Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 146–150 | Cite as

Relationship of John Henryism to cardiovascular functioning at rest and during stress in youth

  • Lynda Brown Wright
  • Frank A. Treiber
  • Harry Davis
  • William B. Strong
Empirical Research


John Henryism, a coping style characterized by a strong predisposition to confront daily psychosocial stressors in an active and effortful manner, has been associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease risk in adults. This study examined the relationship of John Henryism to CV functioning at rest and during laboratory stressors (i.e. forehead cold stimulation, postural change, and treadmill exercise) in 173 normotensive 10-to 17-year-old African-American and White children. High John Henry scores were associated with higher blood pressure, higher total peripheral resistance, and lower cardiac index at rest. These relationships were qualified by an interaction with socioeconomic status (SES) such that those from lower SES backgrounds who were high on John Henryism had particularly high levels of resting CV measures. No significant associations were observed with CV reactivity to the stressors. Findings are discussed in terms of possible impact of coping styles to environmental stress upon physiological functioning and health.


Cardiac Index Coping Style Behavioral Medicine Total Peripheral Resistance Rest Blood Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Friedman HS (ed):Hostility, Coping, and Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds):Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    James SA, Strogatz DS, Wing SB, Ramsey DL: Socioeconomic status, John Henryism, and hypertension in Blacks and Whites.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1987,126: 664–673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    James SA, Hartnett SA, Kalsbeek WD: John Henryism and blood pressure differences among Black men.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1983,6: 259–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    James SA, LaCroix AZ, Kleinbaum DG, Strogatz DA: John Henryism and blood pressure differences among Black men. II. The role of occupational stressors.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1984,7: 259–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    James SA, Keenan NL, Strogatz DS, Browning SR, Garrett JM: Socioeconomic status, John Henryism, and blood pressure in Black adults.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1992,135: 59–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Weinrich SP, Weinrich MC, Keil JE, Gazes PC, Potter E: The John Henryism and Framingham Type A scales.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1988,128: 165–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Wiist WH, Flack JM: A test of the John Henryism hypothesis: Cholesterol and blood pressure.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1992,15: 15–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Duijkers TJ, Drijver M, Kromhout D, James SA: “John Henryism” and blood pressure in a Dutch population.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1988,50: 353–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    James SA: John Henryism and the health of African-Americans.Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 1994,18: 163–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Anderson NB, McNeilly M, Myers H: Toward understanding race differences in autonomic reactivity: A proposed contextual model. In Turner JR, Sherwood A, Light KC (eds),Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Response to Stress. New York: Plenum Press, 1992, 125–145.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Manuck SB, Kasprowicz AL, Muldoon MF: Behaviorally-evoked cardiovascular reactivity and hypertension: Conceptual issues and potential associations.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1990,12: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Dysart JM, Treiber FA, Pflieger K, Davis H, Strong WB: Ethnic differences in the myocardial and vascular reactivity to stress in normotensive girls.American Journal of Hypertension. 1994,7: 15–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Treiber F, Raunikar RA, Davis H, et al: One-year stability and prediction of cardiovascular functioning at rest and during laboratory stressors in youth with family histories of essential hypertension.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,1: 335–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Jackson AS, Squires WG, Grimes G, Beard EF: Prediction of future resting hypertension from exercise blood pressure.Journal of Cardiac Rehabilitation. 1988,3: 263–268.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Sparrow D, Rosner B, Vokonas PS, Weiss ST: Relation of blood pressure measured in several positions to the subsequent development of systemic hypertension: The Normative Aging Study.American Journal of Cardiology. 1986,57: 218–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Menkes MS, Matthews KA, Krantz DS, et al: Cardiovascular reactivity to the cold pressor test as a predictor of hypertension.Hypertension. 1989,14: 524–530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Shoemaker A: Construct validity of area specific self-esteem: The Hare Self-Esteem Scale.,Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1980,40: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Hunter SM, Wolf TF, Sklov MC, et al: Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and cardiovascular risk factor variables in children and adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study.Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1982,35: 613–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Spielberger CD, Johnson EH, Russell SF, et al: The experience and expression of anger: Construction and validation of an anger expression scale. In Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1985, 5–30.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Braden DS, Leatherbury L, Treiber FA, Strong WB: Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output in children using impedance cardiography.American Heart Journal. 1990,120: 1166–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Mattar JA, Baruzzi A, Diament D, et al: A clinical comparison between cardiac output measured by thermodilution versus non-invasive thoracic electrical bioimpedance.Acute Care. 1986,12: 58–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Park MK, Menard SM: Accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Dinamap monitor in infants and children.Pediatrics. 1987,79: 907–914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Rosner BA, Appel LJ, Raczynski JM, et al: A comparison of two automated monitors in the measurements of blood pressure reactivity.Annals of Epidemiology. 1990,1: 57–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Treiber FA, McCaffrey F, Strong WB, Davis H, Baranowski T: Automated exercise blood pressure measurements in children: A preliminary study.Pediatric Exercise Science. 1991,3: 290–299.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Cumming GR, Everett D, Hastman L: Bruce Treadmill in children: Normal values in a clinic population.American Journal of Cardiology. 1978,41: 69–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Lund-Johansen P: Hemodynamic alterations in early essential hypertension: Recent advances. In Gross F, Strasser T (eds),Mild Hypertension: Recent Advances. New York: Raven Press, 1983, 237–249.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Finch AJ, Rogers FR: Self-report instruments. In Ollendick TJ, Hersen M (eds).Child Behavior Assessment: Principles and Procedures. New York: Pergamon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Platt R: The influence of heredity. In Stamler J, Stamler R, Pullman TN (eds),The Epidemiology of Hypertension. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1967, 9–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynda Brown Wright
    • 2
  • Frank A. Treiber
    • 1
  • Harry Davis
    • 1
  • William B. Strong
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical College of GeorgiaUSA
  2. 2.University of KentuckyLexington

Personalised recommendations