Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 207–212 | Cite as

Feasibility and utility of an electronic diary to assess self-report symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

  • Leighann Litcher-Kelly
  • Quinn Kellerman
  • Arthur A. Stone
  • Stephen B. Hanauer


Background: Self-report items from the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) are completed using a 7-day paper diary; however, there are reports of protocol deviations by both patients and researchers/clinicians. The self-report literature has demonstrated these deviations can distort the information collected by introducing recall bias, especially for subjective measures like pain and well-being.Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of using an electronic diary to collect symptom self-reports.Methods: Sixteen patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease completed entries on the diary 12 times per day for 3 weeks. The diary included “user-friendly” features that made it easier to incorporate into their daily lives.Results: Despite 2 compliance outliers, the overall compliance was 88%; when these outliers were removed compliance increased to 92%. Participants used the diary features appropriately and completed a substantial number of assessments per day. Although overall compliance declined significantly over the 3-week study period, the number of prompts completed did not change significantly over time.Conclusions: Limitations include the small sample size, but despite this limitation this report supports the feasibility of collecting symptom information using an electronic diary. Future studies are needed to evaluate the possibility of using an electronic diary to collect the CDAI self-report information in both clinical and research settings.


Inflammatory Bowel Disease Ulcerative Colitis Irritable Bowel Syndrome Behavioral Medicine Busy Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Harding JP, Hamm LR, Ehsanullah RSB, et al.: Use of a novel electronic data collection system in multicenter studies of irritable bowel syndrome.Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 1997,11:1073–1076.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Peters ML, Sorbi MJ, Kruise DA, et al.: Electronic diary assessment of pain, disability and psychological adaptation in patients differing in duration of pain.Pain. 2000,84:181–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Hufford MR, Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE: Paper vs. electronic diaries: Compliance and subject evaluations.Applied Clinical Trials. 2002,April:38–43.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E: Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived.Annual Review of Psychology. 2003,54:579–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Stone AA, Shiffman S: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,16:199–202.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Suls J, Martin RE: Daily recording and ambulatory monitoring methodologies in behavioral medicine.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1993,15:3–7.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, et al.: A review of activity indices and efficacy endpoints for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with Crohn’s disease.Gastroenterology. 2002,122:512–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Hanauer SB, Sandborn W: Management of Crohn’s disease in adults.American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001,96:635–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern R: Development of a Crohn’s disease activity index.Gastroenterology. 1976,106:A517.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Hufford MR, Shields AL: Electronic diaries: Applications and what works in the field.Applied Clinical Trials. 2002,April:46–59.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR: Patient non-compliance with paper diaries.British Medical Journal. 2002,324:1193–1194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Erskine A, Morley S, Pearce S: Memory for pain.Pain. 1990,41:255–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Stone AA, Shiffman S: Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2002,24:236–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Levine JG, et al.: Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study.Pain. 2001,91:277–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Andres PG, Friedman LS: Epidemiology and the natural course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Gastroenterology Clinics. 1999,28:255–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Drossman DA, Leserman J, Mitchell CM, et al.: Health status and health care use in persons with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 1991,36:1746–1755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Stone AA, Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, et al.: Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: Reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction.Pain. 2003,104:343–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leighann Litcher-Kelly
    • 1
  • Quinn Kellerman
    • 1
  • Arthur A. Stone
    • 1
  • Stephen B. Hanauer
    • 2
  1. 1.Applied Behavioral Medicine Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral ScienceStony Brook UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Section of GastroenterologyUniversity of ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations