Advertisement

Research in Clinic and Laboratory

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 139–147 | Cite as

Immunocytochemical typing of fine needle aspirates by means of alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase method. A study of 16 selected patients

  • Pellegrino Musto
  • Michele Aieta
  • Giuseppe Sperandeo
  • Mario Cammisa
  • Mario Carotenuto
Original Contributions
  • 9 Downloads

Summary

The immunocytochemical characterization of neoplastic cells recognized by a large panel of monoclonal antibodies in fine needle aspirates obtained from 16 subjects with superficial or profound tumoral masses of unknown origin was carried out using alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) immunoenzymatic method. The patients were selected on the basis of particular clinical criteria or since a correct cytohistological diagnosis was not available. APAAP immunophenotyping allowed to establish the existence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 6 cases, hairy cell leukemia in 1 case and carcinoma in 5 cases, while in other 2 patients the existence of Hodgkin’s disease was suspected and subsequently confirmed; only in 2 subjects diagnostic informations were lacking. Furthermore, the evaluation of growth fraction by means of Ki 67 monoclonal antibody revealed a high degree of malignancy in all cases of lymphoma. Although some cautions have to be considered in the interpretation of results, APAAP immunocytochemical typing of fine needle aspirates appears a simple and reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool in selected patients.

Key-words

APAAP method Fine needle aspirates Monoclonal antibodies Undifferentiated malignancies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthoniuz P.: Value of immunocytochemical technics applied to products of cytopuncture in the cytodiagnosis of tumors and metastases — Arch. Anat. Cytol. Pathol.34, 99, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chess Q., Hajdu S. I.: The role of immunoperoxidase staining in diagnostic cytology — Acta cytol. (Philad.)30, 1, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coindre J. M., Tanguy F., Merlio J. P., De Mascarel I., De Mascarel A., Trojani M.: The value of immunohistological techniques in undifferentiated cancers — Tumori72, 539, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coleman D. V., To A., Ormerod M. G., Dearnaley D. P.: Immunoperoxidase staining in tumor marker distribution studies in cytologic specimens — Acta cytol. (Philad.)25, 205, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cordell J. L., Falini B., Erber W. N., Ghosh K. A., Abdulaziz Z., MacDonald S., Pulford K. A. F., Stein H., Mason D. Y.: Immunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes) — J. Histochem. Cytochem.32, 219, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dalquen P.: Immunocytochemical cytodiagnostic of tumors — Verh. dtsch. Ges. Pathol.70, 387, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delsol G., Gatter K. C., Stein H., Erber W. N., Pulford K. A. F., Zinne K., Mason D. Y.: Human lymphoid cells may express epithelial membrane antigen: implications for the diagnosis of human neoplasms — Lancetii, 1124, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Domagala W., Lubinski J., Weber K., Osborn M.: Intermediate filament typing of tumor cells in fine needle aspirates by means of monoclonal antibodies — Acta cytol. (Philad.)30, 214, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Domagala W., Weber K., Osborn M.: Differential diagnosis of lymph node aspirates by intermediate filament typing of tumor cells — Acta cytol. (Philad.)30, 225, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Droese M., Altmannsberger M., Kehl A., Lankish P. G., Weiss R., Weber K., Osborn M.: Ultrasound guided percutaneous fine needle aspirates biopsy of abdominal and retroperitoneal masses: accuracy of cytology in the diagnosis of malignancy, cytologic tumor typing and use of antibodies to intermediate filaments in selected cases — Acta cytol. (Philad.)28, 368, 1984.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erber W. N., Mynheer L. C., Mason D. Y.: Labeling of blood and bone marrow samples for phenotyping leukemia — Lanceti, 761, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Falini B., Martelli M. F., Tarallo F., Moir D. J., Cordell J. L., Gatter K. C., Loreti G., Stein H., Mason D. Y.: Immunohistological analysis of human bone marrow trephine biopsies using monoclonal antibodies — Brit. J. Haematol.56, 365, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falini B., Pileri S., Stein H., Rivano M. T., Minelli O., Fagioli M., Mori A., Martelli M. F.: Leucocyte antigen-negative malignant lymphomas. In: Int. Meeting on Genotypic, Phenotypic and Functional Aspects of Haematopoiesis. Assisi, April 6–8, 1987; p. 129. (Abstract).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falini B., Pulford K. A. F., Erber W. N., Posnett D. N., Pallesen G., Schwarting R., Annino L., Cafolla A., Canino S., Mori A., Minelli O., Ciani C., Voxes E. E., Golomb H. M., Delsol G., Stein H., Martelli M. F., Grignani F., Mason D. Y.: Use of a panel of monoclonal antibodies for the diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia. An immunocytochemical study of 36 cases — Histopathology10, 671, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferrucci J. T., Wittenberg J., Mueller P. R., Simeone J. F., Harbin W. P., Kirkpatrick R. H., Taft P. D.: Diagnosis of abdominal malignancy by radiologic fine needle aspiration biopsy — Amer. J. Roentgenol.134, 323, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gatter K. C., Alcock C., Heryet A., Mason D. Y.: Clinical importance of analysing malignant tumours of uncertain origin with immunohistological techniques — Lanceti, 1302, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerdes J., Dallenbach F., Lennert K.: Growth fraction in malignant non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma as determinedin situ with the monoclonal antibody Ki 67 — Hematol. Oncol.2, 365, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerdes J., Lemke H., Baisch H., Wacker H. H., Schwab U., Stein H.: Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki 67 — J. Immunol.133, 1710, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gustafsson B.: Methodological aspects and application of the immunoperoxidase staining technique in diagnostic fine needle aspirates cytology — Diagnost. Cytopathol.3, 68, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heyderman E., Brown B. M. E.: Preparation of fine needle aspirates for immunocytochemical studies — Lancetii, 520, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koss L. G., Woyke S., Oiszewsky W.: Aspiration Biopsy Cytologic Interpretation and Histological Bases. Igaku-Shoin, New York-Tokyo, 1984.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linder J., Olsen G. A., Johnston W. W.: Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the mediastinum — Amer. J. Med.81, 1005, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Musto P., Bavaro P., Cascavilla N., Melillo L., Nobile M.: Tecniche immunoenzimatiche di caratterizzazione cellulare: particolari possibilità applicative nella citologia oncoematologica — Medicina (Rivista EMI)7, 38, 1987.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pileri S., Gerdes J., Rivano M. T., Gobbi M., Taruscio D., Mazza P., Tura S., Stein H.: Linfoma istiocitico vero e linfomi a cellule attivate. In:Mandelli F., Tura S. (Eds): XII Corso di Aggiornamento in Ematologia Clinica. Esculapio, Bologna, 1986; p. 519.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramaekers F., Haag D., Jap P., Vooijs P. G.: Immunochemical demonstration of keratin and vimentin in cytologic aspirates — Acta cytol. (Philad.)28, 385, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwab U., Stein H., Gerdes J., Lemke H., Kirchner H., Schaadt M., Diehl V.: Production of a monoclonal antibody specific for Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease and a subset of normal lymphoid cells — Nature (Lond.)299, 265, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Selter D. M., Krajewsky A. S., Dewar A. E.: Immunohistochemical staining of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas with monoclonal antibodies specific for the leucocyte common antigen — J. Pathol.146, 345, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sloane J. P., Ormerod M. G.: Distribution of epithelial membrane antigen in normal and neoplastic tissues and its value in diagnostic tumor pathology — Cancer (Philad.)47, 1586, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tani E. M., Christensson B., Porwit A., Skoog L.: Immunocytochemical analysis and cytomorphologic diagnosis on fine needle aspirates of lymphoproliferative disease — Acta cytol. (Philad.)32, 209, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pellegrino Musto
    • 1
  • Michele Aieta
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Sperandeo
    • 2
  • Mario Cammisa
    • 2
  • Mario Carotenuto
    • 1
  1. 1.Divisione di EmatologiaOspedale Generale Regionale «Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza’San Giovanni Rotondo (FG)Italia
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Diagnostica per ImmaginiOspedale Generale Regionale «Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza’San Giovanni Rotondo

Personalised recommendations