Determination of immunoreactivity ofPlasmodium falciparum antigens, serum dilutions and biomaterials
Immunoreactivity properties of serum dilutions andPlasmodium falciparum malaria antigens were measured and compared by ELISA technique using different ELISA plates to evaluate the role of antigens and serum dilutions for optimum binding. Also effort has been made to see the effect of reaction surface and material i.e. ELISA plates for binding capacity. Serological properties were estimated by ELISA methods for detection of malaria and determination of immunological characteristics. Three Pf antigens (PfAg) i.e. ring infected erythrocyte surface antigen: AR-1 (RESA), histidine-rich protein 2 antigen (HRP-2) and glycophospholipid antigen (grown and developed Pf antigen from PSJ-M strain): GPL1 have been used for serological testing of human blood samples by Enzyme Link Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA). 1∶100, 1∶1000 and 1∶10000 dilutions of Pf positive and negative serum (50 samples in each group) and 1∶1000 dilution of Pf antigens were used to measure immunoreactive properties by ELISA method. Result of PfAg-serum immunoreactivity study showed that GPL1 has the highest degree of immuno binding reactivity compared to other Pf antigens. HRP-2 and RESA antigens showed no significant difference to each other. Study also found that Costar and Fastec ELISA plates have a better Ag−Ab binding capability compared to immulon and Falcon plates at all dilutions of serum. Serum dilution of 1∶100 showed best binding and reactivity with Pf antigens followed by 1∶1000 and 1∶10000 showed lowest reactivity.
Key wordsMalaria Serum dilutions GPL1 HRP-2 AR-1 antigens ELISA plates
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Soulier, J.P., Prou, O.S. and Dubarry, H. (1985)Plasmodium falciparum antigen detection with monoclonal antibodies. Dev. Biol. Standardization 62, 21–27.Google Scholar
- 2.Apr, M.E., Evans, C.B. and Taylor, D.W. (1991) Identification ofPlasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein 2 in the plasma of humans with malaria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29, 1629–1634.Google Scholar
- 4.Dietz, R., Perkins, M., Boulos, M., Boulos, M., Luz, F., Reller, B. and Corey, C.R. (1995) The diagnosis ofPlasmodium falciparum using a new antigen detection system. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 52, 45–49.Google Scholar
- 5.Gay, F., Traore, B., Zanoni, J., Danis, M. and Gentilini, M. (1994) Evaluation of the QBC system for the diagnosis of malaria. Santi 4, 289–297.Google Scholar
- 11.Fuchs, S. and Sela, M. (1978) Handbook of experimental immunology. Ed. D.M. Weir (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford). p. 101.Google Scholar
- 13.Weetall, H.H. (1970) Preparation and characterization of antigen and antibody adsorbents covalently coupled to an inorganic carrier. Biochem. J. 117, 25–61.Google Scholar
- 14.Line, W.F. and Becker, M.J. (1975) In immobilized enzymes, antigens, antibodies and peptides, ed. H.H. Weetall (Marcel Dekker, New York) p. 49.Google Scholar
- 21.Chiodini, P.L., Hartley, S., Hewett, P.E., Barbara, J.A., Lalloo, K., Bligh, J. and Voller, A. (1997) Evaluation of a malaria antibody ELISA and its value in reducing potential wastage of red cell donations from blood donors exposed to malaria, with a note on a case of transfusiontransmitted malaria. Vox sang 73, 143–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Assal, A., Kauffmann-Lacroix, C., Rodier, M.H., Darde, M.L., Houssay, D. and Jacquemin, J.L. (1999) Comparison de deux techniques de detection des anticorps anti-Plasmodium falciparum: Falciparum-spot IF (Biomerieux et Malaria IgG Celisa (BMD), Resultats Preliminaries. Transfus. Clin. Biol. 6, 119–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Mya, M.M., Saxena, R.K., Bhakat, P. and Roy, A. (2000) Effect of serum dilution in diagnosis of malaria in community. J. Comm. Dis. 32, 28–32.Google Scholar
- 24.Druilhe, P., Moreno, A., Blanc, C., Brasseur, P.H. and Jacquier, P. (2001) A colorimetricin vitro drug sensitivity assay forPlasmodium falciparum based on a highly sensitive double-site lactate dehydrogenase antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hygn. 64, 233–241.Google Scholar