Advertisement

Science in China Series C: Life Sciences

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 130–135 | Cite as

Comparison on the genotoxic effects of nuclear vs cytoplasmic irradiation from the alteration ofCD59 gene locus

  • Lijun Wu
  • Guoqing Hei
  • An Xu
  • Zengliang Yu
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Using microbeam to irradiate human-hamster hybrid AL cells with defined number of a particles in a highly localized spatial region, this paper showed that cytoplasmic irradiation induced very little toxicity. For example, the cell killing by 4 a particle traversal through the cytoplasm was about 10%, and about 70% cells survived after their cytoplasm was irradiated with 32 a particles. In contrast, the survival fractions for nuclear irradiation at the same doses were 35% and less than 1% respectively. Mutation induction showed that while nuclear irradiation induced 3–4-fold moreCD59 mutants than cytoplasmic irradiation at equivalent particle traversal, at an equitoxic dose level of 90% survival, the latter exposure mode induced 3.3-fold more mutants than nuclear irradiation. Moreover, using multiplex PCR to analyze five marker genes on chromosome 11 (WT, CAT, PTH, APO-A1 and RAS), the results showed that the majority of mutants induced by cytoplasmic irradiation had retained all of the marker genes analyzed. By comparison, the proportion of mutants suffering loss of additional chromosomal markers increased with increasing number of particle traversal through nuclei.

Keywords

microbeam nucleus cytoplasm biological effects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Waldren, C. A., Jones, C., Puck, T. T., Measurement of mutagenesis in mammalian cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1979, 76: 1358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu, L. X., Waldren, C. A., Vannais, D. et al., Cellular and molecular analysis of mutagenesis induced by charged particles of defined linear energy transfer, Radiation Research, 1996, 145: 251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, L. J., Hei, T. K., Randers-Pehrson, R. et al., Columbia University Microbeam: Development of an experimental system for targeting cells individually with counted particles, Nuclear Science and Techniques, 1999, 10(3): 143.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barendsen, G. W., Impairment of the proliferative capacity of human cells in culture by α-particles with differing linear-energy transfer, International Journal of Radiation Biology, 1964, 8: 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roberts, C. J., Goodhead, D. T., The effects of 238Pu alpha-particles on the mouse fibroblast cell line C3H10T1/2: Characterization of source and RBE for cell survival, International Journal of Radiation Biology, 1987, 52(6): 871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munro, T. R., The relative radiosensitivity of the nucleus and cytoplasm of Chinese hamster fibroblasts, Radiation Research, 1970, 42: 451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hei, T. K., Zhu, L. X., Vannais, D. et al., Molecular analysis of mutagenesis by high LET radiation, Advances in Space Research, 1994, 14(10): 355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hei, T. K., Liu, S. X., Waldren, C., Mutagenicity of arsenic in mammalian cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95: 8103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nagasawa, H., Little, J. B., Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of α-particles, Cancer Research, 1992, 52: 6394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deshpande, A., Goodwin, E. H., Bailey, S. M. et al., Alpha particle-induced sister chromid exchange in normal human lung fibroblasts: evidence for an extranuclear target, Radiation Research, 1996, 145: 260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindquist, S., The heat shock response, Annual Review of Biochemistry, 1986, 55: 1151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta, S. S., Bhattacharjee, S. B., Induction of repair functions by hydrogen peroxide in Chinese hamster cells, International Journal of Radiation Biology, 1988, 53: 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Narayanan, P. K., Goodwin, E. H., Lehnert, B. E., Particles initiate biological production of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in human cells, Cancer Research, 1997, 57: 3963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thacker, J., The nature of mutants induced by ionizing radiation in cultured hamster cells (III)—Molecular characterization of HPRT-deficient mutants induced by gamma-rays or alpha-particles showing that the majority have deletions of all or part of the HPRT gene, Mutation Research, 1986, 160: 267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jostes, R. F., Fleck, E. W., Morgan, T. L. et al., Southern and PCR analysis of HPRT mutations induced by radon and its progeny, Radiation Research, 1994, 137: 371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Plasma PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesHefeiChina
  2. 2.Center of Radiological ResearchColumbia UniversityNYUSA

Personalised recommendations