Advertisement

American Potato Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 39–43 | Cite as

Field resistance to leafroll infection in potato varieties

  • Seth Barton Locke
Article

Summary

In recent years the leafroll disease of potatoes has become a major problem in the production of potatoes for seed and table stock in Washington. In order to find a substitute for the very susceptible variety, Netted Gem, variety tests were undertaken at three representative locations in the state. Data representing exposure to natural infection in the field in 1944 and 1945 indicate that the variety, Katahdin, is the most resistant of the twenty-three varieties tested, while Sequoia showed considerable resistance. The varieties, netted Gem, Chippewa, and Burbank, were the most susceptible under the conditions of these tests. The daily maximum temperature appeared to be of great importance in affecting the rate of field spread of leafroll at the different locations and during the two seasons through its effect upon aphids flights. The relative humidity was a limiting factor for field spread in only a few instances.

Keywords

AMERICAN Potato Journal Potato Virus Potato Variety Daily Maximum Temperature Field Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Adams, J. B. 1946. Aphid resistance in potatoes. Amer. Potato Jour. 23: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bawdin, F. C. 1946. Varietal differences in susceptibility to potato virus Y. Ann. Appl. Biol. 33:46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonde, R. and Simpson, G. W. 1946. Natural field spread of leafroll in different varieties in 1944. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 442:123–124.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    — and — 1946. Leafroll infection in different varieties resulting from inoculation with viruliferous aphids. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 442: 124.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cockerham, G. 1943. Potato breeding for virus resistance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 30:105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies, W. M. 1939. Studies of aphids infesting the potato crop. VII. Report on a survey of the aphis population of potatoes in selected districts of Scotland. Ann. Appl. Biol. 26:116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dykstra, T. P. and Whitaker, W. C. 1938. Experiments on the transmission of potato viruses by vectors. Jour. Agr. Res. 57:319–334.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hovey, C. L. and Simpson, G. W. 1944. Genetic variation in potatoes as it influences the reproduction rate of plant lice. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 426:224.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simpson, G. W. and Hovey, C. L. 1944. Genetic resistance to insect injury in potatoes. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 426:224–225.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, K. M. 1929. Studies on potato virus diseases V. Insect transmission of potato leafroll. Ann. Appl. Biol. 16:209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stevenson, F. J. and Akeley, R. V. 1942. New potato varieties can be produced with less labor and expense than some of the old. Amer. Potato Jour. 19:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    —, Folsom, D. and Dykstra, T. P. 1943. Virus leafroll resistance in the potato. Amer. Potato Jour. 20:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas, I. and Verai, E. J. 1940. Aphis migration. An analysis of the results of five seasons' trapping in North Wales. Ann. Appl. Biol. 27:393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1948

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seth Barton Locke
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Plant PathologyWashington State AgriculturalPullman

Personalised recommendations