Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of radiographic interpretation of silica exposed workers using the 1963 and the 1986 Chinese roentgenodiagnostic criteria of pneumoconioses

  • Published:
Journal of Tongji Medical University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

As part of a larger study relating to silica exposure, silicosis, and lung cancer mortality in Chinese mine and factory workers, 1936 old posterior-anterior chest X-rays were re-interpreted according to the 1986 Chinese Roentgenodiagnostic Criteria of pneumoconioses. Each film was independently read by three individuals from a panel of eleven radiologists, and this reading was compared to the original one. Subsequent to the independent readings, a groups of three readers interpreted the films together, called the consensus readings. Comparisons were made by Chinese stage of pneumoconiosis. For the entire cohort, there was a crude agreement of 57.4% between the old and the new interpretations. Agreement within one step of full agreement was 92.5%. The interpretations done by median reading and by consensus were very similar. In general, there was a tendency for the old readings to be slightly higher compared to the new interpretations. This tendency was most marked in the tin mines, followed in decreasing order by the iron/copper mines, the potteries, and the tungsten mines. The agreement between the old and new interpretations is felt to be satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang JQ, Hong YZ. A comparsion of Chinese diagnostic standards of silicotic radiographs and the ILO International classification of radiographs of pneumoconioses. Ann Occu Hyg 1984;28: 13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The 1986 Chinese roentgenodiagnostic criteria for the pneumoconioses, Chinese academy of preventive medicine, Beijing, 1986

  3. Hodous TK, et al. Wuhan-American comparison, A comparison of pneumoconiosis interpretation between Chinese and American readers and classifications. J Tongji Med Univ 1991; 11(4): 225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen J, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Phychol Meas 1960; 20:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ducatman AM, et al. B-readers and asbestos medical surveillance. J Occup Med 1988; 30:644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker DL, et al. Public health implications of the variability in the interpretation of “B” readings for pleural changes. J Occup Med 1989;31:775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reger RB. et al. The effect of film quality and other factors on the roentgenographic categorization of coal workers pneumoconiosis. Am J Roent Rad Ther Nuc Med 1972;115:462

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearson NG, et al. Effect of quality of chest radiographs on categorization of Coal workers pneumoconiosis. Br J Ind Med 1965; 22:81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher CM, Oldham PD. Problem of consistent radiological diagnoses in coal miners pneumoconiosis. Br J Ind Med 1949; 6:168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rong-an, C., Hodous, T.K., Zuo-xue, L. et al. A comparison of radiographic interpretation of silica exposed workers using the 1963 and the 1986 Chinese roentgenodiagnostic criteria of pneumoconioses. Journal of Tongji Medical University 12, 120–123 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887794

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887794

Key words

Navigation