Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 235–243 | Cite as

The influence of gender and emotional versus instrumental support on cardiovascular reactivity in African-American adolescents

  • Dawn K. Wilson
  • Wendy Kliewer
  • Laura Bayer
  • Deion Jones
  • Ayn Welleford
  • Michele Heiney
  • Domenic A. Sica


Research suggests that females seek out, prefer, and are more receptive to emotional support (encouragement), and that males seek out, prefer, and are more receptive to instrumental support (problem-solving). Thus, we hypothesized that boys would show lower blood pressure (BP) reactivity in response to instrumental than emotional or no support, and that girls would show lower BP reactivity in response to emotional than instrumental or no support. Forty-eight healthy African-American adolescents (50% males) participated in a role play conflict task and were randomized to receive either emotional, instrumental, or no support (presence only) from a confederate. Boys showed lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) reactivity in the instrumental than in the emotional or no support conditions and lower recovery SBP as compared to boys in the emotional or no support conditions. A similar pattern of results was demonstrated for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reactivity. Girls, however, did not demonstrate lower BP reactivity in response to emotional as compared to instrumental support. These findings suggest that instrumental and emotional support differentially influence cardiovascular (CV) reactivity in African-American boys versus girls.


Social Support Emotional Support Behavioral Medicine Instrumental Support Cardiovascular Reactivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Berkman LF, Syme SL: Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up of Alameda County residents.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1979,109:186–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    House JS, Robbins C, Metzner HL: The association of social relationships and activities to mortality: Prospective evidence from Tecumseh Community Health Study.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1982,116:123–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Orth-Gomer K, Johnson JV: Social network interaction and mortality: A six-year follow-up of the Swedish population.Journal of Chronic Disease. 1987,40:949–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Orth-Gomer K, Unden AL: Type A behavior, social support, and coronary risk: Interaction and significance for mortality in cardiac patients.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1990,52:59–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Schoenbach VJ, Kaplan BH, Fredman L, Kleinbaum DG: Social ties and mortality in Evans County, Goergia.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986,123:577–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Welin L, Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Tibblin B, Tibblin G: Social network and activities in relation to mortality from cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and other causes: A 12-year follow-up of the Study of Men Born in 1913 and 1923.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1992,46:127–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz RE: Emotional support and survival following myocardial infarction: A prospective, population-based study of the elderly.Annals of Internal Medicine. 1992,117:1003–1009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Case RB, Moss AJ, Case N, et al: Living alone after myocardial infarction: Impact on prognosis.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992,267:515–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Ruberman W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg JD, et al: Psychosocial influences on mortality after myocardial infarction.New England Journal of Medicine. 1984,311:552–559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Williams RB, Barefoot JC, Califf RM, et al: Prognostic importance of social and economic resources among medically treated patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992,267:520–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Orth-Gomer K, Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L: Lack of social support and incidence of coronary heart disease in middle-aged Swedish men.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993,55:37–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Borghi C, Costa FV, Boschi S, Mussi A, Ambrosioni E: Predictors of stable hypertension in young borderline subjects: A five-year follow-up study.Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 1986,8:S138-S141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Falkner B, Kushner H, Onesti G, Angelakos ET: Cardiovascular characteristics in adolescents who develop essential hypertension.Hypertension. 1981,3:521–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Alpert BS, Wilson DK: Stress reactivity in childhood and adolescence. In Turner JR, Sherwood A, Light K (eds),Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Response to Stress: Applications to Models of Cardiovascular Disease. New York: Plenum, Inc., 1992, 187–201.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Murphy JK, Stoney CM, Alpert BS, Walker SS: Gender and ethnicity in children’s cardiovascular reactivity: 7 years of study.Health Psychology. 1995,14:48–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Wright LB, Treiber FA, Davis H, Strong WB: Relationship between family environment and children’s hemodynamic responses to stress: A longitudinal evaluation.Behavioral Medicine. 1993,19: 115–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Cohen S: Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease.Health Psychology. 1988,7:269–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Gerin W, Pieper C, Levy R, Pickering TG: Social support in social interaction: A moderator of cardiovascular reactivity.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1992,54:324–336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Kamarck TW, Manuck SB, Jennings JR: Social support reduces cardiovascular reactivity to psychological challenge: A laboratory model.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1990,52:42–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Barrera M: Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1986,14:413–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Cohen S, Syme SL (eds):Social Support and Health. New York: Academic, 1985.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Berkman LF, Vaccarino V, Seeman T: Gender differences in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: The contribution of social networks and support.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1992,15:112–118.Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    Helgeson VS, Cohen S: Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research.Health Psychology. 1996,15:135–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Belle D: Gender differences in childrem’s social networks and supports. In Belle D (ed),Children’s Social Networks and Social Supports, New York: Wiley, 1989, 173–188.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Shumaker SA, Hill DR: Gender differences in social support and physical health.Health Psychology. 1991,10:102–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Kliewer W, Lepore SJ, Broquet A, Zuba L: Developmental and gender differences in anonymous support-seeking: Analysis of data from a community help line for children.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1990,18:333–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Bryant B: The neighborhood walk: Sources of support in middle childhood.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1985,50(3, Serial No. 210).Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK: Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989,56:267–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Nadler A: Help-seeking behavior: Psychological costs and instrumental benefits. In Clark M (ed),Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 12). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991, 290–311.Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    Mark EW, Alper TG: Women, men, and intimacy motivation.Psychology Women Quarterly. 1985,9:81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Belle D: Gender differences in the social moderators of stress. In Barnett RC, Biener L, Baruch GK (eds),Gender and Stress. New York: The Free Press, 1987, 257–277.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Gerin W, Milner D, Chawla S, Pickering TG: Social support as a moderator of cardiovascular reactivity in women: A test of the direct effects and buffering hypotheses.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57:16–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Kamarck TW, Annunziato B, Amateau LM: Affiliation moderates the effects of social threat on stress-related cardiovascular responses: Boundary conditions for a laboratory model of social support.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57:183–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Allen KM, Blascovich J, Tomaka J, Kelsey RM: Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991,61:582–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Edens JL, Larkin KT, Abel JL: The effect of social support and physical touch on cardiovascular reactions to mental stress.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1992,36:371–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Sheffield D, Carroll D: Social support and cardiovascular reactions to active laboratory stressors.Psychology and Health. 1994,9:305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Lepore SJ, Allen KA, Evans GW: Social support lowers cardiovascular reactivity to an acute stressor.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993,55:518–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Wilson DK, Kliewer W, Bayer L: Cardiovascular reactivity in Black adolescents: Influences of gender and emotional social support.Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health. 1993,1:37–50.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Linden W, Chambers L, Maurice J, Lenz JW: Sex differences in social support, self-deception, hostility, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity.Health Psychology. 1993,12:376–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Falkner B, Onesti G, Angelakos ET, Frenandes M, Langman C: Cardiovascular response to mental stress in normal adolescents with hypertensive parents.Hypertension. 1979,1:23–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Murphy JK, Alpert BS, Walker SS, Willey ES: Race and cardiovascular reactivity.Hypertension. 1988,11:308–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Update on the 1987 Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: A working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program.Pediatrics. 1996,98:649–658.Google Scholar
  43. (43).
    Hardy JD, Smith TW: Cynical hostility and vulnerability to disease: Social support, life stress, and physiological response to conflict.Health Psychology. 1988,7:447–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Arlett C, Best JA, Little BR: The influence of interviewer selfdisclosure and verbal reinforcement on personality tests.Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1976,32:770–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Trobst KK, Collins RL, Embree JM: The role of emotion in social support provision: Gender, empathy, and expressions of distress.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1994,11:45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Shell RM, Eisenberg N: Children’s reactions to the receipt of direct and indirect help.Child Development. 1996,67:1391–1405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. (47).
    Martinez P, Richters JE: The NIMH Community Violence Project: II. Children’s distress symptoms associated with violence exposure.Psychiatry. 1993,56:22–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. (48).
    Depner CE, Ingersoll-Dayton G: Supportive relationships in later life.Psychology and Aging. 1988,3:348–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    Flaherty J, Richman J: Gender differences in perception and utilization of social support: Theoretical perspectives and an empirical test.Social Science and Medicine. 1989,28:1221–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. (50).
    Vaux A:Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention. New York: Praeger, 1988.Google Scholar
  51. (51).
    Copeland EP, Hess RS: Differences in young adolescents’ coping strategies based on gender and ethnicity.Journal of Early Adolescence. 1995,15:203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. (52).
    Rook KS, Pietromonaco P: Close relationships: Ties that heal or ties that bind? In Jones WH, Perlman D (eds),Advances in Personal Relationships (Vol. 1), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987, 1–35.Google Scholar
  53. (53).
    Block JH: Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures.Child Development. 1983,54:1335–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Brehm JW:A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  55. (55).
    Staub E: The use of role playing and induction in children’s learning of helping and sharing behavior.Child Development. 1971,42: 805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. (56).
    Brown PC, Smith TW: Social influence, marriage, and the heart: Cardiovascular consequences of interpersonal control in husbands and wives.Health Psychology. 1992,11:88–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. (57).
    Smith TW, Limon JP, Gallo LC, Ngu LQ: Interpersonal control and cardiovascular reactivity: Goals, behavioral expression, and the moderating effects of sex.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996,70:1012–1024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. (58).
    Woods NF, Earp JL: Women with cured breast cancer: A study of mastectomy patients in North Carolina.Nursing Research. 1978,27:279–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. (59).
    Seeman TE, Berkman LF, Blazer D, Rowe JW: Social ties and support and neuroendocrine function: The MacArthur studies of successful aging.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,16:95–106.Google Scholar
  60. (60).
    Ewart CK, Taylor CB, Kraemer HC, Stewart AW: High blood pressure and marital discord: Not being nasty matters more than being nice.Health Psychology. 1991,10:155–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawn K. Wilson
    • 1
  • Wendy Kliewer
    • 1
  • Laura Bayer
    • 1
  • Deion Jones
    • 1
  • Ayn Welleford
    • 1
  • Michele Heiney
    • 1
  • Domenic A. Sica
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and HypertensionMedical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwelath UniversityRichmond

Personalised recommendations