American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 181–188 | Cite as

Individual neighborhood attachment and perceptions of neighborhood safety

  • Matt Delisi
  • Bob Regoli


Macrostructural research in the social disorganization tradition assumes neighborhood structure dictates individual behavior. The current research explores the opposite perspective to determine whether individual attachment to the neighborhood influences perceptions of neighborhood safety. Using the Chicago Metropolitan Area Survey, the results show that loners, persons wishing to move, and renters perceive their neighborhoods as being less safe than attached residents. Implications for future research are offered.


Social Disorganization Neighborhood Safety Criminal Victimization Social Disorganization Theory Urban Affair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, M. D., & Baba, Y. (1990). Social determinants of neighborhood attachment.Sociological Spectrum, 10, 59–78.Google Scholar
  2. Baumer, T. (1985). Testing a general model of fear of crime: Data from a national sample.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellair, P. E. (1997). Social interaction and community crime: Examining the importance of network structures.Criminology, 35, 677–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bursik, R. J., Jr.&, Grasmick, H. G. (1993).Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. San Francisco: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  5. Chiricos, T., Eschholz, S., & Gertz, M. (1997). Crime, news and fear of crime: Toward an identification of audience effects.Social Problems, 44, 342–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiricos, T., Hogan, M., & Gertz, M. (1997). Racial composition of neighborhood and fear of crime.Criminology, 35, 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooley, C. H. (1962).Social organization. New York: Schocken Books. (Original work published 1909).Google Scholar
  8. DeFronzo, J. (1996). Welfare and burglary.Crime and Delinquency, 42, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Defronzo, J. (1997). Welfare and homicide.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fried, M. (1982). Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillis, A. R. & Hagan, J. (1982). Density, delinquency, and design: Formal and informal control and the built environment.Criminology, 19, 514–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottfredson, D. C., McNeil, R. J., III, &, Gottfredson, G. D. (1991). Social area influences on delinquency: A multilevel analysis.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haggerty, L. J. (1982). Differential social contact in urban neighborhoods: Environmental vs. sociodemographic explanations.The Sociological Quarterly, 23, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heitgard, J. L., & Bursik, Jr., R. J. (1987). Extracommunity dynamics and the ecology of delinquency.American Journal of Sociology, 92, 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Houts, S., & Kassab, C. (1997). Rotter’s social learning theory and fear of crime: Differences by race and ethnicity.Social Science Quarterly, 78, 122–136.Google Scholar
  17. Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime.Social Forces, 75, 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavrakas, P. J., & Skogan, W. G. (1979).Citizen participation and community crime prevention, 1979: Chicago metropolitan area survey. Conducted by Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium of Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1997.Google Scholar
  19. Oliver, P. (1984). If you don’t do it, nobody else will.American Sociological Review, 49, 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rountree, P. W., Land, K. C., & Miethe, T. D. (1994). Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle.Criminology, 32, 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rountree, P. W., & Land, K. C. (1996). Burglary victimization, perceptions of crime risk, and routine activities.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rountree, P. W., & Land, K. C. (1996). Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data.Social Forces, 74, 1353–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sampson, R. J. (1988). Legal friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model.American Sociological Review, 53, 766–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structures and crime: Testing social disorganization theory.American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942).Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, W. R., & Torstensson, M. (1997). Fear of crime: Gender differences in risk perception and neutralizing fear of crime.British Journal of Criminology, 37, 608–634.Google Scholar
  27. St. John, C., & Heald-Moore, T. (1996). Age, racial prejudice and fear of criminal victimization in public settings.Sociological Focus, 29, 15–31.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, R. B., Shumaker, S. A., & Gottfredson, S. D. (1985). Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: Deterioration, fear of crime, and confidence.Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2, 261–275.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, R. B. (1995). The impact of crime on communities.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker, M. A. (1994). Measuring concern about crime: Some inter-racial comparisons.British Journal of Criminology, 34, 366–378.Google Scholar
  31. Warner, B. D., & Pierce, G. L. (1993). Reexamining social disorganization theory using calls to the police as a measure of crime.Criminology, 31, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warner, B. D., & Rountree, P. W. (1997). Local social ties in a community and crime model: Questioning the systemic nature of informal social control.Social Problems, 44, 520–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support.American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wittberg, P. (1984). The effects of local activity on neighborhood attitudes: A comparison of black and white urbanites.Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Woolever, C. (1992). A contextual approach to neighborhood attachment.Urban Studies, 29, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Delisi
    • 1
  • Bob Regoli
    • 2
  1. 1.Iowa State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations