Motives of reward among men who rape

  • Robert Hale


Perceptual deterrence research attempts to measure the effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment in preventing criminal behavior, while considering the rewards (from the perception of the offender) of committing the crime. Many studies in the area of perceptual deterrence are lacking any measure of reward, resulting in an incomplete model. This study will examine the goals of men who commit rape to better understand what compels the rapist. Respondents for this study were drawn from the population of rapists in the maximum security state penitentiaries located in two Southern states. All were surveyed concerning the rewards that would lead them to commit rape, while considering two levels of risk of apprehension. The results reveal that those who rape often have a specific motive in mind and have calculated the risks involved in committing the offense.


Criminal Behavior Choice Theory Counseling Session Deterrent Effect Sexual Aggression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abel, G. G., & Blanchard, E. B. (1974). The role of fantasy in the treatment of sexual deviation.Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 467–475.Google Scholar
  2. Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of general theory.American Sociological Review, 44, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akers, R. L. (1994).Criminological theories. Los Angeles: Roxbury Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bentham, J. (1948).An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. (L. J. Lafleur, Ed.). New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
  5. Beyleveld, D. (1980).A bibliography on general deterrence research. Farnborough, England: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  6. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control.American Sociological Review, 48, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgess, A. W. (Ed.) (1991).Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  8. Burgess, A. W., Hartman, C. R., Ressler, R. K., Douglas, J., & McCormack, A. (1986). Sexual homicide: A motivational model.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986).The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Decker, S., Wright, R., & Logie, R. (1992). Perceptual deterrence among active residential burglars: A research note.Criminology, 31, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deming, M. B., & Eppy, A. (1981). The sociology of rape.Sociology and Social Research, 64, 357–380.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, S. (1983). Sexuality, sexual offenses, and conception of victims in the criminal justice process.Victimology: An International Journal, 8, 113–128.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, L., & Hoffman, H. (Eds.). (1990).Crime in biological, social, and moral Contexts. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  14. Felson, R. B., & Krohn, M. (1990). Motives for rape.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(3), 222–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs, J. (1975).Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Grasmick, H., & Bursik, R. (1990). Conscience, significant others and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model.Law and Society Review, 24, 837–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grasmick, H. G., & Green, D. E. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval, and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, D. (1989). Past behavior as a measure of actual future behavior: An unresolved issue in perceptual deterrence research.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 80, 781–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groth, A. N., & Birnbaum, J. (1979).Men who rape. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harding, R. W. (1990). Rational-choice gun use in armed robbery: The likely deterrent effect on gun use of mandatory additional punishment.Criminal Law Forum, 1, 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herman, J. L. (1995). Considering sex offenders: A model of addiction. In P. Searles & R. Berger (Eds.),Rape and society (pp. 74–98). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  22. Holmes, R. (1991).Sex crimes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Holmes, R., DeBurger, J., & Holmes, S. T. (1988). Inside the mind of the serial murderer.American Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, J. (1988).Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Kimmel, M. (1996).Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and perceived punishment revisited.Criminology, 27, 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1987). The developmental antecedents and adult adaptations of rapist subtypes.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14(4), 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knopp, F. (1984).Retraining adult sex offenders: Methods and models. Syracuse, NY: Safe Society Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lanyon, R. I. (1986). Theory and treatment in child molestation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacCullough, M., Snowden, P., Wood, J., & Mills, H. (1983). Sadistic fantasy, sadistic behavior, and offending.British Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maletzky, B. (1991).Treating the sexual offender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Messner, M. (1989). When bodies are weapons: Masculinity and violence in sport.International Review of the Sociology of Sport, 25(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of perceived severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues.Justice Quarterly, 42, 173–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paternoster, R., Saltzman, L. E., Waldo, G. P., & Chiricos, T. G. (1983). Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter?Law and Society Review, 17, 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prentky, R. A., & Burgess, A. W. (1991). Hypothetical biological substrates of a fantasybased drive mechanism for repetitive sexual aggression. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.),Rape and sexual assault (pp. 235–256). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  36. Prentky, R. A., Cohen, M. L., & Seghorn, T. K. (1985). Development of a rational taxonomy for the classification of sexual offenders: Rapists.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 39–70.Google Scholar
  37. Quinsey, V. L. (1984). Sexual aggression: Studies of offenders against women. In D. Weisstub (Ed.),Law and mental health: International perspectives, (Vol. 1, pp. 84–121). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  38. Reiss, A. J., & Roth, J. A. (1993).Understanding and preventing violence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenfield, A. (1985, April). Sex offenders: Men who molest, treating the deviant.Psychology Today, 8–10.Google Scholar
  40. Russell, D. E. H. (1988). Pornography and rape: A causal model.Political Psychology, 9, 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Russell, D. E. H. (Ed.) (1989). Sexism, violence, and the nuclear mentality.Exposing nuclear phallocies (pp. 63–74). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  42. Russell, D. E. H. (1995). White man wants a black piece. In P. Searles & R. Berger (Eds.),Rape and society (pp. 129–138). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scully, D. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motives: Excuses and justifications.Social Problems, 31(5), 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scully, D. (1990).Understanding sexual violence: A study of convicted rapists. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  45. Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1985). Riding the bull at Gilley’s: Convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape.Social Problems, 32(3), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1995). Riding the bull at Gilley’s: Convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape. In P. Searles & R. Berger (Eds.),Rape and Society (pp. 58–73). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  47. Shields, W. M. & Shields, L. M. (1983). Forcible rape: An evolutionary perspective.Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Symons, D. (1979).The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989).Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  50. Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis.Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1987). Human rape: The strengths of the evolutionary perspective. In C. Crawford, M. Smith, & D. Krebs (Eds.),Sociobiology and psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 269–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Tunnell, K. (1990). Choosing crime: Close your eyes and take your chances.Justice Quarterly, 7, 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warren, J. I., Hazelwood, R. R., & Reboussin, R. (1991). Serial rape: The offender and his rape career. In A. Burgess (Ed.),Rape and sexual assault (pp. 275–311). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  54. Weiner, N. A., Zahn, M. A., & Sagi, R. J. (1990).Violence: Patterns, causes, and public policy. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  55. Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1989). The meaning of arrest for wife assault.Criminology, 27, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Hale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Social Work and Criminal JusticeSoutheastern Louisiana UniversityHammond

Personalised recommendations