Economic Botany

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 555–569 | Cite as

Ethnobotanical comparison Of “Pau Brasil” (Brosimum Rubescens Taub.) forests in a Xavante Indian and a non-Xavante community in eastern Mato Grosso State, Brazil

  • Beatriz Schwantes Marimon
  • Jeanine Maria Felfili


A monodominant forest of Brosimum rubescens Taub. located in an Indian Reservation was compared with a similar forest located on a farm owned by non-Xavante settlers, in terms of its phytosociology and the patterns of plant use. In both areas, 60 (10 X 10 m) nested-plots were established in a representative portion of the forest. All woody plants were identified, and their common and scientific names and uses were recorded. The ethnobotanical study was conducted by open-interviews initially and ranking at a later stage for a total of two years of study. The Xavante people use more species, 56% of the 57 species fit in five categories of direct use while the settlers have direct use for 50% of the 44 species found in the forest. The Xavante culture has strong links with the native biodiversity, valuing the multiple use of the species while the settlers use them mostly for timber. The species with higher IVI in the phytosociological study were also the most valued in both communities. Brosimum wood is used for the making of traditional clubs by the Xavante, the fruits are edible and attract wildlife for hunting. The non-Xavante people have been heavily logging these trees for fence posts used in the large farms of the region.

Key Words

Brosimum rubescens tropical forest savanna ethnobotany Xavante indians Brazil 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, A. B., and D. A. Posey. 1989. Management of a tropical scrub savanna by the Gorotire Kayapó of Brazil. Advances in Economic Botany 7:159–173.Google Scholar
  2. Balée, W. 1989. The culture of Amazonian forests. Advances in Economic Botany 7:1–21.Google Scholar
  3. Beard, J. S. 1946. The Mora forest of Trinidad, British West Indies. Journal of Ecology 33:173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiara, V. 1987. Armas: Bases para uma classificação. Pages 117–137in D. Ribeiro, ed., Suma Etnológica Brasileira, Tecnologia Indígena. Vozes/FINEP, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, J. H., and M. D Lowman. 1989. Low-diversity tropical rain forests: some possible mechanism for their existence. American Naturalist 134: 88–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Felflli, J. M., J. W. D. Machado, R. M. Cabral, and M.C. Silva Júnior. 1988. Distribuição dos diâmetros para a mata deBrosimum rubescens Taub. e algumas de suas principals espécies. Resumos. VII Cong. Soc. Bot. de S. Paulo.Google Scholar
  7. —,M. C. Silva Júnior,and P. E. N. Silva. 1998. Levantamento da vegetação arbórea na região de Nova Xavantina, MT. Bol. Herb. Ezechias Paulo Heringer 3:63–81.Google Scholar
  8. Giaccaria, B.,and A. Heide. 1972. Xavante, (Auwë uptabi: povo autêntico). Ed. Dom Bosco, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  9. Gomez-Pompa, A., J. S. Flores, and V. Sosa. 1987. The “Pet Kot”: a man-made tropical forest of the Maya. Interciencia 12:10–15.Google Scholar
  10. Gross, D. R., G. Eiten, N. M. Flowers, F. M. Leoi, M. L. Ritter, and D. W. Werner. 1979. Ecology and acculturation among native peoples of Central Brazil. Science 206:1043–1050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ianelli, R. V. 1997. Epidemiologia da malária em uma população indígena do Brasil central: os Xavánte de Pimentel Barbosa. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Dissertação de Mestrado.Google Scholar
  12. Johnston, M., and A. Colquhoun. 1996. Preliminary ethnobotanical survey of Kurupukari: an Amerindian settlement of central Guyana. Economic Botany 50:182–194.Google Scholar
  13. Lopes da Silva, A. 1986. Nomes e amigos: da prática Xavante a uma reflexão sobre os Jê. Antropologia, 6, FFLCH/USP, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  14. Marimon, B. S. 1998. Estrutura, composição florística e etnobotânica de floresta monodo- minante no Vale do Araguaia—Mato Grosso. MSc. Thesis, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.Google Scholar
  15. —,and J. M. Felflli. 1997. Structure of a monodominant forest ofBrosimum rubescens Taub. in Nova Xavantina-MT. Pages 215–230in J.I. Encinas and C. Kleinn, Preecedings of the international symposium on assessment and monitoring of forests in Tropical dry regions with special reference to gallery forests. Brasíli, University of Brasília.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, G. J. 1995. Ethnobotany: a people and plants conservation manual. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  17. Maybury-Lewis, D. 1974. A Sociedade Xavante. Francisco Alves, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, R. P., E. V. Wandelli, and P. Grenand. 1989. Conhecimento e utilização da floresta pelos índios Waimiri-Atroari do Rio Camanau-Amazonas. Acta bot. bras. 3:47–56.Google Scholar
  19. Milliken, W., and B. Albert. 1996. The use of medicinal plants by the Yanomami indians of Brazil. Economic Botany. 50:10–25.Google Scholar
  20. Milliken, W., R. P. Miller, S. R. Pollard, and E. V. Wandelli. 1992. Ethnobotany of the Waimiri Atroari indians of Brazil. RBG, Kew. 146 p.Google Scholar
  21. Posey, D. A. 1985. Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapó indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems. 3: 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prance, G. T., W. Balée, B. M. Boom, and R. L. Carneiro. 1987. Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1:296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ratter, J. A., P. W. Richards, G. Argent, and D. R. Gifford. 1973. Observations on the vegetation of the northeastern Mato Grosso. I. The woody vegetation types of the Xavantina-Cachimbo Expedition area. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266:449–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Torquebiau, E. 1984. Man made Dipterocarp Forest in Sumatra. Agroforestry Systems 2:103–127.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatriz Schwantes Marimon
    • 1
  • Jeanine Maria Felfili
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciências BiológicasCampus de Nova Xavantina, Universidade do Estado de Mato GrossoNova Xavantina, Mato GrossoBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Engenharia FlorestalUniversidade de BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations