Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 44–52 | Cite as

Ecological footprint analysis based on RS and GIS in arid land

Ecological Environment


Sustainable development has become a primary objective for many countries and regions throughout the world now. The ecological footprint (EF) is a kind of concise method of quantifiably measuring the natural capital consumption and it can reflect the goal of sustainability. In this paper, the concept, the theory and method of ecological footprint are introduced. On this basis, the study brings forward the method of ecological footprint and capacity prediction. The method is employed for the ecological footprint prediction combining consumption model with population model and the technique is adopted for the ecological capacity (EC) prediction uniting the Geographical Cellular Automata (Geo CA) and Geographic Information System (GIS). The above models and methods are employed to calculate EF and EC in 1995 and 2000 and predict them in 2005 in Hexi Corridor. The result shows that EF is continually increasing, and EC ascended in the anterior 5 years and will descend in the posterior 5 years. This suit of method is of the character of accuracy and speediness.

Key words

RS GIS Cellular Automata ecological footprint arid land Hexi Corridor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bicknell K B, Ball R J, Cullen Ret al., 1998. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy.Ecological Economics, 27: 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferng J, 2001. Using composition of land multiplier to estimate ecological footprints associated with production activity.Ecological Economics, 37: 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerbens-Leenes P W, Nonhebel S, 2002. Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food.Ecological Economics, 42: 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haberl H, Erb K, Krausmann F, 2001. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926–1995.Ecological Economics, 38: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hanley N, Moffatt I, Faichney Ret al., 1999. Measuring sustainability: a time series of alternative indicators for Scotland.Ecological Economics, 28: 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hubacek K, Giljum S, 2003. Applying physical input-output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities.Ecological Economics, 44: 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kratena K, 2004. ‘Ecological value added’ in an integrated ecosystem-economy model: an indicator for sustainability.Ecological Economics, 48: 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lenzen M, Murray S A, 2001. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia.Ecological Economics, 37: 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rees W E, Wackernagel M, 1996. Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability.Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 16: 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roth E, Rosenthal H, Burbridge P, 2000. A discussion of the use of the sustainability index: ‘ecological footprint’ for aquaculture production.Aquat. Living Resour., 13: 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Senbel M, McDaniels T, Dowlatabadi H, 2003. The ecological footprint: a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America.Global Environmental Change, 13: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stoglehner G, 2003. Ecological footprint: a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies.Journal of Cleaner Production, 11: 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Torras M, 2003. An ecological footprint approach to extent debt relief.World Development, 31(12): 2161–2171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wackernagel M, Rees W E, 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 28–132.Google Scholar
  15. Wackernagel M, Rees W E, 1997. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective.Ecological Economics, 20: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello Pet al., 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept.Ecological Economics, 29: 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Warren-Rhodes K, Koenig A, 2001. Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development.Ecological Economics, 39: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Van den Bergh J C J M, Verbruggen H, 1999. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’.Ecological Economics, 29: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong, Zhang Zhiqiang, 2001. Measuring sustainable development with the ecological footprint method: take Zhangye prefecture as an example.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(9): 1484–1493. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong, 2000. The calculation and analysis of ecological footprints of Gansu Province.Acta Geographica Sinica, 55(5): 607–616. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Zhou Chenghu, Sun Zhanli, Xie Yichun, 1999. The Research of Geographical Cellular Automata. Beijing: Science Press, 52–72. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchCASBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations