Folia Microbiologica

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 71–78 | Cite as

The passive anaphylactic reaction in guinea pigs elicited by whole and cathepsin D-degraded antigen

  • J. Štefanovič
  • D. Kotulová
  • L’. Bergendi
  • I. Huzuláková


The systemic anaphylactic reaction and thein vitro anaphylactic contraction of the terminal segment of the ileum performed according to the Schultz-Dale technique, were elicited in guinea pigs passively sensitized with rabbit antibodies to human serum albumin, using whole and cathepsin D degraded antigen. The intensity of the systemic anaphylactic response that was evoked by degraded antigen was lower; a highly significant suppression of the response was obtained provided an antigen degraded more than by 70% was injected. With an increasing degradation of antigen, more animals responded with lower or even with no reaction; the number of animals developing severe or lethal shock, decreased at the same time. The number of animals that developed a medium anaphylactic response remained at the same level. The degraded antigen did not evoke the anaphylactic contraction of the terminal segment of the ileumin vitro, and moreover, it blocked the contraction after addition of the whole antigen.


Human Serum Albumin Anaphylactic Reaction Terminal Segment Intracellular Protease Passive Sensitization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amemiya H., Yokoyama T., Torisu M., Putnam C. W., Anderson J. T., Starzl T. E.: The reduction of antigenicity of heterologous antilymphocyte serum with acid Taka-protease.Clin. Exptl. Immunol.11, 67 (1972).Google Scholar
  2. Amkraut A. A., Rosenberg L. T., Raffel S.: Elicitation of PCA by univalent and divalent haptens.J. Immunol.91, 644 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett A. J., Dingle J. T. (Eds.):Tissue Proteinases. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam-London, American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc.—New York 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Borek T. (Ed.):Immunogenicity. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam-London 1972.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell D. H., Garvey J. S.: Nature of retained antigen and its role in immune mechanisms.Adv. Immunol.3, 261 (1963).Google Scholar
  6. Campbell D. H., Garvey J. S.: Localization and fate of foreign antigens in tissues, p. 18, in M. Samter, H. L. Alexander (Eds.):Immunological Diseases, Little, Brown and Comp., Boston 1965.Google Scholar
  7. Das B. R., Maurer P. H., Liu C. T.: Some immunological studies with heat-denaturated bovine serum albumin and its peptic, tryptic and chymotryptic peptides.Proc. Soc. Exptl. Med.133, 1456 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. Green J. F., Thielke K. G., Raffel S.: Univalent antigen as elicitor of anaphylactic reactions.J. Immunol.104, 863 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haurowitz F.:Immunochemistry and the Biosynthesis of Antibodies. Interscience Publishers, New York-London-Sydney 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Heidelberger M., Kendall F. E.: A quantitative study of the precipitin reaction between type IIIPneumococcus polysacharide and purified homologous antibody.J. Exptl. Med.50, 809 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoene R., Swineford O., Quelch S.: Desensitization with haptens.J. Allergy32, 381 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ichiki A., Parish C. R.: Clevage of bacterial flagellin with proteolytic enzymes. I. Physicochemical and antigenic properties of the tryptic and peptic peptides.Immunochemistry9, 153 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kabat E. A., Mayer M. M.:Experimental Immunochemistry. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher Springfield, Illinois 1961.Google Scholar
  14. Kaminski M.: The analysis of the antigenic structure of protein molecules.Progr. Allergy9, 79 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lapresle C.: Étude de la dégradation de la sérumalbumine humaine par un extrait de rate de lapin. II. Mise en évidence de trois groupements spécifiques différents dans le motif antigénique de l’albumine humaine et de trois anticorps correspondants dans le sérum de lapin anti albumine humaine.Ann. Inst. Pasteur89, 654 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. Lapresle C.: Hétérogénéité des anticorps anti-protéines.Ann. Inst. Pasteur97, 626 (1959).Google Scholar
  17. Lapresle C.: Rabbit cathepsins D and E p. 135, in A. J. Barrett, J. T. Dingle (Eds.):Tissue Proteinases, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam-London, American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc.— New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Lapresle C., Goldstein I. J.: Immunogenicity of a fragment of human serum albumin.J. Immunol.102, 733 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lapresle C., Webb T.: Degradation of a protein antigen by intracellular enzymes, p. 44, inCiba Foundation Symposium on Cellular Aspects of Immunity 1960a.Google Scholar
  20. Lapresle C., Webb T.: Étude de la dégradation de la sérumalbumine humaine par un extrait de rate de lapin. VII. Isolement et propriétés d’un fragment d’albumine.Ann. Inst. Pasteur99, 523 (1960b).Google Scholar
  21. Lapresle C., Webb T.: The purification and properties of a proteolytic enzyme, rabbit cathepsin E and further studies on rabbit cathepsin D.Biochem. J.84, 455 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lapresle C., Kaminski M., Tanner C. E.: Immunochemical study of the enzymatic degradation of human serum albumin: an analysis of the antigenic structure of a protein molecule.J. Immunol.82, 94 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu C. T., Das B. R., Maurer P. H.: Immunochemical studies of the tryptic, chymotryptic and-peptic peptides of the heat denaturated bovine serum albumin.Immunochemistry4, 1 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDuffie F. C., Kabat E. A.: A comparative study of methods used for analysis of specific precipitat in quantitative immunochemistry.J. Immunol.77, 193 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchison N. A.: Dose, frequency and route of administration of antigen, p. 87, in F. Borek (Ed.):Immunogenicity, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam-London 1972.Google Scholar
  26. Rhodes J.:In vitro studies on the fate of antigen.Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Section B79, 153 (1971).Google Scholar
  27. Richter W.: Hapten inhibition of passive antidextran dextran anaphylaxis in guinea pigs.Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol.41, 826 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryan W. L., Lee J. W.: Antigen catabolism by lysosomal enzymes.Immunochemistry7, 251 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz R. S., Ryder R. J. W., Gottlieb A. A.: Macrophages and antibody synthesis.Progr. Allergy Appl. Immunol.11, 81 (1970).Google Scholar
  30. Sónak R., Štefanovič J.: The passive anaphylactic reaction in guinea pigs. (In Slovak)Bratisl. Lek. Listy37, 606 (1957).Google Scholar
  31. Štefanovič J.: Proteases of rabbit polymorphonuclear leukocytes, macrophages and lymphocytes and their relation to the degradation of antigen. (In Slovak)Folia Fac. Med. Univ. Comenianae2, 3 (1964).Google Scholar
  32. Štefanovič J., Bergendi L’.: Intensity of anaphylactic reaction after the degradation of antigen by the cell proteases, p. 116, inSymposium Allergologicum Pragae, Praha 1967.Google Scholar
  33. Štefanovič J., Ferenčík M.: The inhibitory effect of homologous immunoglobulin G on the degradation of antigen (human serum albumin) by rabbit cathepsin D.Folia Microbiol.14, 571 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Štefanovič J., Kotulová D.: The influence of the rabbit’s white blood picture and trypsin inhibitor levels of injections of integral and cathepsin D degraded antigen. (In Slovak)Bratisl. Lek. Listy46, 330 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Štefanovič J., Webb T., Lapresle C.: Étude des cathepsins D et E dans de préparations de polynucléaires, de macrophages et de lymphocytes de lapin.Ann. Inst. Pasteur103, 276 (1962).Google Scholar
  36. Weck A. L. de, Schneider C. H.: Some observations on the molecular mechanisms of immediate type allergic reactions.Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol.36, 62 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Whitehouse F., Mayhew H. E.: The enzymatic digestion of rabbit anti-Ehrlich ascites tumor cell globulin.The University of Michigan Med. Bull.25, 403 (1959).Google Scholar
  38. Yuan L., Campbell D. H.: A unique low molecular weight antigen fragment associated with oligoribonucleopeptide in lymph nodes and spleen.Immunochemistry8, 185 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yuan L., Campbell D. H.: Thein vivo andin vitro immunogenicity and antigenic specificity of lymphoid antigen fragment-oligoribonucleopeptide conjugates.Immunochemistry9, 1 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yuan L., Garvey J. S., Campbell D. H.: Molecular forms of antigen in the circulation following immunization.Immunochemistry7, 601 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Štefanovič
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Kotulová
    • 1
    • 2
  • L’. Bergendi
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. Huzuláková
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of MedicineComsnius UniversityBratislava
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of MedicineComsnius UniversityBratislava

Personalised recommendations