumor size, and histologic tumor grade. Radiology, 1994, 191: 531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin J, Sentis M, Zidan Aet al. Fatty metamorphosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Detection with chemicalshift gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology, 1995, 195: 125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eguchi A, Nakashima D. Okudaira Set al. Adenomatious hyperplasia in the vicinity of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 1992, 15: 843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell D G, Crovello M, Matteucci Tet al. Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology, 1992, 185: 345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hooper L D. Mergo P J. Ros P R. Multiple hepatorenal angiomyolipomas: diagnosis with fat suppression, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Abdom Imag, 1994, 19: 549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haibo, X., Donglin, J., Lian, Y. et al. The value of in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging. Current Medical Science 20, 290–293 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888182

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888182

Key words

Navigation