Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship of John Henryism to cardiovascular functioning at rest and during stress in youth

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

John Henryism, a coping style characterized by a strong predisposition to confront daily psychosocial stressors in an active and effortful manner, has been associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease risk in adults. This study examined the relationship of John Henryism to CV functioning at rest and during laboratory stressors (i.e. forehead cold stimulation, postural change, and treadmill exercise) in 173 normotensive 10-to 17-year-old African-American and White children. High John Henry scores were associated with higher blood pressure, higher total peripheral resistance, and lower cardiac index at rest. These relationships were qualified by an interaction with socioeconomic status (SES) such that those from lower SES backgrounds who were high on John Henryism had particularly high levels of resting CV measures. No significant associations were observed with CV reactivity to the stressors. Findings are discussed in terms of possible impact of coping styles to environmental stress upon physiological functioning and health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman HS (ed):Hostility, Coping, and Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds):Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James SA, Strogatz DS, Wing SB, Ramsey DL: Socioeconomic status, John Henryism, and hypertension in Blacks and Whites.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1987,126: 664–673.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. James SA, Hartnett SA, Kalsbeek WD: John Henryism and blood pressure differences among Black men.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1983,6: 259–278.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. James SA, LaCroix AZ, Kleinbaum DG, Strogatz DA: John Henryism and blood pressure differences among Black men. II. The role of occupational stressors.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1984,7: 259–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. James SA, Keenan NL, Strogatz DS, Browning SR, Garrett JM: Socioeconomic status, John Henryism, and blood pressure in Black adults.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1992,135: 59–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinrich SP, Weinrich MC, Keil JE, Gazes PC, Potter E: The John Henryism and Framingham Type A scales.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1988,128: 165–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiist WH, Flack JM: A test of the John Henryism hypothesis: Cholesterol and blood pressure.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1992,15: 15–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Duijkers TJ, Drijver M, Kromhout D, James SA: “John Henryism” and blood pressure in a Dutch population.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1988,50: 353–359.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. James SA: John Henryism and the health of African-Americans.Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 1994,18: 163–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson NB, McNeilly M, Myers H: Toward understanding race differences in autonomic reactivity: A proposed contextual model. In Turner JR, Sherwood A, Light KC (eds),Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Response to Stress. New York: Plenum Press, 1992, 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manuck SB, Kasprowicz AL, Muldoon MF: Behaviorally-evoked cardiovascular reactivity and hypertension: Conceptual issues and potential associations.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1990,12: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dysart JM, Treiber FA, Pflieger K, Davis H, Strong WB: Ethnic differences in the myocardial and vascular reactivity to stress in normotensive girls.American Journal of Hypertension. 1994,7: 15–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Treiber F, Raunikar RA, Davis H, et al: One-year stability and prediction of cardiovascular functioning at rest and during laboratory stressors in youth with family histories of essential hypertension.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,1: 335–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson AS, Squires WG, Grimes G, Beard EF: Prediction of future resting hypertension from exercise blood pressure.Journal of Cardiac Rehabilitation. 1988,3: 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sparrow D, Rosner B, Vokonas PS, Weiss ST: Relation of blood pressure measured in several positions to the subsequent development of systemic hypertension: The Normative Aging Study.American Journal of Cardiology. 1986,57: 218–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Menkes MS, Matthews KA, Krantz DS, et al: Cardiovascular reactivity to the cold pressor test as a predictor of hypertension.Hypertension. 1989,14: 524–530.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shoemaker A: Construct validity of area specific self-esteem: The Hare Self-Esteem Scale.,Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1980,40: 495–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunter SM, Wolf TF, Sklov MC, et al: Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and cardiovascular risk factor variables in children and adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study.Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1982,35: 613–621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Spielberger CD, Johnson EH, Russell SF, et al: The experience and expression of anger: Construction and validation of an anger expression scale. In Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1985, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Braden DS, Leatherbury L, Treiber FA, Strong WB: Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output in children using impedance cardiography.American Heart Journal. 1990,120: 1166–1172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mattar JA, Baruzzi A, Diament D, et al: A clinical comparison between cardiac output measured by thermodilution versus non-invasive thoracic electrical bioimpedance.Acute Care. 1986,12: 58–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park MK, Menard SM: Accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Dinamap monitor in infants and children.Pediatrics. 1987,79: 907–914.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosner BA, Appel LJ, Raczynski JM, et al: A comparison of two automated monitors in the measurements of blood pressure reactivity.Annals of Epidemiology. 1990,1: 57–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Treiber FA, McCaffrey F, Strong WB, Davis H, Baranowski T: Automated exercise blood pressure measurements in children: A preliminary study.Pediatric Exercise Science. 1991,3: 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cumming GR, Everett D, Hastman L: Bruce Treadmill in children: Normal values in a clinic population.American Journal of Cardiology. 1978,41: 69–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lund-Johansen P: Hemodynamic alterations in early essential hypertension: Recent advances. In Gross F, Strasser T (eds),Mild Hypertension: Recent Advances. New York: Raven Press, 1983, 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Finch AJ, Rogers FR: Self-report instruments. In Ollendick TJ, Hersen M (eds).Child Behavior Assessment: Principles and Procedures. New York: Pergamon Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Platt R: The influence of heredity. In Stamler J, Stamler R, Pullman TN (eds),The Epidemiology of Hypertension. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1967, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL35073 and HL41781) including a Minority Supplement Award to Dr. Wright on HL35073.

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, L.B., Treiber, F.A., Davis, H. et al. Relationship of John Henryism to cardiovascular functioning at rest and during stress in youth. Ann Behav Med 18, 146–150 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883390

Keywords

Navigation