Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 70–76 | Cite as

Contribution of behavior therapy and biofeedback to laxative therapy in the treatment of pediatric encopresis

  • Daniel J. Cox
  • James Sutphen
  • Steve Borowitz
  • Boris Kovatchev
  • William Ling


A model incorporating physiological, behavioral, and psychological parameters are presented to explain the maintenance and consequences of pediatric encopresis. It was hypothesized that the more comprehensive a treatment in addressing these parameters, the more efficacious it would be and the more children it would benefit. Eighty-seven children between the ages of 6 and 15 with the primary complaint of encopresis were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: (a) Intensive Medical Care (IMC), receiving enemas for disimpaction and laxatives to promote frequent bowel movements; (b) Enhanced Toilet Training (ETT), using reinforcement and scheduling to promote response to defecation urges and instruction and modeling to promote appropriate straining, along with laxatives and enemas; or (c) Biofeedback (BF), directed at relaxing the external anal sphincter during attempted defecation, along with toilet training, laxatives, and enemas. Three months following initiation of treatment, ETT and BF produced similar reductions in soiling/child (76% and 65%) that were superior (p's<.04) to IMC (21%). ETT significantly benefited more children than the other two treatments, employing fewer laxatives and fewer treatment sessions at a lower cost. Consistent with the presented model, reduction in soiling was associated with an increase in bowel movements in the toilet, reduction in parental prompting to use the toilet, and defecation pain. These results demonstrate that ETT should be used routinely with laxative therapy in the treatment of chronic encopresis.


Bowel Movement Behavioral Medicine External Anal Sphincter Chronic Constipation Toilet Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    American Psychiatric Association:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Bellman M: Studies on encopresis.Acta Paediatrica Scandinavia. 1996,56(Suppl. 170):1–151.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Loening-Baucke V: Modulation of abnormal defecation dynamics by biofeedback treatment in chronically constipated children with encopresis.Journal of Pediatrics. 1990,116:214–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Nolan T, Debelle G, Oberklaid F, Coffey C: Randomized trial of laxatives in treatment of childhood encopresis.Lancet. 1991,338:523–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Berg I, Forsythe I, Holt P, Watts J: A controlled trial of ‘Senokot’ in fecal soiling treated by behavioral methods.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1982,24:543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Davis H, Mitchell WS, Marks F: A behavioral programme for the modification of encopresis.Child: Care, Health and Development. 1976,2:273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Wright L: Outcome of a standardized program for treating psychogenic encopresis.Professional Psychology. 1975,6:453–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Bornstein P, Balleweg B, McLellarn R, et al: The bathroom game: A systematic program for the elimination of encopretic behavior.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1983,14:67–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Lowery SP, Srour JW, Whitehead WE, Schuster MM: Habit training as treatment of encopresis secondary to chronic constipation.Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 1985,4:397–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Borowitz SM, Sutphen JL, Ling WD, Cox DJ: Correlation of anorectal manometry with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis.Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1996,39:400–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Keren S, Wagner Y, Heldenburg D, Golan M: Studies of manometric abnormalities of the recto-anal region during defecation in constipated and soiling children: Modification through biofeedback therapy.American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1988,83:827–831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Meunier P, Merechal JM, Jaubert de Beaujeu M: Rectoanal pressures and rectal sensitivity studies in chronic childhood constipation.Gastroenterology. 1979,77:330–336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Sutphen JL, Borowitz SM, Ling WD, Cox DJ, Kovatchev B: Anorectal manometric examination does not predict response to therapy for retentive or non-retentive encopretic-constipated children.Gastroenterology. 1998,114:909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Sutphen JL, Borowitz SM, Ling WD, Cox DJ, Kovatchev B: Anorectal manometric examination in encopretic-constipated children.Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1997,40:1051–1055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Bleijenberg G, Kuipers HC: Biofeedback treatment of constipation: A comparison of two methods.American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1994,89:1021–1026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Cox DJ, Sutphen J, Dickerson M, Singles J, Whitehead WE: Simple electromyographic biofeedback treatment for chronic pediatric constipation/encopresis: Preliminary report.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation. 1994,19(1):41–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Cox DJ, Sutphen JL, Ling WD, Quillian W, Borowitz SM: Relative efficacy of laxative toilet-training and biofeedback therapies in the treatment of pediatric encopresis.Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 1996,21(5):659–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Ling W, Cox DJ, Sutphen JI, Borowitz SM: Psychological factors do not differentiate children with encopresis.Clinical Pediatrics. 1996,35:427–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Cox DJ, Ling WD, Sutphen JI, Borowitz SM: Differential treatment efficacy for pediatric encopresis. International Society of Behavior Medicine. Washington, DC: 1996.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Olness K, McParland F, Piper J: Biofeedback: A new modality in the management of children with fecal soiling.Journal of Pediatrics. 1980,96:505–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Singles JM, Mikulka PJ, Cox DJ, Mittal R: An alternative biofeedback-based behavior modification treatment for a case of chronic constipation.Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1992,23(3):231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Wald A, Chandra R, Gabel S, Chiponis D: Evaluation of biofeedback in childhood encopresis.Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 1987,6:554–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Weber J, Ducrotte PH, Touchais JY, Roussignol C, Denis PH: Biofeedback training for constipation in adults and children.Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1987,30:844–846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Cox DJ, Ballenger JC, Laraia M, et al: Different rates of improvement of different symptoms in combined pharmacological and behavioral treatment of agoraphobia.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1988,19(2):119–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Loening-Baucke V: Chronic constipation in children.Gastroenterology. 1993,34:1557–1564.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Pilapil VR: A horrifying television commercial that led to constipation.Pediatrics. 1990,85(4):592–593.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Cox
    • 1
  • James Sutphen
    • 1
  • Steve Borowitz
    • 1
  • Boris Kovatchev
    • 1
  • William Ling
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral Medicine CenterUniversity of Virginia Health Sciences CenterCharlottesville

Personalised recommendations