Advertisement

The Botanical Review

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 81–166 | Cite as

Cytogenetics of the vegetable crops. II. Crucifers

  • S. H. Yarnell
Article

Keywords

Botanical Review Vegetable Crop Reciprocal Cross Brassica Oleracea Somatic Chromosome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    Akhtar, A. R. Studies in Indian Brassicae. I. Sterility and selective pollen tube growth. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.2: 280–292. 1932.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alam, Z. Cytological studies of some Indian oleiferous Cruciferae. III. Ann. Bot.50: 85–102. 1936.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allgayer, H. Genetische Untersuchungen mit Gartenkohl (Brassica oleracea) nach Kreuzungsversuchen von Richard Freudenberg. Zeit. Ind. Abst. u. Vererb.47: 191–260. 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, M. E. Fusarium resistance in Wisconsin Hollander cabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 639–661. 1933.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Attia, M. S. The nature of incompatibility in cabbage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.56: 369–371. 1950.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ————— andMunger, H. M. Self-incompatibility and the production of hybrid cabbage seed. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.56: 363–368. 1950.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bailey, L. H. The cultivated Brassicas. Gentes Herb.1: 53–108. 1922.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ————— The cultivated Brassicas. Gentes Herb.2: 211–267. 1930.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    —————. Certain noteworthy Brassicas. Gentes Herb.4: 319–330. 1940.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    -----. Manual of cultivated plants. 1116 p. (Revised). 1949.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bain, D. C. Reaction ofBrassica seedlings to black rot. Phytopath.42: 497–500. 1952.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    —————. Blackrot resistance in cabbage. Phytopath.44: 331. 1954. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barker, E. E., andCohen, R. H. Variability in the radish. Jour. Hered.9: 357–361. 1918.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Becker, Th. Siebenjährige blutenbiologische Studien an den CruciferenBrassica napus L.,Brassica rapa L.,Brassica oleracea L.,Raphanus L. undSinapis L. Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.30: 222–240. 1950.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bishop, C. J. The genetical basis of sterility in tetraploid broccoli. Genetics32: 79. 1947. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blank, L. M. Fusarium resistance in Wisconsin All Seasons cabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.55: 497–510. 1937.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ————— andWalker, J. C. Inheritance of Fusarium resistance in brussels sprouts and kohlrabi. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 1015–1022. 1933.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boswell, V. R. A study of some environmental factors influencing the shooting to seed of wintered-over cabbage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.22: 380–393. 1925.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    -----. Studies of premature flower formation in wintered-over cabbage. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 313. 1929.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    —————. Our vegetable travellers. Nat. Geog.96: 145–217. 1949.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Branion, H. D., Roberts, J. S., Cameron, C. R., andMcCready, A. M. The ascorbic acid content of cabbage. Jour. Am. Diet. Ass’n.24: 101–104. 1948.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brenkey, E. P., andCarlson, E. C. Control of the cabbage aphid (Breujcoryne brassicae) in cabbage beds and seed fields. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.455: 38. Ann. Rep. 1944.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brune, W. Observations on compatibility within the genusBrassica. Rev. Ceres [Brazil]8: 158–172. 1949.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burrell, R. C., Brown, H. D., andEbright, V. R. Ascorbic acid content of cabbage as influenced by variety, season, and soil fertility. Food Res.51: 247–252. 1940.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Calder, R. A. Interpollination of Brassicas. Its significance in relation to seed-production. New Zeal. Jour. Agr.55: 299–308. 1937.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep.1929: 104. 1929.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Candolle, Alphonse de. Origin of cultivated plants. 1884.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Catcheside, D. G. The chromosomal relationships in the swede and turnip groups ofBrassica. Ann. Bot.48: 601–633. 1934.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    -----. Secondary pairing inBrassica oleracea. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 366–378. 1937.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chopinet, R. Sur quelques hibrides expérimentelle interspécifique et intergénérique chez les crucifères. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]215: 545–547. 1942.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    —————. Nos choux cultivés: leurs relations genetiques et la nomenclature moderne. Rev. Hort. Paris30: 435–440. 1947.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crane, M. B. The origin and relationships of theBrassica crops. Jour. Roy. Hort. Soc.68: 172–174. 1943.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crescini, Francesco. Il “Rafanobrassica” (Raphanus sativus × Brassica oleracea). Italia Agric.79(5): 253–258. 1942.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Daniel, Lucien. Sur deux greffes nouvelles. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]184: 1084–1085. 1927.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dark, S. O. S. The development of the flowers from the curd of broccoli (Brassica oleracea botrytis). Ann. Bot. (N.S.)2: 751–752. 1938.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Davey, V. McM. Colour inheritance in swedes and turnips and its bearing on the identification of commercial stocks. Scot. Jour. Agr.14: 303–316. 1913.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    —————. Inheritance of colour inBrassica napus. Jour. Genet.25: 183–190. 1932.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    —————. Hybridization in Brassicae and the occasional contamination of seed stocks. Ann. Appl. Biol.26: 634–636. 1939.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davies, D. W., Griffith, Moses, andEvans, Gwilym. “Finger and toe” experiments in Mid-Wales, involving the use of resistant varieties of swedes Welsh Jour. Agr.4: 295–303. 1928.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Davies, W. M. The “many necked” condition of swedes in relation to varietal and manurial trials. Welsh Jour. Agr.7: 319–332. 1931.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Detjen, L. R. A preliminary report on cabbage breeding. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.23: 325–332. 1926.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    —————. Sterility in the common cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.). Mem. Hort. Soc. New York3: 277–280. 1926.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    ----- andMcCue, C. A. Cabbage characters and their heredity. Del. Agr. Exp. Stat., Bull. 180. 1933.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Doolittle, S. P. Vegetable disease investigations in the United States Department of Agriculture, 1885–1950. U. S. Dept. Agr., Plant Dis. Rep., Suppl.195: 398–412. 1950.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eddins, A. H. Cabbage diseases other than downy mildew and Alternaria leafspot. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep.1950: 116–117. 1950.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Edwards, S. F. Cabbage resistance to black rot. Ont. Agr. Col., Ann. Rep. (1907)33: 134. 1908.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Evans, A. C. Physiological relationships between insects and their host plants. I. The effect of the chemical composition of the plant on reproduction and production of winged forms inBrevicoryne brassicae L. (Aphididae). Ann. Appl. Biol.25: 558–572. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fairchild, David. The world was my garden. 1938. [p. 165, 407].Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fedorinchik, N. S. [Investigation on the determination of the injuriousness of thePlasmodiophora brassicae and development of immune varieties of cabbage]. Vestnik Zashch. Rast. [Plant Prot]. Leningrad2: 87–95. 1935. [Russia with Engl. summ].Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Findlay, W. M. A disease-resisting turnip. Scot. Jour. Agr.14: 173–183. 1931.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Foster, H. H. Reaction of species and varieties of Cruciferae to artificial inoculation of cabbage downy mildew. Phytopath.37: 433. 1947. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    ————— andPinckard, J. A. Resistance to rust by cabbage tested at Crystal Spring. Miss. Farm Res.7(11): 7. 1944.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Foster, R. E., andWalker, J. C. Improvement of ascorbic acid content in yellows-resistant cabbage. Phytopath.36: 398. 1946. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Frandsen, K. J. The experimental formation ofBrassica napus L. var.oleifera D.C. andBrassica carinata Braun. Dansk. Bot. Arkiv.12(7): 1–16. 1947.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Frandsen, H. N., andWinge, O.Brassica napocampestris, a new constant amphidiploid species hybrid. Hereditas16: 212–218. 1932.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Frost, H. B. Heterosis and dominance of size factors inRaphanus. Genetics8: 116–153. 1923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fukushima, E. Preliminary report onBrassica-Raphanus hybrids. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo5: 48–50. 1929.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    —————. On the F1 hybrid betweenBrassica carinata and the radish. Jap. Jour. Genet.18: 202–203. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    —————. Cytogenetic studies onBrassica andRaphanus. I. Studies on the intergeneric F1 hybrids betweenBrassica andRaphanus. Jour. Dept. Agr. Kyushu Univ.7: 282–400. 1945.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Furtado, C. X., andHolttum, R. E. The Chinese mustards and cabbages grown in Singapore. M.A.H.A. Mag. [Kuala Lumpur]10: 47–51. 1940.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gallastegui, Cruz. Numero de cromosomas en algunas especies del generoBrassica. Bol. R. Soc. Espan. Hist. Nat.26: 185–191. 1926.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gante, Th. Hernieresistenz bei Weisskohl. I. Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.30: 188–197. 1951.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gates, R. R. Wild cabbages and the effects of cultivation. Jour. Genet.51: 363–372. 1953.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gerretsen, F. C., andHaagsma, Netty. Occurrence of antifungal substances inBrassica rapa, Brassica oleracea andBeta vulgaris. Nature168: 659. 1951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gould, S., Tressler, D. K., andKing, C. G. Vitamin C content of vegetables. V. Cabbage. Food Res.1: 472. 1936.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gravatt, A. A radish-cabbage hybrid. Jour. Hered.5: 269–272. 1914.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Grebinskaia, M. I. [The anatomy of the amphidiploidRaphanobrassica and its parent]. Bot. Zhurn. SSSR [Jour. Bot. URSS]23: 106–121. 1938. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Haga, T. Relationship of genom to secondary pairing inBrassica. Jap. Jour. Genet.13: 277–284. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hallqvist, C. Brassicakreuzungen. Bot. Not.1915: 97–112. 1915.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    —————. Ein neuer Fall von Dimerie beiBrassica napus. Bot. Not.1916: 39–42. 1916.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hallsworth, E. G., andLewis, V. M. Ascorbic acid in cabbages. Emp. Jour. Exp. Agr.17: 28–36. 1949.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Harrison, P. K., andBrubaker, R. W. The relative abundance of cabbage caterpillars on cole crops grown under similar conditions. Jour. Econ. Ent.36: 589–592. 1943.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Harvey, R. B. Varietal differences in the resistance of cabbage and lettuce to low temperature. Ecology3: 134–139. 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hendrick, J. The prevention of finger-and-toe in turnips. Liming and a disease resistant variety. Trans. Highl. Agr. Soc. Scot.44: 52–63. 1932.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Henslow, G. The history of the cabbage tribe. Jour. Roy. Hort. Soc.34: 15–23. 1908.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Herrmann, F. Ueber die Vererbung des Kopf- und Knollenbildung bei Kohl und Kohlrabi. Gartenwelt.25: 146–148. 1921.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hougas, R. W., Rieman, G. H., andStokes, G. W. Resistance to white rust in horseradish seedlings. Phytopath.42: 109–110. 1952.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Howard, H. W. The chromosome number of the swede,Brassica napus L. Jour. Genet.35: 383–386. 1938.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    —————. The fertility of amphidiploids from the crossRaphanus sativus × Brassica oleracea. Jour. Genet.36: 239–273. 1938.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    —————. The cytology of autotetraploid kale,Brassica oleracea. Cytologia10: 77–87. 1939.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    —————. The size of seeds in diploid and autotetraploidBrassica oleracea L. Jour. Genet.38: 325–340. 1939.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    —————. The nomenclature ofBrassica species. Curr. Sci.9: 494–495. 1940.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    —————. The effect of polyploidy and hybridity on seed size in crosses betweenBrassica chinensis, B. carinata, amphidiploidB. chinensis-carinata and autotetraploidB. chinensis. Jour. Genet.43: 105–119. 1942.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    —————. Self-incompatibility in polyploid forms ofBrassica andRaphanus. Nature149: 302–303. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    —————. Autotetraploid green watercress. Jour. Hort. Sci.27: 273–277. 1952.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Iwasa, S. [Studies on artificial triploid and hexaploidBrassica types having the three genomes abc.] [Sci. Bul. Fact. Agr. Kyushu Univ.]13: 90–99. 1951. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.24: 1202] [Original not seen.]Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jaretzky, R. Beziehungen zwischen Chromosomenzahl und Systematik bei den Cruciferen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.4: 485–527. 1932.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jones, L. R. Disease resistance in cabbage. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.4: 42–46. 1918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    ----- andGilman, J. C. The control of cabbage yellows through disease resistance. Wisc. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 38. 1915.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    —————, andMonteith, John, Jr. Fusarium resistant cabbage: progress with second early varieties. Jour. Agr. Res.30: 1027–1034. 1925.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kajanus, B. Genetische Studien anBrassica. Zeit. Ind. Abst. u. Vererb.6: 217–237. 1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    —————. Ueber die Vererbungsweise gewisser Merkmale derBeta-undBrassica-Ruben. II.Brassica. Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.1: 419–463. 1913.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    —————. Über Bastardierungen zwischenBrassica napus L. undBrassica rapa L. Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.5: 265–322. 1917.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kakizaki, Y. Self-sterility in the Chinese cabbage. Jour. Hered.13: 374–376. 1922.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    —————. A preliminary report of crossing experiments with cruciferous plants, with special reference to sexual compatibility and matroclinous hybrids. Jap. Jour. Genet.3: 49–82. 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    —————. An instance of radish-cabbage hybrids. Jour. Sci. Agr. Soc. Japan298: 438–446. 1927.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    —————. A dominant white-flowered mutant ofBrassica oleracea L. Jap. Jour. Genet.6: 55–60. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    —————. Studies on the genetics and physiology of self- and cross-incompatibility in the common cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var.capitata L.). Jap. Jour. Bot.5: 133–208. 1930.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    ————— andKasai, Tadayuki. Bud pollination in cabbage and radish. Jour. Hered.24: 359–360. 1933.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Karpechenko, G. D. [The number of chromosomes and the genetic correlation of cultivated cruciferae]. [Bul. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed].13: 3–14. 1922. [Russian]Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    —————. Hybrids of ♀Raphanus sativus L. × ♂Brassica oleracea L. Jour. Genet.14: 375–396. 1924.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    —————. The production of polyploid gametes in hybrids. Hereditas9: 349–368. 1927.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    —————. [Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L. ×Brassica oleracea L.] [Bull. Appl. Bot. & Plant-Breed.]17(3): 305–408. 1927. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    —————. Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L. ×Brassica oleracea L. Zeit. Ind. Abst. u. Vererb.48: 1–85. 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    —————. [A contribution to the synthesis of a constant hybrid of three species]. Proc. U.S.S.R. Congr. Genet.2: 277–294. 1929. [Russian with Engl. summ.]Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    —————. [Increasing the crossability of a species by doubling its chromosome number.] [Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. and Pl. Breed. Ser. II.]7: 37–51. 1937. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    —————. [Experimental production of tetraploid hybrids,Brassica oleracea L. ×B. carinata Al. Braun.] [Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. and Pl. Breed. Ser. II.]7: 53–68. 1937. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    —————. [Reciprocal hybrids between Raphanobrassica and tetraploid cabbage.] [Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. and Pl. Breed. Ser. II.]7: 447–453. 1937. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    ————— andBogdanova, E. N. [A fertile tetraploid hybridBrassica oleracea L. ×Brassica chinensis L., experimentally produced.] [Bull. Appl. Bot. Leningrad Ser. II.7: 455–464. 1937.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Kristofferson, K. B. Untersuchungen über die F1 und F2 Generation von einem spontanen Bastard zwischen Weisskraut und Grünkohl. Sveriges Utsad. Tidsk.1921: 31–52. 1921. [German summ.]Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    —————. Contributions to the genetics ofBrassica oleracea. Hereditas5: 297–364. 1924.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    —————. Contributions to the genetics ofBrassica oleracea. II. Hereditas9: 343–348. 1927.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kondo, N. [A newRaphanobrassica from the cross 4x Raphanus sativus L. × 4x Brassica oleracea L.] Jap. Jour. Genet.18: 126–130. 1942. [Japanese.] [Plant Breed. Abst.21: 2196.] [Original not seen.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kotowski, F. Effect of self fertilization in cabbage and onion. Mem. Hort. Soc. New York3: 281–284. 1926.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Krickl, M. Zur Züchtung von frestwiderstandsfaehigen und nichtholzig werden den fruehn Kohlrabi. Gartenbauwiss.18: 185–203. 1944.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    —————. Genügen die derzeitigen Werteigenschaften der Radieschen? Saatgutwirtschaft [Stuttgart]5: 63–64. 1953.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kvasnikov, B. V., Osnickaja, E. A., andDemsenko, A. I. [The resistance to club root of cabbage varieties]. [Fruit Vegetable Gardens]1950: 51–53. 1950.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kwan, C. C. Inheritance of some plant characters in cabbage,Brassica oleraceae var.capitata. Jour. Agr. Ass’n. China No. 126–127: 81–127. 1934.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Lamprecht, H., andHertzman, N. [Immuna II, a new variety of turnip, resistant to finger and toe]. Agri Hort. Genet.1: 31–33. 1943. [Swedish with Engl. summ.]Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Larson, R. H., andWalker, J. C. A mosaic disease of cabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 367–392. 1939.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    LeBeau, F. J., andWalker, J. C. Turnip mosaic viruses. Jour. Agr. Res.70: 347–364. 1945.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Lee, S. H. The effect of bud pollination on fertility and F1 fruit characters of some Chinese Brassicas. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.52: 435–440. 1948.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Ling, L., andYang, J. Y. A mosaic of rape and other cultivated crucifers in China. Phytopath.30: 338–342. 1940.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Lobb, W. R. Resistant type of rape for areas infected with club root. New Zeal. Jour. Agr.82: 65–66. 1951.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Longree, Karla, andFenton, Faith. Objective and subjective studies on factors affecting toughness and stringiness of kale (Brassica oleracea acephala.) Food Res.15: 471–489. 1950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Maeda, T., andSasaki, T. Chromosome behavior in the pollen mother cells of “Shogoindaikon” and “Nerimadaikon” the horitcultural varieties ofRaphanus sativus L. Jap. Jour. Genet.10: 78–83. 1934. [Japanese with Eng. summ.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Magruder, R. A new color type in cabbage. Science85: 427–428. 1937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    —————. Improvement in the leafy cruciferous vegetables. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yrbk.1937: 289–299. 1937.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    ————— andMyers, C. H. The inheritance of some plant colors in cabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 233–248. 1933.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Malinowski, E. On the inheritance of some characters in radishes. Compt. Rend. Soc. Sci. Varsovie9: 757–776. 1916. [Polish and English].Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    —————. [On the hybrids of cabbage with curly-leaved kale]. Mem. Inst. Genet. Ecole Super. Agr. Varsovie1: 1–14. 1921. [Polish] [Reviewed in Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.9: 152.] [Original not seen].Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    —————. Quelques observations sur les hybrides du genreBrassica. Mem. Inst. Genet. Ecole Super. Agr. Varsovie2: 145–162. 1924. [Polish with French summ.]Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    —————. Kilka obserwacji nad mieszancami rodzajuBrassica. Pam. Zakladu. Genet. Szkoly Glownej Gosp. Wiejskiego w Warszawie2: 145–162. 1924. Cited by H. Matsuura. A Bibliographical Monograph on Plant Genetics. 1933.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    —————. Genetics ofBrassica. Bib. Genet.5: 1–26. 1929.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Manton, Irene. Introduction to the cytology of Cruciferae. Ann. Bot.46: 509–556. 1932.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    —————. The cytological history of watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.). Zeits. Ind. u. Abst. Vereb.69: 132–157. 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Melhus, I. E., Erwin, A. T., andvan Haltern, F. Cabbage yellows caused byFusarium conglutinans in Iowa. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 235. 1926.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    ————— andPorter, D. R. The use of selection and selfing in improving Iacope cabbage. Phytopath.18: 142. 1928. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Miller, J. C. A study of some factors affecting seed-stalk development in cabbage. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 488. 1929.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    —————. Some factors associated with puffy-headed cabbage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.34: 495–497. 1937.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Mizushima, U. Karyogenetic studies of species and genus hybrids in the tribeBrassiceae ofCruciferae. Tohoku Jour. Agr. Res.1: 1–14. 1950.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    —————. On several artificial allopolyploids obtained in the tribeBrassiceae ofCruciferae. Tohoku Jour. Agr. Res.1: 15–27. 1950.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    ————— andKatsuo, K. A new case of incompatibility inBrassica oleracea L. Jap. Jour. Breed.2: 121–125. 1953. [Japanese with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Mohammad, A., andSikka, S. M. Pseudogamy in genusBrassica. Curr. Sci.9: 280–282. 1940.Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    —————, andAlam, Z. Some breeding investigations on toria (Brassica napus L. var.dichotoma Prain) and sarson (Brassica campestris L. var.sarson Prain). Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 109–136. 1931.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Moldenhawer, K. Über die GattungskreuzungenRaphanus × Brassica. Mem. Inst. Genet. Ecole Super. Agr. Varsovie2: 191–196. 1924.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    —————. [Studies of a hybrid ofRaphanus withBrassica.] Bull. Internat. Acad. Polonaise Sci. et Let. Ser. B. Sci. Nat.1925: 537–560. 1925. [Biol. Abst.2: 426.] [Original not seen]Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    —————. Recherches sur certains croisements interessants du genreBrassica. Bull. Int. Acad. Polonaise Sci. et Lett. Cl. Sci. Math., et Nat. Ser. B: Sci. Nat.1927: 1049–1071. 1928.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Morinaga, T. Interspecific hybridization in Brassica. II. The cytology of F1 hybrids ofB. cernua and various other species with 10 chromosomes. Jap. Jour. Bot.4: 227–289. 1929.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    —————. Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. III. The cytology of F1 hybrid ofB. cernua andB. napella. Jour. Dept. Agr. Kyushu Imp. Univ.2: 199–206. 1929.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    —————. Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. IV. The cytology of F1 hybrids ofB. carinata and some other species with 10 chromosomes. Cytologia3: 77–83. 1931.Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    —————. Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. V. The cytology of F1 hybrid ofB. carinata andB. alboglabra. Jap. Jour. Bot.6: 467–475. 1933.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    —————. Interspecific hybridization inBrassica. VI. The cytology of F1 hybrids ofB. juncea andB. nigra. Cytologia6: 62–67. 1934.Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    ————— andFukushima, E. Another new chromosome number inBrassica. Bot. Mag. Tokyo44: 373–374. 1930.Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    ————— and —————. Kariological studies on a spontaneous haploid mutant ofBrassica napella. Cytologia4: 457–460. 1933.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    ----- andKuriyama, H. On the autopolyploids of the rape. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 967–969. 1937.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Morris, L. E. Pollen germination inBrassica chinensis × Raphanus sativus F1 hybrids. Jour. Genet.33: 435–441. 1936.Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    ————— andRichharia, R. H. A triploid radish × turnip hybrid and some of its progeny. Jour. Genet.34: 275–286. 1937.Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Murphy, E. F. The ascorbic acid content of different varieties of Maine-grown tomatoes and cabbages as influenced by locality, season and stage of maturity. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 483–502. 1942.Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Musil, Albina F. Distinguishing the species ofBrassica by their seed. U. S. Dept. Agr., Misc. Pub. 643. 1948.Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Nagai, K., andSasaoka, T. The number of chromosomes in the cultivatedBrassica. Jap. Jour. Genet.5: 151–158. 1930. [Japanese with Eng. summ.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    ----- and -----. [Chromosome number of crop varieties belonging to Cruciferae. Additional report.] Jour. Okitsu Hort. Sci. No. 25: 76–77. 1930. [Japanese] Cited by H. W. Howard. Jour. Genet.35: 383–386. 1938.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Nat. Inst. Agr. Bot. Cambridge. Cross fertilization in Brassicas. Jour. Min. Agr. (Gr. Brit.)49(1): 116–117. 1942.Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Natti, J. J. Cabbage viruses in New York state. N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta., Farm Res.18(4): 7. 1952.Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    Nelson, A. Fertility in the genusBrassica. Jour. Genet.18: 110–135. 1926.Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Netroufal, F. Zytologische Studien über die Kulturrassen vonBrassica oleracea. Osterreich. Bot. Zeits.76: 101–115. 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Newcomer, E. H. An F2 colchicine-induced tetraploid cabbage and some comparisons with its diploid progenitor. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.59: 69–72. 1943.Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Nishiyama, I. [Breeding cold-resistantRaphanus sativus by the doubling of chromosome number.] Bot. and Zool.10: 57–58. 1942. [Plant Breed. Abst.21: 688.] [Original not seen].Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Noguchi, Y. Cytological studies on a case of pseudogamy in the genusBrassica. Proc. Imp. Acad. [Tokyo]4: 617–619. 1928.Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    Nylund, R. E. Ascorbic acid content of twenty-five varieties of the rutabaga. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.54: 367–372. 1949.Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    Odland, M. L., andNoll, C. J. The utilization of cross-compatibility and self-incompatibility in the production of F1 hybrid cabbage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.55: 390–402. 1950.Google Scholar
  172. 172.
    Okuno, S. [The genetics of root color in the radish.] Jap. Jour. Genet.19: 99–100. 1943. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.21: 3054. 1951.] [Original not seen].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Olsson, Gösta. [The crossing ability between different species ofBrassica.] Sveriges Utsadosforen. Tidskr.59: 193–195. 1949. [Biol. Abst.24: 22498]. [Original not seen].Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    —————. Crosses betweenBrassica napus L. and JapaneseBrassica napella Chaix. Hereditas40: 249–252. 1954. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    —————. Crosses within thecampestris group of the genusBrassica. Hereditas40: 398–418. 1954.Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Pearson, O. H. A suggested classification of the genusBrassica. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.25: 105–110. 1928.Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    —————. A dominant white flower color inBrassica oleracea L. Am. Nat.63: 561–565. 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    —————. Further observations on the type of sterility inBrassica oleracea var.capitata L. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.27: 337–342. 1930.Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    —————. Influence of inbreeding upon the season of maturity in cabbage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci28: 359–366. 1931.Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    —————. Incompatibility in broccoli and the production of seed under cages. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.29: 468–471. 1933.Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    —————. Study of the life history ofBrassica oleracea. Bot. Gaz.94: 534–550. 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    —————. Dominance of certain quality characters in cabbage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.31: 169–176. 1934.Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    Pease, M. S. Genetic studies inBrassica oleracea. Jour. Genet.16: 363–385. 1926.Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    —————. Genetic studies inBrassica. II. The kohlrabi. Jour. Genet.17: 253–267. 1927.Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Piech, K., andMoldenhawer, K. Zytologische Untersuchungen an Bastarden zwischenRaphanus undBrassica. Bull. Int. Acad. Polonaise Sci. et Lettr. Cl. Sci. Math. et Nat.1927: 23–38. 1927.Google Scholar
  186. 186.
    Politis, J. Sur des gènes produisant de l’anthocyane dans les plantulas deRaphanus sativus et d’autres Crucifères. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]225: 256–257. 1947.Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Poole, C. F., Grimball, P. C., andKanapaux, M. S. Factors affecting the ascorbic acid content of cabbage lines. Jour. Agr. Res.68: 325–329. 1944.Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    Pound, G. S. Reaction of cabbage varieties to mosaic viruses. Jour. Agr. Res.75: 19–30. 1947.Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    ————— andFowler, D. L. Fusarium wilt of radish in Wisconsin. Phytopath.43: 277–280. 1953.Google Scholar
  190. 190.
    ————— andWalker, J. C. Mosaic resistance in cabbage. Phytopath.41: 1083–1090. 1951.Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    Price, H. L. Inheritance in cabbage hybrids. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep.1911/1912: 240–257. 1912.Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    Ragionieri, A.Brassica crosses. Gard. Chron.68: 60. 1920.Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    Ramanujam, S. An apetalous mutation in turnip (Brassica campestris L.). Nature145: 552–553. 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    —————. Autotriploidy in toria (Brassica campestris L.). Curr. Sci.9: 325–326. 1940.Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    Rao, L. N. Flowering branches from the curd ofBrassica oleraceae L. var.botrytis D.C. Curr. Sci.7: 237–238. 1938.Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    Rasmusson, J. Results from a cross cabbage × savoy cabbage. Hereditas16: 241–248. 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Reichelt, K. Die Bekämpfung der Kohlmade. Möllers Deut. Gärtner-Zeit.41: 59–60. 1926.Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Reinking, O. A., andGloyer, W. O. Most cauliflower varieties resistant to cabbage yellows. N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta., Farm Res.6(4): 8. 1940.Google Scholar
  199. 199.
    Reitberger, A. Über polyploidie Ruhekerne bei Cruciferen. Naturwiss.36: 380. 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    —————. Chromozentrenuntersuchungen. I. Mitteilung. Über die Struktur junger Ruhekerne verscheidener Valenz bei vier Kruziferarten. Chromosoma4: 205–221. 1951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Richharia, R. H. Cytological investigation ofRaphanus sativus, Brassica oleracea, and their F1 and F2 hybrids. Jour. Genet.34: 19–44. 1937.Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    —————. Cytological investigations of 10-chromosome species ofBrassica and their F1 hybrids. Jour. Genet.34: 45–55. 1937.Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    —————. Investigation on F1 and F2 hybrids betweenBrassica carinata andRaphanus sativus. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.16: 137–144. 1937.Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    Rochlin, E. Zur Frage der Widerstandsfähigkeit der Cruciferen gegen die Kohlhernie (Plasmodiophora brassicae Wor.). Phytopath. Zeits.5: 381–406. 1933.Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    Roemer, W. Fruchtbarkeits- und Vererbungsstudien bei Brassicaartkreunzungen. Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.20: 377–416. 1935.Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Roney, J. N. Truck crop insect investigations. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep.46: 50. 1933.Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    Samson, S. LeBrassica oleracea. Quelques caractères héréditaires duBrassica oleracea. Rev. Inst. Agr. d’Oka.4: 92–95. 1930.Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    —————. La genetique duBrassica oleracea. Rev. Inst. Agr. d’Oka.4: 121–122. 1930.Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Sasaoka, T. On the pollen-tube growth in some species ofBrassica. Imp. Hort. Exp. Sta., Okitu, Japan, Res. Bull. 11. 1928.Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    —————. Karyological observations in different interspecific hybrids ofBrassica. Jap. Jour. Genet.6: 20–32. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Scheffer, R. P. Anthracnose leafspot of crucifers. N. C. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 92. 1950.Google Scholar
  212. 212.
    Sears, E. R. Cytological phenomena connected with self-sterility in the flowering plants. Genetics22: 130–181. 1937.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Shchavinskaya, S. A. Tetraploid cabbage obtained by means of regeneration. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet., and Pl. Breed. Ser. II7: 13–36. 1937. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  214. 214.
    —————. Octoploid cabbage experimentally obtained. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet., and Pl. Breed. II.7: 69–77. 1937. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  215. 215.
    —————. Elimination of radish chromosomes and conditions necessary for their functioning in crosses of cabbage and its polyploid forms with radish and radish-cabbage hybrids. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet., and Pl. Breed. Ser. II.7: 79–91. 1937. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  216. 216.
    Shimotomai, N. A karyological study ofBrassica I. Bot. Mag. [Tokyo]39: 122–127. 1925.Google Scholar
  217. 217.
    Shisa, M., andHazu, G. [Studies on resistance to snow inBrassica. I. Varietal differences in physiological characters associated with resistance to snow.] Jour. Hort. Assn. Japan20: 98–104. 1951. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.23: 1531. 1953.] [Original not seen.]Google Scholar
  218. 218.
    Sikka, S. M. Cytogenetics ofBrassica hybrids and species. Jour. Genet.40: 441–509. 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Simonet, M. Sur l’obtention de plantes géantes et polyploïdes, après application de colchicine. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France24: 846–850. 1938.Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    ————— andChopinet, R. Sur la création de variétés nouvelles tétraploïdes à grandes fleurs après traitement chimique. Rev. Hort. (n.s.)18: 146–152. 1942.Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    Sinskaia, E. Genetic systematic studies on cultivated Brassica. Bull. Appl. Bot. & Plant-Breed.17(1): 3–166. 1927. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  222. 222.
    Sinskaia, E. N. The oleiferous plants and root crops of the family Cruciferae. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. and Pl. Breed.19(3): 1–648. 1928. [Russian with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  223. 223.
    Sisa, M. A list of the chromosome number in vegetable crops. Jap. Jour. Genet.5: 88–95. 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Smith, F. G., andWalker, J. C. Relation of environmental and hereditary factors to ascorbic acid in cabbage. Am. Jour. Bot.33: 120. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Sterling, J. D. E. The inheritance of flesh colour and clubroot reaction in swedes. Sci. Agr.31: 253–268. 1951.Google Scholar
  226. 226.
    Stout, A. B. Cyclic manifestation of sterility inBrassica pekinensis andB. chinensis. Bot. Gaz.73: 110–132. 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    —————. Pollen tube behavior inBrassica pekinensis with reference to self incompatibility in fertilization. Am. Jour. Bot.18: 686–695. 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    Sturtevant, E. L. Sturtevant’s notes on edible plants. (U. P. Hedrick, Ed.) N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta., Twenty-seventh Ann. Rep. Vol. 2: 1–686. 1919.Google Scholar
  229. 229.
    Sun, V. G. The evaluation of taxonomic characters of the cultivatedBrassica with a key to species and varieties. II. The key. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club.73: 370–377. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. 230.
    Sutaria, R. N. Microsporogenesis inRaphanus sativus L. (the Indian radish). Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.9: 253–256. 1930.Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    Sutton, A. W.Brassica crosses. Jour. Linn. Soc. (Botany)38: 337–349. 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    Sutton, E. P. F. Inheritance of “bolting” in cabbage. Jour. Hered.15: 257–260. 1924.Google Scholar
  233. 233.
    Sylven, N. Kreuzungsstudien beim Raps (Brassica napus olifera). Hereditas9: 380–390. 1927. [English summ.]Google Scholar
  234. 234.
    Tandon, S. L. Colchicine-induced polyploidy inBrassica oleracea var.Botrytis L. Sci. & Cult.16: 483–484. 1951.Google Scholar
  235. 235.
    Tatebe, T. [Inheritance of root color in the radish.] Bot. and Zool.4: 1385–1392. 1936. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.10: 1142. 1940.] [Original not seen].Google Scholar
  236. 236.
    —————. [Karyological studies on the Japanese radish. (Raphanus sativus var.macropodus (Lév.) Makino.] Bot. and Zool.4: 1893–1900. 1935. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.9: 504. 1939.] [Original not seen.]Google Scholar
  237. 237.
    —————. [Studies on the inheritance of color in the Japanese and Chinese radish.] Bot. and Zool.5: 1301–1308. 1937. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.12: 602. 1942.] [Original not seen.]Google Scholar
  238. 238.
    —————. [Studies on the inheritance of root shape in the Japanese and Chinese radish.] Jour. Hort. Assn. Japan8: 327–336. 1937. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.8: 1634. 1938.] [Original not seen.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. 239.
    —————. [On inheritance of root color inRaphanus sativus Linn.] Jap. Jour. Genet.14: 39–50. 1938. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.8: 1633 and9: 867. 1939.] [Original not seen.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    —————. Studies on the behavior of incompatible pollen in the Japanese radish. Jour. Hort. Assn. Japan11: 207–234. 1940. [Japanese with Eng. summ.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    —————. Studies on the behavior of incompatible pollen inBrassica. IV.Brassica oleracea L. var.capitata L. and var.botrytis L. Jour. Hort. Assn. Japan20: 19–26. 1949. [Japanese with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  242. 242.
    Tatuno (Tatsuno), S. [On artificial polyploids of the radish. I.] Jap. Jour. Genet.22: 31–32. 1947. [Japanese] [Plant Breed. Abst.22: 1485. 1952.] [Original not seen.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Tedin, O. [The inheritance of resistance to club root disease (P. brassicae) of turnips (Brassica rapa v.rapifera) in relation to certain morphological characters of the root.] Nord. Jordbr. Forskn.14: 324–331. 1932. [English summ.]Google Scholar
  244. 244.
    Terasawa, Y. Konstante amphidiploideBrassico-Raphanus Bastarde. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo8: 312–314. 1932.Google Scholar
  245. 245.
    —————. Effekt der bastardierung vonBrassico-raphanus durchBrassica undRaphanus. Jap. Jour. Genet.8: 229–230. 1933. [Japanese] German summ. seen in Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 26. 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. 246.
    Thomas, R. C., andMagruder, R. Early cabbage resistant to the yellows disease. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bim. Bull.13: 142–144. 1928.Google Scholar
  247. 247.
    Thung, T. H. [Black rot of cabbage]. Landbouw21: 259–266. 1949. [Dutch with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  248. 248.
    Tokumasu, S. Male-sterility in Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Sci. Bull. Facult. Agr. Kyushu Univ.13: 83–89. 1951. [Japanese with Engl. summ.]Google Scholar
  249. 249.
    Tompkins, C. M. A mosaic disease of turnip. Jour. Agr. Res.57: 589–602. 1938.Google Scholar
  250. 250.
    —————. A mosaic disease of radish in California. Jour. Agr. Res.58: 119–130. 1939.Google Scholar
  251. 251.
    ————— andThomas, H. R. A mosaic disease of Chinese cabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 541–551. 1938.Google Scholar
  252. 252.
    Trouard-Riolle, Yvonne. Recherches morphologiques et biologiques sur les radis, cultivés. Ann. Sci. Agron. Franç. et Etrang.31: 295–322, 346–550. 1914.Google Scholar
  253. 253.
    —————. Hybridation entre une crucifère sauvage et une crucifère cultivée à racine tuberisée. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]162: 511–513. 1916.Google Scholar
  254. 254.
    —————. Les hybrides deRaphanus. Rev. Gen. Bot.32: 438–447. 1920.Google Scholar
  255. 255.
    Tschermak, E. von. Ueber den gegenwärtigen Stand der Gemüsezüchtung. Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.4: 65–104. 1916.Google Scholar
  256. 256.
    Turesson, G., andNordenskiold, H. Chromosome doubling and cross combinations in some cruciferous plants. Lantbr. Hogsk. Ann. [Uppsala]11: 201–206. 1943.Google Scholar
  257. 257.
    U. Nagaharu. Genome-analysis inBrassica with special reference to the experimental formation ofB. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 389–452. 1935.Google Scholar
  258. 258.
    —————, andSaito, K. On diploid and triploidBrassica-Raphanus hybrids. Cytologia8: 319–326. 1937.Google Scholar
  259. 259.
    ————— andNagamatsu, T. On the difference betweenBrassica campestris L. andB. napus L. in regard to fertility and natural crossing. Jour. Imp. Agr. Exp. Stat. Nishigahara (Tokyo)2: 113–128. 1933. [Japanese with Eng. summ.]Google Scholar
  260. 261.
    -----, -----, andMidusima, U. A report on meiosis in the two hybrids,Brassica alba Rabh. ♀ ×B. oleracea L. ♂ andEruca sativa Lam. ♀ ×B. oleracea L. ♂. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 437–441. 1937.Google Scholar
  261. 261.
    Uphof, J. C. Th. On mendelian factors in radishes. Genetics9: 292–304. 1924.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  262. 262.
    Vaarama, A. Chromosome number and cryptic polyploidy inLepidium sativum. Hereditas37: 290–292. 1951. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  263. 263.
    Van Clute, J. Caulicab is a new vegetable. Sowest. Crop & Stock6(3): 38–39. 1952.Google Scholar
  264. 264.
    Vavilov, N. I. [Studies on the origin of cultivated plants.] Bull. Appl. Bot. and Plant Breed.16: 139–248. 1926.Google Scholar
  265. 265.
    Verschaffelt, E. The causes determining the selection of food in some herbivorous insects. Kon. Akad. Wet. (Amsterdam), Proc.13(I): 536. 1910.Google Scholar
  266. 266.
    Walker, J. C. Studies upon the inheritance ofFusarium resistance in cabbage. Phytopath.16: 87. 1926. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  267. 267.
    —————. Inheritance ofFusarium resistance incabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.40: 721–745. 1930.Google Scholar
  268. 268.
    —————. Yellows-resistant lines of Jersey Wakefield cabbage. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 639–648. 1933.Google Scholar
  269. 269.
    —————. Resistance to clubroot inBrassica. Phytopath.26: 112. 1936. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  270. 270.
    —————. Resistance to clubroot in varieties of turnip and rutabaga. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 815–827. 1939.Google Scholar
  271. 271.
    —————. Progress in combination of yellows and mosaic resistance with ascorbic acid content in cabbage. Phytopath.34: 1012–1013. 1944. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  272. 272.
    ————— andFoster, R. E. The inheritance of ascorbic acid content in cabbage. Am. Jour. Bot.33: 758–761. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  273. 273.
    ————— andLarson, R. H. Development of clubroot resistance in cabbage. Phytopath.38: 28. 1948. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  274. 274.
    ————— and —————. Progress in the development of clubroot-resistant cabbage. Phytopath.41: 37. 1951. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  275. 275.
    ————— andPound, G. S. Improvement of cabbage for disease resistance. Phytopath.37: 23. 1947.Google Scholar
  276. 276.
    ————— andWellman, F. L. A Fusarium-resistant cabbage of Jersey Wakefield type. Phytopath.18: 142. 1928. [Abst.]Google Scholar
  277. 277.
    ————— and —————. A survey of the resistance of sub-species ofBrassica oleracea to yellows (Fusarium conglutinans). Jour. Agr. Res.37: 233–241. 1928.Google Scholar
  278. 278.
    Wang, T. M. Studies on the mechanism of resistance of cruciferous plants toPeronospora parasitica. Phytopath.39: 541–547. 1949.Google Scholar
  279. 279.
    Wester, R. E., andMagruder, R. Varietal and strain differences in bolting of turnips. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35(1937): 594–598. 1938.Google Scholar
  280. 280.
    Wheeler, L. C. The names of three species ofBrassica. Rhodora40: 306–309. 1938.Google Scholar
  281. 281.
    Whitehead, T. Experiments with “finger and toe” disease of swedes. Welsh Jour. Agr.1: 176–184. 1925.Google Scholar
  282. 282.
    Whitcomb, W. D. Resistance of cabbage to cabbage maggot. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.428: 39. 1945.Google Scholar
  283. 283.
    —————. Control of cabbage maggot. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.436: 40. 1946.Google Scholar
  284. 284.
    Yakuwa, K. Cytological observations on autotetraploidBrassica chinensis. Cytologia13: 162–163. 1944.Google Scholar
  285. 285.
    Yarnell, S. H. Five abnormal types of cabbage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.61: 447–450. 1953.Google Scholar
  286. 286.
    Yeager, A. F. The characteristics of crosses between botanical varieties of cabbage,Brassica oleraceae. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.43: 199–200. 1943.Google Scholar
  287. 287.
    Zimmerley, H. H. Cabbage strain tests. Va. Truck Exp. Sta., Bull. 37 and 38. 1922.Google Scholar
  288. 288.
    Zlatkovsky, A. [A hybrid between cauliflower and Brussels sprouts—a new form of vegetable in the making.] Sborn. Česk. Akad. Zeměd.25: 387–391. 1952. [Plant Breed. Abst.23: 1536. 1953.] [Original not seen.]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1956

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. H. Yarnell
    • 1
  1. 1.U. S. Department of AgricultureSoutheastern Vegetable Breeding LaboratoryCharlestonSouth Carolina

Personalised recommendations