Role-played interpersonal interaction: Ecological validity and cardiovascular reactivity
- 131 Downloads
Conflictual role-play scenarios have been used to model brief interpersonal interaction and to elicit cardiovascular reactivity in the laboratory. Here we discuss data suggesting that role-played interactions constitute an ecologically valid laboratory task that may improve laboratory-to-field generalization of cardiovascular response. Specifically, our research indicates that young adults perceive the stress associated with role-play scenarios as similar to that encountered in everyday life. Furthermore, these stress appraisals moderate cardiovascular response to role-play in men. We also find that a social stressor (i.e. speech task) is perceived as significantly more similar to a real-life stressor as compared to other standard laboratory tasks. We propose that particular constellations of cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses to laboratory-based social stressors, such as role-played interaction, may elicit different patterns of hemodynamic response. Further understanding of interrelations among cognitive, affective, behavioral, and physiological response patterns may assist in the study of cardiovascular reactivity as a potential mechanism linking personality factors and the development of cardiovascular disease.
KeywordsBehavioral Medicine Cardiovascular Response Cardiovascular Reactivity Daily Hassle Threat Appraisal
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- (5).Manuck SB, Kamarck TW, Kasprowicz AL Waldstein SR: Stability and patterning of behaviorally evoked cardiovascular reactivity. In Blascovich J, Katkin ES (eds),Cardiovascular Reactivity to Psychological Stress and Disease. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1993, 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (6).Turner JR, Ward MM, Gellman MD, et al: The relationship between laboratory and ambulatory cardiovascular activity: Current evidence and future directions.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,16:12–23.Google Scholar
- (10).Smith TW: Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis.Health Psychology. 1992,11:130–150.Google Scholar
- (11).Manuck SB, Morrison RL, Bellack AS, Polefrone JM: Behavioral factors in hypertension: Cardiovascular responsivity, anger, and social competence. In Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1985, 149–172.Google Scholar
- (18).Waldstein SR, Polefrone JM, Morrison RL, Bellack AS, Manuck SB: Social competence, parental history of hypertension, and cardiovascular reactivity.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57:94.Google Scholar
- (25).Lazarus RS, Folkman S:Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.Google Scholar
- (26).Lazarus RS:Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
- (28).Krantz DS, Ratliff-Crain J: The social context of stress and behavioral medicine research. Instructions, experimenter effects, and social interactions. In Schneiderman N, Weiss SM, Kaufmann PG (eds).Handbook of Research Methods in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine. New York: Plenum, 1989, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar