Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designed to fail: Self-control and involvement in the criminal justice system

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates self-control theory using official and selfreported criminal records of 500 adult offenders. Four items derived from rapsheets (aliases, date of birth, place of birth, and social security number) are used as indicators of the self-control construct. Negative binomial regression models indicate a significant inverse relationship between self-control and escape arrests, failure to appear violations, probation and parole violations, felony convictions, and prison sentences. Since system involvement entails discipline, tenacity, and responsibility, offenders with low self-control are more likely to experience a criminal justice system failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, R. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneklev, B., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., & Bursik, R. J. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneklev, B., Cochran, J. K., & Gainey, R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s “low self-control” stability hypothesis: An exploratory study.American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartusch, D., Lynam, D., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. (1997). Is age important? Testing a general versus a developmental theory of antisocial behavior.Criminology, 35, 13–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. L., & Moore E. (1992). Are white collar and common offenders the same? An empirical and theoretical critique of a recently proposed general theory of crime.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 29, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, A. D., & Reiss, A. (1967). On exploring the “dark figure” of crime.The Annals, 374, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, T., & Lucken, K. (1994). Stacking the deck by piling up sanctions: Is intermediate punishment destined to fail?Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, C. (2000). Comment on Paternoster and Brame.Criminology, 38, 965–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, C., Gottfredson, M. R., & Goldkamp, J. S. (1992). Drug testing and pretrial misconduct: An experiment on the specific deterrent effects of drug monitoring defendants on pretrial release.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownfield, D., & Sorenson, A. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical issues and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory of crime.Deviant Behavior, 14, 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, V., Cullen, F., Evans, T., Fiftal-Alarid, L., & Dunaway, R. G. (1998). Gender, self-control, and crime.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 35, 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, V., Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Olivares, K., & Dunaway, R. G. (1999). Age, self-control, and adults’ offending behaviors: A research note assessing a general theory of crime.Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernkovich, S. A., Giordano, P. C., & Pugh, M. D. (1985). Chronic offenders: The missing cases in self-report delinquency research.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 76, 705–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J., Wood, P., Sellers, C., Wilkerson, W., & Chamlin, M. (1998). Academic dishonesty and low self-control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime.Deviant Behavior, 19, 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLisi, M. (in press). It’s all in the record: Assessing self-control theory with an offender sample.Criminal Justice Review.

  • Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Dunaway, R. G., & Benson, M. L. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime.Criminology, 35, 475–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forde, D., & Kennedy, L. (1997). Risk lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime.Justice Quarterly, 14, 265–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models.Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerken, M. R. (1994). Rap sheets in criminological research: Considerations and caveats.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. (2000). On the absence of self-control as the basis for a general theory of crime: A critique.Theoretical Criminology, 4, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J., & Giever, D. (1995). Self-control and its manifestations among university students: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory.Justice Quarterly, 12, 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J., Giever, D., & Martin, J. (1998). Parental management and self-control: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 35, 40–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. L., Wright, J. P., & Tibbetts, S. G. (2000). Empirical assessment of the generality of the general theory of crime: The effects of low self-control on social development.Journal of Crime & Justice, 23, 109–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1993). Judicial responsibility for pretrial release decisionmaking and the information role of pretrial services.Federal Probation, 57, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S., Gottfredson, M. R., & Weiland, D. (1990). Pretrial drug testing and defendant risk.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 81, 585–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990).A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Geerken, M. (1985). Are uniform crime reports a valid indicator of index crimes? An affirmative answer with minor qualifications.Criminology, 23, 451–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: A test of self-control theory.Criminology, 39, 707–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, C., Green, G., & Larragoite, V. (1998). Clarifying the reach of a general theory of crime for organizational offending: A comment on Reed and Yeager.Criminology, 36, 867–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981).Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (Eds.) (1994).The generality of deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (2000). In defense of self-control.Theoretical Criminology, 4, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. R., & Goldkamp, J. S. (1991). Judicial guidelines for pretrial release: Research and policy developments in the United States.Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 140–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger, M., & Tremblay, R. (1999). Self control, accidents, and crime.Criminal Justice & Behavior, 26, 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, C., Maxim, P., & Teevan, J. (1993). Drinking and driving, self control, and gender: Testing a general theory of crime.Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaGrange, T., & Silverman, R. (1999). Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency.Criminology, 37, 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longshore, D. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A prospective test of the general theory of crime.Social Problems, 45, 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A cross-sectional test of the general theory of crime.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucken, K. (1997). Dynamics of penal reform.Crime, Law, and Social Change, 26, 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, M. G., Weiler, B., & Widom, C. S. (2000). Comparing self-reports and official records of arrests.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. R. (1999). Examining the congruence between predictors of ROR and failures to appear.Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Burack, C. (1993). A critique of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: Selective (in)attention to gender and power positions.Women & Criminal Justice, 4, 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Krueger, R., Caspi, A., & Fagan, J. (2000). Partner abuse and general crime: How are they the same? How are they different?Criminology, 38, 199–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., & Brame, R. (1998). The structural similarity of processes generating criminal and analogous behaviors.Criminology, 36, 633–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., & Brame, R. (2000). On the association among self-control, crime, and analogous behaviors.Criminology, 38, 971–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions.Prison Journal, 74, 306–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A., & Tibbetts, S. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending.Justice Quarterly, 13, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A., Macintosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale.Criminology, 38, 897–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polakowski, M. (1994). Linking self- and social control with deviance: Illuminating the structure underlying a general theory of crime and its relation to deviant activity.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 41–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G., & Yeager, P. (1996). Organizational offending and neoclassical criminology: Challenging the reach of a general theory of crime.Criminology, 34, 357–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, C. (1999). Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime.Justice Quarterly, 16, 633–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, C. (1999). Self-control and intimate violence: An examination of the scope and specification of the general theory of crime.Criminology, 37, 375–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, A., & Brownfield, D. (1995). Adolescent drug use and a general theory of crime: An analysis of a theoretical integration.Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. (1989). On the causes of “white collar” crime: An assessment of Hirschi and Gottfredson’s claims.Criminology, 27, 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2001). The relationship between social and self-control: Tracing Hirschi’s criminological career.Theoretical Criminology, 5, 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R. (1991). Review.American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1609–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk, J. A., Benson, M. L., & Harris, D. K. (2000). Test of strain and self-control theories: Occupational crime in nursing homes.Journal of Crime & Justice, 23, 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, R. (2000). Is self-control sufficient? Toward a more general theory of crime. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, California.

  • Wood, P. B., & Grasmick, H. G. (1999). Toward the development of punishment equivalencies: Male and female inmates rate the severity of alternative sanctions compared to prison.Justice Quarterly, 16, 19–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. (1999). Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: Social causation, social selection, or both?Criminology, 37, 479–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, P., & Reed, C. (1998). Of corporate persons and straw men: A reply to Herbert, Green, and Larragoite.Criminology, 36, 885–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, 203A East Hall, 50011-1070, Ames, IO

    Matt Delisi

Authors
  1. Matt Delisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Delisi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delisi, M. Designed to fail: Self-control and involvement in the criminal justice system. Am J Crim Just 26, 131–148 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886862

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886862

Keywords

Search

Navigation