Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 188–199 | Cite as

Positive and negative life changes experienced by survivors of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

  • Keith M. Bellizzi
  • Melissa Farmer Miller
  • Neeraj K. Arora
  • Julia H. Rowland


Background: The impact of cancer on adult survivors of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) is understudied.Purpose: We examined positive and negative life changes (health behaviors, relationships, financial situation) experienced by survivors of NHL and their association with physical and mental function.Methods: Using the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program, 744 questionnaires were mailed to adult survivors of NHL: 308 provided complete data for analyses (M age=59.8, SD=14.9).Results: Perceptions of positive and negative life changes were common in our sample, with 77.9% of NHL survivors reporting at least one positive change and 78.6% reporting at least one negative change. Cancer had the greatest positive change on relationships and the most negative change on survivors’ financial situation. There was an equal distribution of survivors classified as having experienced positive change and negative change on health behaviors. Regardless of whether positive and negative life change were entered into separate regression models or the same model, an increase in negative life change in each of the domains was significantly associated with a decrease in physical and mental functioning. Positive change was significantly associated only with physical functioning when examining overall change (p=.018) and health behaviors (p=.013), and the inclusion of negative change attenuated these associations.Conclusions: In designing interventions to improve the mental and physical function of NHL survivors, the greatest benefit may likely be achieved by reducing the negative effects of cancer. Perhaps positive life change are related in more specific ways to other indexes of adjustment, but our findings failed to show a positive relationship with mental and physical function.


Cancer Survivor Breast Cancer Survivor Behavioral Medicine Negative Change Financial Situation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    American Cancer Society:American Cancer Society Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Devlin J, Maquire P, Phillips P: Psychological problems associated with diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas. II. Prospective study.British Medical Journal. 1987,295:955–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Carter R, Carter C: Individual and marital adjustment in spouse pairs subsequent to mastectomy.The American Journal of Family Therapy. 1993,21:291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Glanz K, Lerman C: Psychosocial impact of breast cancer: A critical review.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1992,19:204–212.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Mehta SS, Lubeck DP, Pasta DJ, Litwin MS: Fear of recurrence in patients undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer: Results from CaPSURE.The Journal of Urology. 2003,170:1931–1933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, et al.: Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: A follow-up study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002,94:39–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Carpenter JS, Brockopp DY, Andrykowski MA: Self-transformation as a factor in the self-esteem and well-being of breast cancer survivors.Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999,29:1402–1411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S: The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site.Psycho-Oncology. 2001,10:19–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Cordova MJ, Cunningham LLC, Carlson CR, Andrykowski MA. Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: A controlled comparison study.Health Psychology. 2001,20:176–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG:Trauma & Transformation: Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, p. 163.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Park CL, Lechner SC: Measurement issues in assessing growth following stressful life experiences. In Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (eds),Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Sears SR, Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S: The yellow brick road and the emerald city: Benefit finding, positive reappraisal coping and posttraumatic growth in women with early-stage breast cancer.Health Psychology. 2003,22:487–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Andrykowski MA, Cordova MJ, Studts JL, Miller TW: Posttraumatic stress disorder after treatment for breast cancer: Prevalence of diagnosis and use of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PLC-C) as a screening instrument.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 1998,66:586–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Tomich PL, Helgeson VS: Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer.Health Psychology. 2004,23:16–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Frazier P, Tashiro T, Berman M, Steger M, Long J: Correlates of levels and patterns of positive life changes following sexual assault.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 2004,72:19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Linley P, Joseph S: Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review.Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2004,17:11–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Bellizzi KM, Blank TO: Predicting posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors.Health Psychology. 2006,25:47–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Stanton AL, Bower JE, Low CA: Posttraumatic growth after cancer. In: Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (eds),Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Tedeschi RG, Park CL, Calhoun LG:Posttraumatic Growth: Positive Changes in the Aftermath of Crisis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, p. 258.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Bower JE, Meyerowitz BE, Desmond KA, et al.: Perceptions of positive meaning and vulnerability following breast cancer: Predictors and outcomes among long-term breast cancer survivors.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005,29:236–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Klauer T, Ferring D, Filipp S-H: “Still stable after all this...?”: Temporal comparison in coping with severe and chronic illness.International Journal of Behavioral Development. 1998,22:339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Curbow B, Somerfield MR, Baker F, Wingard JR, Legro MW: Personal changes, dispositional optimism, and psychological adjustment to bone marrow transplantation.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1993,16:423–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Frazier P, Conlon A, Glaser T: Positive and negative life changes following sexual assault.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 2001,69:1048–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG: The Posttraumatic Growth In ventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma.Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1996,9:455–472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Park CL, Cohen LH, Murch RL: Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth.Journal of Personality. 1996,64:71–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    McMillen JC, Fisher RH: The Perceived Benefit Scales: Measuring perceived positive life changes after negative events.Social Work Research. 1998,22:173–187.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Tomich PL, Helgeson VS: Five years later: A cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women.Psycho-Oncology. 2002,11:154–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Antoni MH, Lehman JM, Kilbourn KM, et al.: Cognitivebehavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer.Health Psychology. 2001,20:20–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Park CL, Fenster JR: Stress-related growth: Predictors of occurrence and correlates with psychological adjustment.Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 2004,23:195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Siegel K, Schrimshaw EW: Perceiving benefits in adversity: Stress-related growth in women living with HIV/AIDS.Social Science and Medicine. 2000,51:1543–1554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV: Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984,46:489–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Carver CS, Antoni MH: Finding benefit in breast cancer during the year after diagnosis predicts better adjustment 5 to 8 years after diagnosis.Health Psychology. 2004,23:595–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Fromm K, Andrykowski MA, Hunt J: Positive and negative psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation: Implications for quality of life assessment.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1996,19:221–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Zoellner T, Maercker A: Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology — A critical review and introduction of a two component model.Clinical Psychological Review. 2006,26:626–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Taylor S: Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.American Psychologist. 1983,38:1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Schaefer JA, Moos RH: The context of posttraumatic growth: Life crises, individual and social resources, and coping. In Tedeschi RG, Park CL, Calhoun LG (eds),Posttraumatic Growth: Positive Changes in the Aftermath of Crisis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, 99–127.Google Scholar
  37. (37).
    Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG: Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence.Psychological Inquiry. 2004,15:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Ware JJ, Kosinski M, Gandek B:SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality-Metrics Incorporated, 2000.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Ware J, Kosinski M, Dewey J:How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated, 2000.Google Scholar
  40. (40).
    Anderson JP, Kaplan RM, Coons SJ, Schneiderman LJ: Comparison of the Quality of Well-being Scale and the SF-36 results among two samples of ill adults: AIDS and other illnesses.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998,51:755–762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Baker C, Schuller DE: A functional status scale for measuring quality of life outcomes in head and neck cancer patients.Cancer Nursing. 1995,18:452–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW: Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994,67:1063–1078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Blank TO, Bellizzi KM: After prostate cancer: Predictors of well-being among long-term prostate cancer survivors.Cancer. 2006,106:2128–2135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Sherbourne C, Stewart A: The MOS social support survey.Social Science Medicine. 1991,32:705–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG: The foundations of posttraumatic growth: An expanded framework. In Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (eds),Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006, 3–23.Google Scholar
  46. (46).
    McBride CM, Ostroff JS: Teachable moments for promoting smoking cessation: The context of cancer care and survivorship.Cancer Control. 2003,10:325–333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. (47).
    Petrella RJ, Koval JJ, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH: Can primary care doctors prescribe exercise to improve fitness? The step test exercise prescription (STEP) project.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003,24:316–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. (48).
    Mandelblatt J, Kanetsky PA: Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer.Journal of Family Practice. 1995,40:162–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    Sallis JF, Hovell MF: Determinants of exercise behavior.Exercise Sport Science Review. 1990,18:301–330.Google Scholar
  50. (50).
    Bellizzi KM: Expressions of generativity and posttraumatic growth in adult cancer survivors.International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 2004,58:247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. (51).
    Blank TO, Bellizzi KM, Murphy K, Ryan K: How do men “make sense of” their prostate cancer?: Age and treatment factors.Gerontologist. 2003,43:342–343.Google Scholar
  52. (52).
    Schulz U, Mohamed NE: Turning the tide: Benefit finding after cancer surgery.Social Science and Medicine. 2004,59:653–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. (53).
    Park CL, Helgeson VS: Introduction to the special section: Growth following highly stressful life events—current status and future directions.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 2006,74:791–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (eds):The Foundations of Posttraumatic Growth: An Expanded Framework. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith M. Bellizzi
    • 1
  • Melissa Farmer Miller
    • 2
  • Neeraj K. Arora
    • 3
  • Julia H. Rowland
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteBethesda
  2. 2.Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer PreventionNational Cancer InstituteBethesda
  3. 3.Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteBethesda

Personalised recommendations