Abstract
The present study confirms the stratigraphical position of microtektite layer being clearly located below the Brunhes/Matuyama (BIM) boundary. Based on the sedimentation rate derived from the stable isotopic and magnetic data of ODP Site 772A, cores 17957 and 17959 in the South China Sea, the age of the mid-Pleistocene impact event was estimated at 1–12 ka earlier than the Brunhes-Matuyama polarity reversal. However, the microtektites were found above the measured BIM boundary in the loess profile due to the downward deviation of the measured B/M boundary from its true position[1]. This demonstrates the complexity of paleo-magnetic records in the loess profiles which, in turn, causes the confusion in the sea-land stratigraphic correlation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhou, L. P., Shackleton, N. J., Misleading position of geomagnetic reversal boundaries in Eurasian loess and implications for correlation between continental and marine sedimentary sequences, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1999, 168: 117.
Ouyang Ziyuan el al., Impact of Asteroid & Paleoenvironmental Catastrophe—Study on Six Cenozoic Bolide-impact Events (in Chinese), Hubei Sci. & Tech. Publ., 1997, 1–170.
Yuan Baoyin, Preliminary discussion on the origin of Lei-Gong-Mo (tektites), Sci. Geologica Sinica (in Chinese), 1981, 4: 229.
Zhang Hunan, Chen Weiguang, Li Ziquan et al., Discovery of tektite in west Guangdong and its sense for determination of the age, Mar. Geol. & Quat. Geol. (in Chinese), 1991, 11(4): 101.
Li Chunlai, Ouyang Ziyuan, Liu Tungsheng et al., Microtektites and glassy micmspherules in loes—their discoverries and implications, Sci. in China, Ser. B, 1993, 36: 1141.
Xu Heling, Wu Xihao, Deng Jiwen et al., Discoveries of the unusual micrograins in the loess strata and their preliminary studies, Mar. Geol. & Quat. Geol. (in Chinese), 1993, 13(3): 57.
Zhao Quanhong, Jian Zhumin, Li Baohua et al., Microtektites in the middle Pleistocene deep-sea sediments of the South China Sea, Science in China. Ser. D, 1999, 42(5): 531.
Smit, J., van Eijden, A. J. M., Troelstra, S. R., Analysis of the Australasian microtaktite event, the Toba event, and the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary, eastern Indian Ocean. Proc. ODP Sci. Res., 1991. 121: 489.
Schneider, D. A., Kent, D. V., Mello, G. A., A detailed chronology of the Autralasian impact event, the Brunhes-Matuyama geomagnetic polarity reversal, and global climate change. Earth and Planetary Science Letter, 1992, 111: 395.
Harding, B. W., Storms, M. A. et al., Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, 1990, 124: 75.
Sarnthein, M., Plaumann, U., Wang, P. et al., Preliminary report on Sonne-95 cruse “monitor monsoon” to the South China Sea, Ber.-Rep., Geol.-Paleont. Inst. Univ. Kiel, Germany, 1994, 68, 255.
Berger, W. H., Bicken, T., Wefer, G. et al., Brunhes-Matuyama boundary: 790 ky date consistent with ODP Leg 130 oxygen isotope records based on tit to Milankovitch, Geophysical Research Letters, 1995, 22(12): 1525.
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. A., Swisher III, C. C. et al., A review Cenozoic geochmnology and chronostratigraphy, Geochronology, Time Scale and Global Stratigraphic Correlation (eds. Berggren, W. A. et al.), Spec. Publ. Soc. Econ. Palrontol. Mineral., 1995, 54:129.
Jian, Z., Wang, P., Chen, M. P. et al., Foraminifera1 response to major Pleistocene paleoceanographic changes in the southern China Sea, Paleoceanography, 2000, 15(2): 229.
Peirce, J., Weissel, J., Taylor, E. et al., Broken Ridge and Ninetyeast Ridge, Proc. ODP, 1991, 121: 869.
Kukla, G., An, Z. S., Loess stratigraphy in central China, Palaeogeog, Palaeoclimat, Palaeoecol., 1989, 72: 203.
Ding, Z. L., Yu, Z. W., Rutter, N. W. et al., Towards an orbital time scale for Chinese loesse deposits, Quaternary Science Reviews, 1994, 13: 39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Zhao, Q., Cheng, X. et al. Age estimation of the mid-Pleistocene microtektite event in the South China Sea: A case showing the complexity of the sea-land correlation. Chin. Sci. Bull. 45, 2277–2280 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886368
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886368